(new) Theory and Practice of Programming

Concurrency: the race is on - (FuManChu) - (40) - Jan. 2, 2005, 10:37:48 AM EST

Interesting, but ... - (Another Scott) - (4) - Jan. 2, 2005, 11:12:25 AM EST

I think he's talking to shrinkwrappers - (FuManChu) - Jan. 2, 2005, 09:06:36 PM EST

I'd criticize it differently - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Jan. 3, 2005, 02:16:22 AM EST

That's true for servers, less so for workstations - (drewk) - (1) - Jan. 3, 2005, 12:25:33 PM EST

True... - (ben_tilly) - Jan. 5, 2005, 12:40:11 AM EST

Favorite quote - (drewk) - (1) - Jan. 3, 2005, 12:12:21 PM EST

Speaking of quotes... (new thread) - (folkert) - Jan. 3, 2005, 12:52:47 PM EST

Just use databases and transactions. Fixed! -NT - (tablizer) - (32) - Jan. 8, 2005, 05:59:50 PM EST

Yes and no... - (Simon_Jester) - Jan. 8, 2005, 07:23:06 PM EST

And again, you demonstrate yourself to be wrong - (ben_tilly) - (30) - Jan. 10, 2005, 10:16:55 AM EST

Up with people - (FuManChu) - (24) - Jan. 10, 2005, 12:19:17 PM EST

No connection - (ben_tilly) - (23) - Jan. 10, 2005, 10:33:23 PM EST

Questions - (tablizer) - (22) - Jan. 15, 2005, 04:07:02 AM EST

Don't try to solve the problem - (ben_tilly) - (7) - Jan. 15, 2005, 09:12:24 AM EST

Dude, you are rude. Grow some people skills - (tablizer) - (4) - Jan. 16, 2005, 02:16:01 AM EST

This was one of your most hilarious posts ever, Bryce. -NT - (CRConrad) - (2) - Jan. 17, 2005, 01:57:50 AM EST

I am learning NOT to flame back. Me grow up........I think -NT - (tablizer) - (1) - Jan. 17, 2005, 10:59:48 PM EST

A: Doubt it. B: Still, YOU calling SOMEONE ELSE rude=>funnee -NT - (CRConrad) - Jan. 18, 2005, 02:00:54 AM EST

Yes, you did answer something - (ben_tilly) - Jan. 19, 2005, 06:29:29 PM EST

lock and load - (cforde) - (1) - Jan. 17, 2005, 03:18:05 AM EST

re: lock and load - (tablizer) - Jan. 17, 2005, 11:24:42 PM EST

Question for you - (drewk) - (13) - Jan. 16, 2005, 04:31:58 PM EST

All the damn time - (broomberg) - (9) - Jan. 16, 2005, 08:01:04 PM EST

No hints from the peanut gallery - (drewk) - (8) - Jan. 16, 2005, 08:05:00 PM EST

Give him the benefit - (broomberg) - (7) - Jan. 16, 2005, 08:11:15 PM EST

Fairy nuff - (drewk) - (6) - Jan. 16, 2005, 08:29:32 PM EST

Barry's right; overnormalization is 1 of Bryce's hobbyhorses -NT - (CRConrad) - (4) - Jan. 17, 2005, 01:57:15 AM EST

Huh? What did I over-normalize? -NT - (tablizer) - (3) - Jan. 17, 2005, 11:25:14 PM EST

It means the opposite of what you seem to think it does. HTH -NT - (CRConrad) - (2) - Jan. 18, 2005, 01:57:24 AM EST

Okay then, what did I UNDER-normalize? - (tablizer) - (1) - Jan. 18, 2005, 09:33:12 PM EST

SIGH... "A hobby-horse" means, something you like to... - (CRConrad) - Jan. 19, 2005, 10:29:32 AM EST

Note: in this case it really is a bad idea - (ben_tilly) - Jan. 19, 2005, 06:35:22 PM EST

