IWETHEY v. 0.3.0
|
TODO
1,095 registered users | 0
active users
| 0 LpH |
Statistics
Login
|
Create New User
Welcome to IWETHEY!
IWETHEY Home
/
IWETHEY Board
/
Theory and Practice of Programming Forum
Now viewing page 37 of 92
[
Prev
]
1
...
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
...
92
[
Next
]
Comparing Big Lists in Perl
- (
pwhysall
)
- (21)
- March 21, 2005, 05:04:42 AM EST
I'd probably do something like this
- (
broomberg
)
- (20)
- March 21, 2005, 08:28:08 AM EST
Thanks
- (
pwhysall
)
- (14)
- March 21, 2005, 08:35:29 AM EST
ROFL
- (
admin
)
- (12)
- March 21, 2005, 08:47:30 AM EST
Why rofl?
- (
pwhysall
)
- (11)
- March 21, 2005, 08:48:06 AM EST
That's not the issue.
- (
admin
)
- (10)
- March 21, 2005, 08:50:14 AM EST
All of them. You.
- (
pwhysall
)
- (3)
- March 21, 2005, 09:00:35 AM EST
So, you want EMACS in *Z*?
-NT
- (
folkert
)
- (2)
- March 21, 2005, 09:09:27 AM EST
*I* can't think of a single *valid* objection.
-NT
- (
pwhysall
)
- March 21, 2005, 09:10:38 AM EST
No, gvim
- (
broomberg
)
- March 21, 2005, 10:26:08 AM EST
You're being too lazy
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (5)
- March 21, 2005, 01:48:04 PM EST
Au contraire
- (
admin
)
- (4)
- March 21, 2005, 02:44:13 PM EST
You can still leverage the effort though...
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (3)
- March 21, 2005, 02:56:29 PM EST
"just"...
-NT
- (
admin
)
- (2)
- March 21, 2005, 03:17:53 PM EST
Compared to what you save...
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (1)
- March 21, 2005, 03:22:15 PM EST
Compared to doing nothing and laughing at Peter...
- (
admin
)
- March 21, 2005, 03:25:15 PM EST
Don't forget the pretty print feature as well...
- (
ChrisR
)
- March 21, 2005, 02:37:32 PM EST
Here's the whole (working, ugly) program
- (
pwhysall
)
- (4)
- March 21, 2005, 09:19:51 AM EST
Suggestion
- (
broomberg
)
- (2)
- March 21, 2005, 10:20:57 AM EST
Thanks.
- (
pwhysall
)
- (1)
- March 21, 2005, 10:22:34 AM EST
My pleasure
- (
broomberg
)
- March 21, 2005, 10:26:55 AM EST
sig_array global bad.
- (
broomberg
)
- March 21, 2005, 10:51:23 AM EST
And another question, this time shell
- (
Arkadiy
)
- (2)
- March 18, 2005, 04:18:37 PM EST
I'd have to write a program...
- (
ben_tilly
)
- March 18, 2005, 06:27:29 PM EST
man bash
- (
broomberg
)
- March 18, 2005, 07:23:09 PM EST
Another Perl question
- (
Arkadiy
)
- (5)
- March 18, 2005, 03:01:43 PM EST
There is no good way to do that
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (4)
- March 18, 2005, 03:08:08 PM EST
What about IO::ALL?
- (
folkert
)
- (3)
- March 18, 2005, 04:11:23 PM EST
Is that a CPAN module? Update: yes it is
- (
Arkadiy
)
- (1)
- March 18, 2005, 04:14:57 PM EST
I was reading the description and there are tremendously
- (
folkert
)
- March 18, 2005, 04:32:16 PM EST
No
- (
ben_tilly
)
- March 18, 2005, 05:38:13 PM EST
Grrr!
- (
Arkadiy
)
- (1)
- March 18, 2005, 02:48:22 PM EST
That one is a very common complaint
- (
ben_tilly
)
- March 18, 2005, 02:57:14 PM EST
Todd, have a question
- (
daemon
)
- (4)
- March 18, 2005, 01:21:52 PM EST
I can send it this eve
- (
tuberculosis
)
- (3)
- Aug. 21, 2007, 12:44:51 PM EDT
both, this is a hmm how does that work
- (
boxley
)
- (2)
- March 18, 2005, 11:55:16 PM EST
I just sent you source code
-NT
- (
tuberculosis
)
- (1)
- Aug. 21, 2007, 12:46:34 PM EDT
thank you sir!
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- March 19, 2005, 12:33:19 AM EST
Question about exceptions
- (
drewk
)
- (31)
- March 16, 2005, 04:22:29 PM EST
Lots of discussions about that
- (
FuManChu
)
- (6)
- March 16, 2005, 04:38:14 PM EST
That only goes for one kind of exceptions!
- (
CRConrad
)
- (1)
- March 16, 2005, 04:43:24 PM EST
What does the "checked" mean to you?
- (
FuManChu
)
- March 16, 2005, 05:55:46 PM EST
But he's saying that you should use both
- (
drewk
)
- (3)
- March 16, 2005, 05:18:00 PM EST
My rule of thumb is,
- (
Arkadiy
)
- March 16, 2005, 05:40:27 PM EST
Pick one and stick with it.
