IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Yick
I orginal thought about doing it that way, since my orginal was a single dir. The launch overhead, read database of historical files, scan dir, check current list, write database of new files, it is all a huge amount of unnecessary overhead.

Don't worry about the odd sleep calc when they don't mesh. I think in 15 second increments. Almost all dirs will be 1 minute, but a couple will be 15 seconds.

The code was easy, and the X errors in Y time was a breeze, aging off errors too old, etc.

New Sounds reasonable
I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
     Hey Ben: Perl fork / return value question - (broomberg) - (10)
         Just follow the documentation... - (ben_tilly) - (9)
             Smack! (forehead) -NT - (broomberg)
             Doesn't seem to work - (broomberg) - (7)
                 I think you wanted $kid == $pid, not $kid == -1 - (ben_tilly) - (6)
                     Got it. - (broomberg) - (5)
                         D'oh, I missed the call to sleep in your loop - (ben_tilly) - (4)
                             No prob - (broomberg) - (3)
                                 Got it, but define shortest? - (ben_tilly) - (2)
                                     Yick - (broomberg) - (1)
                                         Sounds reasonable -NT - (ben_tilly)

We of the Church of Emacs feel that vi usage isn't a sin, but rather a penance.
58 ms