Re: Question for you - (tablizer) - (2) - Jan. 17, 2005, 11:17:29 PM EST

Also called trade-offs. - (static) - (1) - Jan. 18, 2005, 01:25:03 AM EST

re: Also called trade-offs - (tablizer) - Jan. 18, 2005, 09:53:21 PM EST

Ah yes, the Upperson procedure - (tuberculosis) - Jan. 10, 2005, 06:31:02 PM EST

Guilty until proven innocent? -NT - (tablizer) - (3) - Jan. 15, 2005, 04:00:49 AM EST

No, you said something stupid - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Jan. 15, 2005, 09:16:55 AM EST

You don't seem to disagree anywhere - (tablizer) - (1) - Jan. 16, 2005, 02:44:41 AM EST

I disagree with, "Fixed!" - (ben_tilly) - Jan. 19, 2005, 11:59:54 PM EST

Just started working on a JSP/Struts project - (bluke) - (5) - Dec. 20, 2004, 10:22:25 AM EST

Struts/JSP is already a few years old. - (Yendor) - (1) - Dec. 20, 2004, 10:28:23 AM EST

Unfortunately I don't make these decisions - (bluke) - Dec. 20, 2004, 10:46:59 AM EST

I feel your pain. - (mmoffitt) - Dec. 20, 2004, 11:33:49 AM EST

Yep, stone aged technology - (tuberculosis) - Dec. 20, 2004, 12:18:36 PM EST

In defense... - (Simon_Jester) - Dec. 21, 2004, 04:32:52 PM EST

Hey Ben: Perl fork / return value question - (broomberg) - (10) - Dec. 14, 2004, 03:45:13 PM EST

Just follow the documentation... - (ben_tilly) - (9) - Dec. 14, 2004, 04:02:21 PM EST

Smack! (forehead) -NT - (broomberg) - Dec. 14, 2004, 05:30:38 PM EST

Doesn't seem to work - (broomberg) - (7) - Dec. 14, 2004, 09:24:06 PM EST

I think you wanted $kid == $pid, not $kid == -1 - (ben_tilly) - (6) - Dec. 14, 2004, 10:09:28 PM EST

Got it. - (broomberg) - (5) - Dec. 14, 2004, 10:31:08 PM EST

D'oh, I missed the call to sleep in your loop - (ben_tilly) - (4) - Dec. 14, 2004, 10:35:18 PM EST

No prob - (broomberg) - (3) - Dec. 14, 2004, 11:08:22 PM EST

Got it, but define shortest? - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Dec. 15, 2004, 02:55:45 PM EST

Yick - (broomberg) - (1) - Dec. 15, 2004, 11:01:01 PM EST

Sounds reasonable -NT - (ben_tilly) - Dec. 16, 2004, 04:25:30 PM EST

Static HTML from database - (Arkadiy) - (19) - Dec. 8, 2004, 07:26:43 AM EST

Or VB. - (mmoffitt) - Dec. 8, 2004, 01:13:38 PM EST

Prebuilt template system just for you - (FuManChu) - (15) - Dec. 8, 2004, 02:02:00 PM EST

Come on. - (Arkadiy) - (14) - Dec. 8, 2004, 02:30:12 PM EST

XSLT? - (altmann) - (3) - Dec. 8, 2004, 04:20:07 PM EST

UGH! He's better off with plain ol C code. - (tuberculosis) - (2) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:35:25 AM EDT

Sorry - (altmann) - Dec. 8, 2004, 07:45:35 PM EST

XSL isn't bad for simple, quick and dirty formatting - (admin) - Dec. 8, 2004, 08:58:01 PM EST

How complex do you want to get? - (admin) - (9) - Dec. 8, 2004, 04:06:39 PM EST

So, what would be a good one for Python? - (Arkadiy) - (8) - Dec. 8, 2004, 04:59:22 PM EST

Sounds like a job for Perl's HTML::Template - (Yendor) - (1) - Dec. 8, 2004, 05:25:37 PM EST

There are a ton of good Perl template modules - (ben_tilly) - Dec. 8, 2004, 10:45:32 PM EST

That's the reason many people would choose Python - (FuManChu) - (5) - Dec. 9, 2004, 12:48:09 AM EST

