IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Now viewing page 46 of 92
[Prev] 1 ... 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 ... 92 [Next]
     What is with gcc, anyway?!? - (jb4) - (52)
         What is typeof(0x80000000)? - (ChrisR) - (7)
             right, add an L -NT - (deSitter) - (6)
                 Ain't that a UL - (ChrisR) - (5)
                     This is why C is sometimes called "high-level assembler." - (static) - (1)
                         Re: This is why C is sometimes called "high-level assembler. - (jb4)
                     Actually, that would be a U (or u) - (jb4) - (2)
                         What about casting the values? - (ChrisR) - (1)
                             Yes, that was the solution I used - (jb4)
         Re: What is with gcc, anyway?!? - (lordbeatnik) - (3)
             I guess... - (jb4) - (2)
                 If there was no ambiguity... - (lordbeatnik) - (1)
                     For the next set of standards? - (jb4)
         Hex constants are assumed to be positive - (Arkadiy) - (36)
             Re: Hex constants are assumed to be positive - (jb4) - (35)
                 Setting the high bit is processor dependent. - (hnick) - (34)
                     OK, then the standard should be saying - (Arkadiy) - (33)
                         No I actually write code based on them - (jb4) - (30)
                             Ignore them and use my common sence -NT - (Arkadiy) - (29)
                                 I'll bet debugging your code is a real joy... - (jb4) - (28)
                                     Nope - (Arkadiy) - (27)
                                         And so tell me, O Oracle of Common Sence [sic] - (jb4) - (26)
                                             offensive foul, ball to Ark - (deSitter) - (3)
                                                 Rest assured, - (Arkadiy) - (1)
                                                     :) ok -NT - (deSitter)
                                                 OK, OK... - (jb4)
                                             Well, while the tone is disagreable, the question is - (Arkadiy) - (21)
                                                 Point missed. - (jb4) - (20)
                                                     If C were sane, TRUE = -1 and problem vanishes -NT - (deSitter) - (7)
                                                         Ermm...say What? - (jb4) - (2)
                                                             Re: Ermm...say What? - (deSitter) - (1)
                                                                 Much like Jewish law - (Arkadiy)
                                                         So you prefer how VB does it?? -NT - (ben_tilly) - (3)
                                                             Point: Ben... -NT - (jb4)
                                                             How it used to do it. - (ChrisR) - (1)
                                                                 Hehee! - (jb4)
                                                     Why do you expect hex to be treated differently from decimal - (Arkadiy) - (11)
                                                         Re: Why do you expect hex to be treated differently - (deSitter)
                                                         Man, that's a good question! - (jb4)
                                                         Now that's clarity! -NT - (a6l6e6x) - (8)
                                                             Nope, it's bad math - (deSitter) - (7)
                                                                 But, counters of real things don't need negative values. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - (6)
                                                                     I'd like to add a negative number of votes for Bush. ;-) -NT - (ben_tilly) - (1)
                                                                         That only works on Diebold machines. :) -NT - (a6l6e6x)
                                                                     Certainly - (deSitter) - (3)
                                                                         "Expressive", not "pithy" :) - (Arkadiy) - (2)
                                                                             Re: "Expressive", not "pithy" :) - (deSitter) - (1)
                                                                                 Dunno. - (Arkadiy)
                         Wasn't trying to piss you off... - (hnick) - (1)
                             Interesting assumption: - (jb4)
         Hmm...while the datatype will be first reached, - (Simon_Jester) - (1)
             True, but... - (jb4)
         Re: What is with gcc, anyway?!? - (gdaustin)
     Bug in Net::SSH::Perl - (broomberg)
