(new) Theory and Practice of Programming

The Daily WTF [time sink] - (FuManChu) - (6) - Sept. 7, 2004, 09:12:51 PM EDT

Wow - (broomberg) - Sept. 7, 2004, 09:33:49 PM EDT

Well, at least they catch all the possible errors! -NT - (ChrisR) - (3) - Sept. 7, 2004, 09:46:30 PM EDT

Go to the main page - (broomberg) - (2) - Sept. 7, 2004, 09:50:10 PM EDT

Another one you'll love, Barry - (FuManChu) - (1) - Sept. 8, 2004, 12:44:37 AM EDT

I've seen FAR worse - (broomberg) - Sept. 8, 2004, 09:49:26 AM EDT

Wow. And I thought my removeSpaces was bad -NT - (Arkadiy) - Sept. 8, 2004, 09:33:50 AM EDT

C# IDE - (broomberg) - Sept. 7, 2004, 08:36:34 AM EDT

Setting up hash table with addresses in VB.net - (broomberg) - (5) - Sept. 6, 2004, 04:50:41 PM EDT

Never mind - (broomberg) - (4) - Sept. 6, 2004, 05:13:58 PM EDT

TypeOf/GetType/GetType - (altmann) - (3) - Sept. 6, 2004, 07:41:31 PM EDT

Here is what I did - (broomberg) - (2) - Sept. 7, 2004, 12:24:28 AM EDT

Re: Here is what I did - (altmann) - (1) - Sept. 7, 2004, 02:24:54 AM EDT

That's not so bad - (broomberg) - Sept. 7, 2004, 06:30:34 AM EDT

VB - NO CONTINUE STATEMENT!! ARRGG!!! - (broomberg) - (38) - Sept. 6, 2004, 02:40:04 PM EDT

Basic was invented that way - (ChrisR) - (16) - Sept. 6, 2004, 02:52:15 PM EDT

Has had "continue" for many years - (broomberg) - (15) - Sept. 6, 2004, 03:07:04 PM EDT

In VB 6 you have - (lincoln) - (1) - Sept. 6, 2004, 08:17:01 PM EDT

Exit loop is there - (broomberg) - Sept. 7, 2004, 12:12:00 AM EDT

Or you COULD... - (jb4) - (12) - Sept. 7, 2004, 11:47:59 AM EDT

In other words, give a "break"! :) -NT - (a6l6e6x) - Sept. 7, 2004, 12:33:16 PM EDT

No way! - (broomberg) - (10) - Sept. 7, 2004, 01:37:24 PM EDT

Yet Another Way To Do It - (ben_tilly) - Sept. 7, 2004, 03:18:43 PM EDT

Warning! Possible religious war pending - (jb4) - (8) - Sept. 8, 2004, 01:34:54 PM EDT

Nah, this is more important - (broomberg) - (7) - Sept. 8, 2004, 02:53:39 PM EDT

Some older languages had those constructs - (jb4) - (6) - Sept. 13, 2004, 06:09:03 PM EDT

That doesn't need to be addressed - (ben_tilly) - (5) - Sept. 13, 2004, 06:43:27 PM EDT

If I didn't know better ... - (drewk) - (3) - Sept. 13, 2004, 10:40:51 PM EDT

Good thing that you know better then :-) - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Sept. 14, 2004, 12:21:30 AM EDT

You forgot: - (jb4) - (1) - Sept. 14, 2004, 04:34:57 PM EDT

Rules of thumb are rules of thumb - (ben_tilly) - Sept. 14, 2004, 05:32:55 PM EDT

That'd be the Cyclomatic Complexity - (jb4) - Sept. 14, 2004, 04:28:48 PM EDT

Answer: - (FuManChu) - (17) - Sept. 6, 2004, 03:23:49 PM EDT

VB is not a Programming Language, it's a Product. -NT - (ChrisR) - (16) - Sept. 6, 2004, 03:25:21 PM EDT

So if I WAS to fight, again, what are my alternatives? - (broomberg) - (15) - Sept. 6, 2004, 04:14:48 PM EDT

Rython ror Rerl ror Reecee-ell ror a rombo of rall rhree ; - (folkert) - (7) - Sept. 6, 2004, 04:36:14 PM EDT

TCL - Never!!!! - (broomberg) - (6) - Sept. 6, 2004, 04:45:03 PM EDT

Careful what you ask for... - (folkert) - (2) - Sept. 6, 2004, 07:51:30 PM EDT

I see you ignored the previous. Barry - (folkert) - (1) - Sept. 7, 2004, 02:40:14 PM EDT

Who says? - (broomberg) - Sept. 7, 2004, 03:34:48 PM EDT

Come on, TCL and BASIC are as far apart - (Arkadiy) - (2) - Sept. 7, 2004, 02:54:32 PM EDT

Lisp is not procedural?? - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Sept. 7, 2004, 03:16:37 PM EDT

Parenthetically speaking that is. :) -NT - (a6l6e6x) - Sept. 7, 2004, 03:56:42 PM EDT

C# is a better match - (ChrisR) - Sept. 6, 2004, 05:13:52 PM EDT

ObCRC: Delphi - (Another Scott) - (2) - Sept. 6, 2004, 06:15:02 PM EDT

I just pitched C# - (broomberg) - (1) - Sept. 6, 2004, 06:43:11 PM EDT

You just described all of MS' programming languages. - (static) - Sept. 6, 2004, 08:27:32 PM EDT