That's going a bit far... - (admin) - (4) - Dec. 9, 2004, 01:08:06 AM EST

Meh. I'll meet that halfway - (FuManChu) - (3) - Dec. 9, 2004, 01:41:50 AM EST

So say it already - (Arkadiy) - (2) - Dec. 9, 2004, 10:06:00 AM EST

I can't think of any that do *everything* you want - (FuManChu) - (1) - Dec. 9, 2004, 11:11:11 AM EST

*Sigh* - (Arkadiy) - Dec. 9, 2004, 11:13:47 AM EST

Me? :-) - (static) - (1) - Dec. 8, 2004, 06:59:01 PM EST

Can't rely on anything in th esrever beyond static pages. -NT - (Arkadiy) - Dec. 9, 2004, 10:04:06 AM EST

Why does something this simple, take soo long? - (folkert) - (21) - Dec. 7, 2004, 02:27:17 PM EST

Probably at the Access level - (JayMehaffey) - (1) - Dec. 7, 2004, 03:10:19 PM EST

Doesn't matter either way. - (folkert) - Dec. 7, 2004, 05:37:39 PM EST

Investigate Pass-Through Queries in Access -NT - (altmann) - (1) - Dec. 7, 2004, 04:35:46 PM EST

Thanks. I do that later. - (folkert) - Dec. 7, 2004, 05:39:12 PM EST

Latency between Access and SQL Server - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Dec. 7, 2004, 05:13:12 PM EST

That is just WRONG. - (folkert) - Dec. 7, 2004, 05:40:00 PM EST

Sometimes faster just to import the whole table - (ChrisR) - Dec. 7, 2004, 05:53:08 PM EST

I would ask for a showplan - (Simon_Jester) - (1) - Dec. 7, 2004, 05:25:51 PM EST

There is an osql - (altmann) - Dec. 7, 2004, 06:43:59 PM EST

The answer is in the first line of your post -NT - (tuberculosis) - (1) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:34:31 AM EDT

Clever, cleaver, thine art. -NT - (folkert) - Dec. 8, 2004, 01:02:49 PM EST

Most questions that start, "why does Access......?" - (tablizer) - (9) - Dec. 22, 2004, 05:17:20 PM EST

That might change. - (inthane-chan) - (8) - Dec. 22, 2004, 05:38:40 PM EST

Not unless VB is integrated with SQL server - (ben_tilly) - (7) - Dec. 22, 2004, 06:28:24 PM EST

Yeesh! - (inthane-chan) - (4) - Dec. 22, 2004, 06:47:37 PM EST

That trick is actually useful..ugly, but useful -NT - (ben_tilly) - (3) - Dec. 22, 2004, 07:50:13 PM EST

The poor man's Control Tables -NT - (ChrisR) - (2) - Dec. 22, 2004, 07:57:27 PM EST

That's one thing to use it for -NT - (ben_tilly) - Dec. 22, 2004, 08:40:28 PM EST

Files systems are not much better. Trees too damned limited -NT - (tablizer) - Dec. 26, 2004, 03:24:20 AM EST

Perish the thought - (ChrisR) - Dec. 22, 2004, 07:06:12 PM EST

"In the Next Version" - (altmann) - Dec. 22, 2004, 08:01:26 PM EST

Python 2.4 final is out and has a new subprocess module - (FuManChu) - (8) - Dec. 2, 2004, 12:26:13 PM EST

Does it work with eudora2mbox.py? Yes, it does. Grr.... - (Another Scott) - Dec. 2, 2004, 05:12:42 PM EST

They need to get rid of the global interpreter lock -NT - (admin) - (6) - Dec. 2, 2004, 01:00:41 PM EST

Feel free to submit a patch ;) -NT - (FuManChu) - (2) - Dec. 3, 2004, 12:24:30 PM EST

I don't need to. - (admin) - (1) - Dec. 3, 2004, 01:11:33 PM EST

Multiprocess is indeed the way to go - (FuManChu) - Dec. 3, 2004, 01:41:58 PM EST

Does this effect only the C API's? - (ChrisR) - (2) - Dec. 3, 2004, 12:29:40 PM EST