     Python decorator proposal - (FuManChu) - (10)
         as a non python user, whats wrong with the old way? -NT - (boxley) - (1)
             Not really wrong, just annoying - (FuManChu)
         I don't understand the example :( - (Arkadiy) - (5)
             classmthod - (FuManChu) - (4)
                 A more concrete example from Ruby - (ben_tilly) - (3)
                     Oh, I underrstand class/object methods - (Arkadiy) - (2)
                         You can't do that to builtins yet - (FuManChu)
                         You can do that in Ruby - (ben_tilly)
         An update on the proposed change - (ChrisR) - (1)
             Why, yes, he did. :) - (FuManChu)
     Programming and geography - (JayMehaffey) - (2)
         The China-Taiwan issue cost Debian a key developer :-( -NT - (ben_tilly) - (1)
             Not to mention a bunch of translators. -NT - (folkert)
     Sticky Minds - useful resource on testing - (ben_tilly) - (2)
         monkey testing vs planned regression testing, cool -NT - (boxley) - (1)
             rofl -NT - (deSitter)
     Java collections vs arrays - (bluke) - (10)
         Arrays annoy me to no end. - (admin) - (8)
             How is an Iterator much better? - (bluke) - (7)
                 Re: How is an Iterator much better? - (admin) - (6)
                     That is coming to Java in 1.5 - (bluke) - (5)
                         Oh, joy -- looks like the STL. - (admin) - (4)
                             Dang. Now I've got a WSOD. - (FuManChu) - (2)
                                 ICMLPRD - (inthane-chan) - (1)
                                     ICMLPRD (new thread) - (inthane-chan)
                             It's not so bad - (bluke)
         Re: Java collections vs arrays - (dshellman)
     What is CMDB? - (bluke) - (2)
         Configuration Management Database -NT - (boxley) - (1)
             Ahhhh. They stole Bryces IDEA! -NT - (folkert)
     Mono? - (broomberg) - (33)
         Why not Delphi in stead? (And Kylix in stead of Mono.) -NT - (CRConrad) - (19)
             It's dead - (broomberg) - (18)
                 Those words may come back to haunt you... ;-) - (admin)
                 Re: It's dead - (deSitter) - (3)
                     Ahhh...ahhhh....ahhh.....aychoochtml -NT - (FuManChu)
                     We discussed both - (broomberg) - (1)
                         Acrobat forms = javascript - (deSitter)
                 That would indicate (to the savvy manager, at least)... - (jb4) - (1)
                     Different levels of noise - (broomberg)
                 The glimpses you provide into corporate decision making - (tuberculosis) - (10)
                     Re: The glimpses you provide into corporate decision making - (deSitter) - (8)
                         I don't think it has to work that way - (tuberculosis) - (7)
                             Huh? - (broomberg) - (6)
                                 Its a lot easier to teach a programmer business than - (tuberculosis) - (5)
                                     "Conventional" is there for a reason - (broomberg) - (4)
                                         I object to your characterization - (tuberculosis) - (3)
                                             No, but you'll take a chance on an - (broomberg) - (2)
                                                 If I were you - (tuberculosis) - (1)
                                                     Done - (broomberg)
                     Sorry - (broomberg)
         Mono will be more... - (folkert) - (6)
             To paraphrase: "Mono. a better .NET than .NET" - (jb4) - (5)
                 You like? Yeah, wow, great - just look how that helped OS/2! -NT - (CRConrad) - (4)
                     What?!? "A better OS2 than OS2"? - (jb4) - (3)
                         Windows 3.1 -> WinOS2 -NT - (deSitter) - (1)
                             OT: Remember MS Sql Server running on OS/2? - (mmoffitt)
                         No, you nitwit, the other way around! - (CRConrad)
         snoball for a front end? - (boxley)
         Re: Mono? - (altmann)
         I'm confused. - (Another Scott) - (3)
             Very observant - (broomberg) - (2)
                 Suggestion - (ben_tilly) - (1)
                     Hmm. - (broomberg)
     Hey boys, what time is it? - (tuberculosis) - (3)
         Did you see the recent video (demo of Croquet)? - (FuManChu) - (2)
             No, saw it demo'd live last summer - (tuberculosis) - (1)
                 Ah. Looking again I must have seen 1/3 of that - (FuManChu)
     I forgot how ugly typical Swing apps are - (bluke) - (1)
         That and layout is crap - (tuberculosis)
Now viewing page 46 of 92
[Prev] 1 ... 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 ... 92 [Next]

class Lrpdism(GenericSaying):
1,190 ms