Python wins on several of those axes - (FuManChu) - Sept. 6, 2004, 09:15:54 PM EDT

Sounds exactly like... - (jb4) - (1) - Sept. 7, 2004, 11:51:07 AM EDT

Oh, what's the use?! "Nobody is as blind...", and so on. :-( -NT - (CRConrad) - Sept. 8, 2004, 07:18:30 AM EDT

Side effect - (JayMehaffey) - Sept. 6, 2004, 04:31:44 PM EDT

FWIW, VB.Net 2005 will have it -NT - (altmann) - (1) - Sept. 6, 2004, 08:26:30 PM EDT

ObLRPD: It'll be in the next release.... -NT - (jb4) - Sept. 7, 2004, 11:53:28 AM EDT

VB.net book rec? - (broomberg) - (1) - Sept. 6, 2004, 12:57:29 PM EDT

Re: VB.net book rec? - (JayMehaffey) - Sept. 6, 2004, 04:40:20 PM EDT

Embedding NL in text in VB - (broomberg) - (5) - Sept. 4, 2004, 09:01:50 PM EDT

Never mind - (broomberg) - Sept. 4, 2004, 09:11:47 PM EDT

What's NL - (ChrisR) - (2) - Sept. 4, 2004, 09:12:32 PM EDT

Yes but - (broomberg) - (1) - Sept. 4, 2004, 09:44:12 PM EDT

Re: Yes but - (altmann) - Sept. 5, 2004, 03:16:43 AM EDT

Yes - (ben_tilly) - Sept. 4, 2004, 09:43:16 PM EDT

Make alternative - scons - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Sept. 4, 2004, 07:27:01 PM EDT

We've been looking at that here. - (admin) - Sept. 6, 2004, 10:48:10 PM EDT

VB File pick list question - (broomberg) - (19) - Sept. 2, 2004, 10:12:44 PM EDT

its built into browsers - (boxley) - (1) - Sept. 3, 2004, 09:44:42 AM EDT

I got THAT part - (broomberg) - Sept. 4, 2004, 10:37:10 AM EDT

Modal dialog box - (ChrisR) - (1) - Sept. 3, 2004, 11:19:16 AM EDT

I must be emanating stupidity here - (broomberg) - Sept. 4, 2004, 10:38:17 AM EDT

What's in the control file? - (lincoln) - (1) - Sept. 3, 2004, 05:18:35 PM EDT

Ahh, close - (broomberg) - Sept. 4, 2004, 10:39:32 AM EDT

Follow up - (broomberg) - (12) - Sept. 4, 2004, 12:54:33 PM EDT

Re: Follow up - (altmann) - Sept. 4, 2004, 04:08:59 PM EDT

Re: INI files - (altmann) - (10) - Sept. 4, 2004, 04:36:47 PM EDT

Is there such a thing as a multiline INI entry? -NT - (broomberg) - (9) - Sept. 4, 2004, 05:15:34 PM EDT

Re: Is there such a thing as a multiline INI entry? - (altmann) - (8) - Sept. 4, 2004, 06:04:46 PM EDT

That's nasty - (broomberg) - (7) - Sept. 4, 2004, 06:21:22 PM EDT

Re: That's nasty - (altmann) - (6) - Sept. 4, 2004, 08:02:28 PM EDT

I'm VB Net as well - (broomberg) - (5) - Sept. 4, 2004, 08:16:42 PM EDT

My fault - (altmann) - (4) - Sept. 5, 2004, 02:25:54 AM EDT

No choice - (broomberg) - (3) - Sept. 5, 2004, 02:27:59 AM EDT

VB.Net is far better anyways IMHO - (altmann) - (2) - Sept. 5, 2004, 02:58:15 AM EDT

And re the INI files - (altmann) - Sept. 5, 2004, 03:09:31 AM EDT

Thanks, remove is good - (broomberg) - Sept. 5, 2004, 03:20:05 AM EDT

Any reason not to use Sourceforge? - (FuManChu) - (1) - Sept. 1, 2004, 01:19:48 PM EDT

Only one I can htink of... - (folkert) - Sept. 1, 2004, 10:09:21 PM EDT

Intellij vs Eclipse - (bluke) - (8) - Aug. 31, 2004, 08:45:39 AM EDT

I'd have thought JBuilder is best for StarTeam integration? - (CRConrad) - (3) - Aug. 31, 2004, 09:17:13 AM EDT

Maybe but JBuilder isn't in the running - (bluke) - (2) - Sept. 1, 2004, 02:37:18 AM EDT

Hey, I'm still trying to get the C++ IDE plugin to work... - (jb4) - Sept. 1, 2004, 01:24:26 PM EDT

Just as well - its crap - (tuberculosis) - Aug. 21, 2007, 05:42:59 AM EDT

Never used IntelliJ... - (Yendor) - Aug. 31, 2004, 10:47:22 AM EDT

Intellij - (tuberculosis) - (2) - Aug. 31, 2004, 11:19:06 AM EDT

Agree about Intellij - (bluke) - Sept. 1, 2004, 02:32:33 AM EDT

Bloat comparison of Eclipse and VisualWorks - (ChrisR) - Sept. 14, 2004, 11:44:20 PM EDT

Welcome to IWETHEY!