It already does that for a good chunk of C code - (FuManChu) - (1) - Dec. 3, 2004, 12:46:46 PM EST

Not quite. - (admin) - Dec. 3, 2004, 01:10:37 PM EST

One line description of data model for Perl - (Arkadiy) - (33) - Nov. 22, 2004, 10:27:40 AM EST

Yep, you got it right. - (admin) - (1) - Nov. 22, 2004, 10:35:05 AM EST

You're not helping - (Arkadiy) - Nov. 22, 2004, 10:37:48 AM EST

Perl: Everything is... - (ChrisR) - Nov. 22, 2004, 10:45:04 AM EST

Over simplifying - (broomberg) - (1) - Nov. 22, 2004, 10:48:39 AM EST

linquistic versus data personalities - (tablizer) - Nov. 22, 2004, 08:57:08 PM EST

To pick up from what Barry said. - (static) - (4) - Nov. 22, 2004, 08:05:46 PM EST

No, everything is whatever Barry needs it to be - (Arkadiy) - (3) - Nov. 22, 2004, 11:17:13 PM EST

The logic - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Dec. 4, 2004, 05:16:08 AM EST

Keys... - (Simon_Jester) - (1) - Dec. 4, 2004, 12:06:16 PM EST

Tie is NOT a module (and it sucks) - (ben_tilly) - Dec. 4, 2004, 04:54:08 PM EST

Well, Lisp - everything is a list or an atom... - (Simon_Jester) - (18) - Nov. 22, 2004, 10:40:00 PM EST

Atonm, list, hash... - (Arkadiy) - (17) - Nov. 22, 2004, 11:14:04 PM EST

References are essentially pointers - (broomberg) - (7) - Nov. 22, 2004, 11:30:35 PM EST

I am not trying to build anything in particular just now - (Arkadiy) - (6) - Nov. 23, 2004, 07:16:43 AM EST

some answers - (cforde) - (5) - Nov. 24, 2004, 01:32:29 AM EST

OK, another arbitrary distinction to remember - (Arkadiy) - (4) - Nov. 24, 2004, 10:01:21 AM EST

It's easy enough to test... - (Simon_Jester) - (2) - Nov. 24, 2004, 11:11:23 AM EST

Yes it is easy to test. - (Arkadiy) - (1) - Nov. 24, 2004, 12:31:51 PM EST

Testing has some disadvantages.... - (Simon_Jester) - Nov. 24, 2004, 04:56:19 PM EST

It isn't arbitrary - (ben_tilly) - Dec. 4, 2004, 05:37:15 AM EST

References: pointers in languages that don't have pointers -NT - (FuManChu) - Nov. 23, 2004, 12:44:27 AM EST

okay...look at it this way.... - (Simon_Jester) - Nov. 23, 2004, 11:01:34 AM EST

PERL DOES NOT STORE LISTS!!! - (ben_tilly) - (6) - Dec. 4, 2004, 05:23:10 AM EST

OK, in that case, what is (a,b,c) ? - (Arkadiy) - (5) - Dec. 5, 2004, 04:04:07 PM EST

In which context? - (ben_tilly) - (4) - Dec. 5, 2004, 04:21:12 PM EST

In the context of grammar and syntax - (Arkadiy) - (3) - Dec. 5, 2004, 05:14:47 PM EST

Simple answer: there is no syntactic difference - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Dec. 5, 2004, 11:06:00 PM EST

OK, I think I get it. - (Arkadiy) - (1) - Dec. 6, 2004, 09:35:02 AM EST

Yup, sounds like you've got it - (ben_tilly) - Dec. 6, 2004, 11:49:06 AM EST

lets try another viewpoint - (daemon) - Nov. 25, 2004, 12:37:20 AM EST

Sorry for not responding in this thread earlier - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Dec. 4, 2004, 05:08:26 AM EST

No worries. - (Arkadiy) - (1) - Dec. 4, 2004, 11:52:30 AM EST

:-) -NT - (ben_tilly) - Dec. 4, 2004, 04:55:28 PM EST

OH NOES - (pwhysall) - (6) - Nov. 19, 2004, 01:44:07 AM EST

Wow, the balls of some people - (jake123) - Nov. 19, 2004, 01:48:25 AM EST

While this is just a practical joke now - (Arkadiy) - Nov. 19, 2004, 10:35:48 AM EST

Gotta be a joke, - (jb4) - (1) - Nov. 19, 2004, 01:49:40 PM EST

It is NOT. Microsoft has pursued this. Reported Groklaw -NT - (folkert) - Nov. 19, 2004, 04:33:57 PM EST

Trying to bulk up the portfolio of doom - (JayMehaffey) - Nov. 21, 2004, 07:58:03 PM EST

There is a vast amount of prior art - (tuberculosis) - Aug. 21, 2007, 05:52:57 AM EDT

Finding decent programmers - (tuberculosis) - (56) - Nov. 8, 2004, 01:41:48 PM EST

well.. - (deSitter) - Nov. 8, 2004, 01:59:47 PM EST

Not surprising. - (admin) - (35) - Nov. 8, 2004, 02:20:40 PM EST

Don't agree - (tuberculosis) - (34) - Nov. 8, 2004, 03:15:09 PM EST

Hire Jake - (deSitter) - Nov. 8, 2004, 03:18:47 PM EST

Re: Don't agree - (admin) - (22) - Nov. 8, 2004, 03:27:22 PM EST

Oh yeah - we want one scripting language - (tuberculosis) - (21) - Nov. 8, 2004, 03:46:18 PM EST

Please don't ask the one about the manhole covers. :-/ - (Another Scott) - (1) - Nov. 8, 2004, 03:50:34 PM EST

Otherwise known as... - (admin) - Nov. 8, 2004, 04:17:49 PM EST

Shell scripting isn't the same thing at all. - (admin) - (9) - Nov. 8, 2004, 04:04:34 PM EST

I said it was rhetorical - (tuberculosis) - (1) - Nov. 8, 2004, 04:35:33 PM EST

Don't you mean, "rederickal"? - (admin) - Nov. 8, 2004, 04:47:36 PM EST

Admin, I'd like a copy of the CD or the ISO. -NT - (folkert) - (6) - Nov. 28, 2006, 12:03:24 AM EST

I'll throw a copy up on my site. - (admin) - (5) - Nov. 28, 2006, 12:24:31 AM EST

I wonder if that CD would be good as a VMWare image - (tonytib) - Nov. 28, 2006, 02:02:23 AM EST

When ever. Its a *NOT* short term thing. -NT - (folkert) - Nov. 28, 2006, 02:08:16 AM EST

Re: I'll throw a copy up on my site. - (admin) - (2) - Nov. 28, 2006, 12:04:29 PM EST

Interesting. - (folkert) - (1) - Nov. 28, 2006, 03:58:54 PM EST

Enjoy. -NT - (admin) - Nov. 28, 2006, 04:51:52 PM EST

Potentially sparse? I don't think so... - (ben_tilly) - (6) - Nov. 8, 2004, 05:29:51 PM EST

I took the ones that start with 0 into account. - (admin) - (2) - Nov. 8, 2004, 05:42:36 PM EST

I was referring to the step where you... - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Nov. 8, 2004, 05:49:44 PM EST

Ah, gotcha. Good point. -NT - (admin) - Nov. 8, 2004, 06:21:56 PM EST

For various values of "sparse" - (tuberculosis) - (1) - Nov. 8, 2004, 06:57:18 PM EST

Unless you have a lot of knowledge... - (ben_tilly) - Nov. 8, 2004, 07:45:36 PM EST

Re: social security numbers can start with 0 - (a6l6e6x) - Nov. 9, 2004, 02:08:24 AM EST

Re: Oh yeah - we want one scripting language - (ubernostrum) - (1) - Nov. 29, 2006, 12:34:54 AM EST

IRLRPD. (new thread) - (Another Scott) - Nov. 29, 2006, 07:50:27 AM EST

NEED to be fixed or MAY need to be fixed? - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Nov. 8, 2004, 06:05:13 PM EST

MAY - (tuberculosis) - Nov. 8, 2004, 06:54:34 PM EST

you dont sell fish anymore, who cares if its fresh? - (daemon) - Nov. 8, 2004, 06:36:54 PM EST

Reversing words is trickier than chars - (Arkadiy) - (6) - Nov. 8, 2004, 08:34:57 PM EST

read the post above yours :-) - (daemon) - Nov. 8, 2004, 09:00:47 PM EST

You're missing an obvious and good solution - (tuberculosis) - (4) - Nov. 8, 2004, 09:26:37 PM EST

ohhh - (Arkadiy) - Nov. 8, 2004, 09:31:04 PM EST

An obvious but NOT necessarily good solution - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Nov. 8, 2004, 10:31:24 PM EST

It gives the results I expect - (tuberculosis) - (1) - Nov. 8, 2004, 11:36:56 PM EST

I was assuming... - (ben_tilly) - Nov. 9, 2004, 11:24:29 AM EST

Well it helps if you learn to spell it - (ben_tilly) - (10) - Nov. 8, 2004, 02:25:25 PM EST

I think you'd pass - (tuberculosis) - (9) - Nov. 8, 2004, 03:32:34 PM EST

RemoveSpaces - (Arkadiy) - Nov. 8, 2004, 05:24:13 PM EST

I might pass at that... - (ben_tilly) - (7) - Nov. 8, 2004, 05:51:54 PM EST

Wife's-pathology interviews? >:-) -NT - (Another Scott) - (3) - Nov. 8, 2004, 05:58:05 PM EST

Yes, she'll be a pathological expert -NT - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Nov. 8, 2004, 06:56:10 PM EST

wow! goatrope her into a trip east - (daemon) - (1) - Nov. 8, 2004, 09:03:34 PM EST

That's up to her - (ben_tilly) - Nov. 8, 2004, 10:32:59 PM EST

If you do decide to come here - (tuberculosis) - (2) - Nov. 8, 2004, 06:50:17 PM EST

Get yourself enough iwetheyers in your dept... - (FuManChu) - (1) - Nov. 8, 2004, 06:54:20 PM EST

Imagine what PARC might have done - (tuberculosis) - Nov. 8, 2004, 06:59:26 PM EST

I can answer all those questions. - (jake123) - (3) - Nov. 8, 2004, 02:39:43 PM EST

When can you get here? - (tuberculosis) - (2) - Nov. 8, 2004, 03:47:59 PM EST

YEAH! -NT - (deSitter) - Nov. 8, 2004, 03:19:41 PM EST

Ooh yeah - IWETHEY-West, here we come! -NT - (inthane-chan) - Nov. 8, 2004, 04:45:35 PM EST

I could take a stab... - (Arkadiy) - Nov. 8, 2004, 05:22:15 PM EST

Almost contradictory requests - (tablizer) - (1) - Nov. 9, 2004, 12:03:20 AM EST

Not true - (broomberg) - Nov. 9, 2004, 12:35:15 AM EST

There seems to be a problem in CS education - (ubernostrum) - Nov. 29, 2006, 12:16:34 AM EST

Time for good anti-OO battle to take minds off of election - (tablizer) - (77) - Nov. 1, 2004, 11:35:59 PM EST

Sorry cant go there - (daemon) - (32) - Nov. 1, 2004, 11:48:17 PM EST

How is being locked to a DB more evil than being locked to - (tablizer) - (31) - Nov. 2, 2004, 12:39:02 AM EST

It's best to fit the tool to the job - (FuManChu) - (30) - Nov. 2, 2004, 02:11:14 AM EST

Thanks for that ... +5 insightful - (drewk) - (6) - Nov. 2, 2004, 09:40:01 AM EST

For various definitions of "start" ;) - (FuManChu) - Nov. 2, 2004, 11:07:35 AM EST

On writing the "little language thing ..." - (systems) - (4) - Nov. 5, 2004, 02:16:06 PM EST

Suggestion - (ben_tilly) - Nov. 5, 2004, 02:41:32 PM EST

"Little Language" definition, components - (FuManChu) - (2) - Nov. 5, 2004, 05:34:56 PM EST

On what makes it easy to do little languages. - (JimWeirich) - (1) - Nov. 9, 2004, 07:34:59 AM EST

Good point. - (FuManChu) - Nov. 9, 2004, 11:01:58 AM EST

Orthogonal to DB usage - (tablizer) - (22) - Nov. 2, 2004, 11:54:53 AM EST

That's actually a good idea - (drewk) - (17) - Nov. 2, 2004, 12:46:40 PM EST

*Snork* beat me to it :) -NT - (FuManChu) - Nov. 2, 2004, 01:24:08 PM EST

Cure worse than the medicine. - (tablizer) - (15) - Nov. 4, 2004, 09:58:12 PM EST

"tends to bloat up code" - (admin) - (14) - Nov. 4, 2004, 11:03:11 PM EST

Your "solution" to such bloat was HQL, yes or no? -NT - (tablizer) - (13) - Nov. 4, 2004, 11:49:05 PM EST

It was a solution, yes. -NT - (admin) - Nov. 5, 2004, 12:06:32 AM EST

Since you seem to be slow... - (ben_tilly) - (11) - Nov. 5, 2004, 11:45:07 AM EST

I did NOT "lose". His solution was variation on SQL - (tablizer) - (10) - Nov. 5, 2004, 05:00:11 PM EST

In your universe, perhaps - (ben_tilly) - (9) - Nov. 5, 2004, 05:11:07 PM EST

The mapper did not reduce his code size - (tablizer) - (8) - Nov. 5, 2004, 05:16:02 PM EST

Bryce, you lost this one already. - (ben_tilly) - (7) - Nov. 5, 2004, 05:20:03 PM EST

I did NOT fscken lose. He gave no code-size proof. Zilch. - (tablizer) - (6) - Nov. 5, 2004, 07:15:01 PM EST

Why is code size your (apparently) sole criterion? - (drewk) - (5) - Nov. 6, 2004, 12:23:25 AM EST

You are welcome to present ANY metric you can justify - (tablizer) - (4) - Nov. 8, 2004, 02:43:37 AM EST

Thank you - (drewk) - (1) - Nov. 8, 2004, 09:05:55 AM EST

Usually people don't question those much - (tablizer) - Nov. 8, 2004, 11:47:03 PM EST

We've already been over change scenarios - (admin) - (1) - Nov. 8, 2004, 09:25:46 AM EST

re: We've already been over change scenarios - (tablizer) - Nov. 8, 2004, 11:52:31 PM EST

"Orthogonal" in exactly the same sense as differential gears - (FuManChu) - (3) - Nov. 2, 2004, 01:23:35 PM EST

You just shortened this thread by 200 posts. Cut & Paste. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Nov. 2, 2004, 02:03:26 PM EST

"[Nobody] ...points out that the cut-and-paste method... - (FuManChu) - Nov. 2, 2004, 02:26:58 PM EST

No, you got me all wrong, dude - (tablizer) - Nov. 4, 2004, 10:46:13 PM EST

Repeat after me: - (admin) - (1) - Nov. 2, 2004, 12:03:09 AM EST

I never said OO was JUST about inheritance. - (tablizer) - Nov. 2, 2004, 12:36:44 AM EST

Amusing to note... - (JimWeirich) - (41) - Nov. 2, 2004, 12:52:46 PM EST

re: nouns and noun grouping - (tablizer) - (40) - Nov. 4, 2004, 11:36:55 PM EST

Bryce: control tables are bad - (admin) - (37) - Nov. 5, 2004, 12:06:15 AM EST

Time will erase performance differences - (tablizer) - (36) - Nov. 5, 2004, 05:11:12 PM EST

That's not the main reason why they're bad. - (admin) - (35) - Nov. 5, 2004, 05:24:24 PM EST

Because VC tools are hierarchy-biased. - (tablizer) - (34) - Nov. 5, 2004, 08:05:42 PM EST

Go read the thread. - (admin) - (33) - Nov. 5, 2004, 09:19:45 PM EST

You always talk as if I push a grand conspiracy - (tablizer) - (32) - Nov. 5, 2004, 09:40:45 PM EST

Relational has its place. - (admin) - (31) - Nov. 5, 2004, 10:41:05 PM EST

Math and Boolean expressions - (tablizer) - (30) - Nov. 6, 2004, 12:22:20 AM EST

Ever use Zachary? - (admin) - (29) - Nov. 6, 2004, 12:09:32 PM EST

I will believe it only when I see it with my own eyes - (tablizer) - (28) - Nov. 8, 2004, 02:40:25 AM EST

- said the blind man (ducks and runs) -NT - (Arkadiy) - Nov. 8, 2004, 09:23:42 AM EST

NO. - (admin) - (26) - Nov. 8, 2004, 09:26:39 AM EST

You never identified an in-born fault of tables. -NT - (tablizer) - (25) - Nov. 8, 2004, 11:55:08 PM EST

Tables don't make good chairs. - (Another Scott) - (24) - Nov. 9, 2004, 12:16:12 AM EST

Vacuum Tubes - (tablizer) - (23) - Nov. 20, 2004, 09:01:02 PM EST

You can pry my tube guitar amp outta my cold, dead fingers. - (Steve Lowe) - (22) - Nov. 21, 2004, 01:28:02 AM EST

Digital precision can be boring - (tablizer) - (18) - Nov. 22, 2004, 09:06:27 PM EST

Yes - tubes are IT man - (tuberculosis) - (17) - Aug. 21, 2007, 05:54:19 AM EDT

Heh! That was my first bass amp! - (jb4) - (16) - Nov. 23, 2004, 07:04:01 PM EST

I don't know whether to be amused or appalled - (tuberculosis) - (15) - Aug. 21, 2007, 05:56:00 AM EDT

Both actually - (jb4) - (14) - Nov. 30, 2004, 05:54:59 PM EST

In negotiations - (jake123) - (13) - Dec. 1, 2004, 12:17:12 AM EST

Drooooooooool - (Steve Lowe) - (12) - Dec. 1, 2004, 12:26:42 AM EST

Didn't get it - (jake123) - (11) - Dec. 3, 2004, 02:12:12 PM EST

Bum R! -NT - (jb4) - (10) - Dec. 3, 2004, 06:24:37 PM EST

Oh well. - (jake123) - (9) - Dec. 3, 2004, 07:29:55 PM EST

Talk to your amp tech - (Steve Lowe) - (8) - Dec. 4, 2004, 01:48:50 AM EST

Oh yeah - (jake123) - (1) - Dec. 4, 2004, 08:29:05 PM EST

Had a teacher who did that - (drewk) - Dec. 5, 2004, 11:22:11 AM EST

Re: Talk to your amp tech - (Ashton) - (5) - Dec. 6, 2004, 12:09:58 AM EST

What I'm gaining - (jake123) - (4) - Dec. 6, 2004, 11:59:46 AM EST

Have you considered an attenuator? - (Steve Lowe) - (3) - Dec. 6, 2004, 02:11:53 PM EST

Yes I have - (jake123) - (2) - Dec. 6, 2004, 02:49:16 PM EST

New thread time, maybe...? -NT - (admin) - Dec. 6, 2004, 02:56:13 PM EST

This might not cost a bundle.. (new thread) - (Ashton) - Dec. 6, 2004, 11:32:23 PM EST

Mesa Boogie Forever -NT - (tuberculosis) - (2) - Aug. 21, 2007, 05:54:14 AM EDT

That'll prolly be my second choice - (jake123) - Dec. 1, 2004, 09:14:47 AM EST

Feh! The Ultimate was... - (jb4) - Dec. 2, 2004, 06:09:36 PM EST

re: nouns and noun grouping - (JimWeirich) - (1) - Nov. 5, 2004, 12:53:18 AM EST

Can't do a whole lot with your hidden anecdotes - (tablizer) - Nov. 8, 2004, 02:49:14 AM EST

Welcome to IWETHEY!