- (
admin
)
- March 16, 2005, 06:04:02 PM EST
You can do both (or more accurately: either) with or without
- (
FuManChu
)
- March 16, 2005, 06:05:51 PM EST
Re: Question about exceptions
- (
JimWeirich
)
- (23)
- March 16, 2005, 07:35:00 PM EST
Nice point about responsibility, but grey areas abound
- (
FuManChu
)
- (11)
- March 16, 2005, 07:46:02 PM EST
Re: Nice point about responsibility, but grey areas abound
- (
JimWeirich
)
- (10)
- March 17, 2005, 03:30:15 PM EST
No, we don't
- (
drewk
)
- (9)
- March 17, 2005, 05:25:32 PM EST
The difference is simple
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (8)
- March 17, 2005, 05:57:25 PM EST
Problem with that
- (
drewk
)
- (4)
- March 17, 2005, 06:13:50 PM EST
See? Whether it is an error IS ambiguous!
-NT
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (2)
- March 17, 2005, 06:19:06 PM EST
I think I know what to do then
- (
drewk
)
- (1)
- March 17, 2005, 06:28:16 PM EST
Exactly
-NT
- (
ben_tilly
)
- March 17, 2005, 06:59:56 PM EST
Re: Problem with that
- (
JimWeirich
)
- March 17, 2005, 11:59:18 PM EST
Thats the sort of logic that makes me wary of exceptions.
- (
static
)
- (2)
- March 17, 2005, 08:18:40 PM EST
Exceptions are one form of Continuation
- (
ChrisR
)
- (1)
- March 17, 2005, 10:33:45 PM EST
Icon's generators rely on the failure model.
- (
static
)
- March 18, 2005, 01:24:49 AM EST
Disabling assertions
- (
ChrisR
)
- (3)
- March 16, 2005, 07:52:17 PM EST
That's one of the points he raised
- (
drewk
)
- (2)
- March 16, 2005, 08:59:04 PM EST
Expense is relative
- (
ChrisR
)
- March 16, 2005, 11:52:33 PM EST
Re: That's one of the points he raised
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- March 17, 2005, 08:31:12 AM EST
DbC?
-NT
- (
drewk
)
- (6)
- March 16, 2005, 09:32:24 PM EST
Design by Contract
- (
Yendor
)
- (5)
- March 16, 2005, 10:05:14 PM EST
Not the same thing.
- (
admin
)
- (4)
- March 16, 2005, 10:31:01 PM EST
That's not strictly Eiffel;
- (
jake123
)
- (3)
- March 17, 2005, 05:31:51 PM EST
It's built into Eiffel
- (
admin
)
- March 17, 2005, 06:01:57 PM EST
It is DESIGN by Contract after all
- (
JimWeirich
)
- (1)
- March 17, 2005, 11:48:41 PM EST
As you say
- (
jake123
)
- March 19, 2005, 03:09:19 AM EST
AJAX programming
- (
admin
)
- (21)
- March 16, 2005, 09:06:39 AM EST
Its the wave of the future
- (
tuberculosis
)
- (13)
- Aug. 21, 2007, 06:39:34 AM EDT
If that's the case...
- (
admin
)
- (10)
- March 16, 2005, 11:42:11 AM EST
FOSS?
- (
tuberculosis
)
- (8)
- Aug. 21, 2007, 06:41:05 AM EDT
Thanks.
-NT
- (
admin
)
- March 16, 2005, 02:19:34 PM EST
Just started using the calendar widget - very nice
-NT
- (
SpiceWare
)
- (6)
- Oct. 16, 2005, 09:40:47 PM EDT
Lots of new JS toolkits have come out
- (
tuberculosis
)
- (5)
- Oct. 19, 2005, 12:38:21 PM EDT
Sheesh.
- (
admin
)
- (2)
- Oct. 18, 2005, 07:05:41 PM EDT
Go to demos
- (
broomberg
)
- (1)
- Oct. 18, 2005, 10:47:38 PM EDT
Didn't see that link anywhere...
-NT
- (
admin
)
- Oct. 18, 2005, 11:03:20 PM EDT
Seems it's "script.aculo.us", not "script.acul.ous". HTH!
-NT
- (
CRConrad
)
- (1)
- Oct. 19, 2005, 03:45:01 AM EDT
Thx - Fixed
-NT
- (
tuberculosis
)
- Oct. 19, 2005, 12:39:01 PM EDT
Re: If that's the case...
- (
johnu
)
- March 16, 2005, 01:30:39 PM EST
Holy-- You-- Son of a Blanchard
- (
FuManChu
)
- (1)
- March 16, 2005, 11:46:24 AM EST
I have plenty of dull projects too
- (
tuberculosis
)
- Aug. 21, 2007, 12:39:47 PM EDT
Too bad Ajah isn't a Greek hero
- (
FuManChu
)
- (3)
- March 16, 2005, 11:44:45 AM EST
Same question to you then:
- (
admin
)
- (2)
- March 16, 2005, 11:46:43 AM EST
Yes, but I haven't used any so can't recommend one
- (
FuManChu
)
- (1)
- March 16, 2005, 11:51:45 AM EST
Thanks.
-NT
- (
admin
)
- March 16, 2005, 11:57:29 AM EST
The quirksmode guy has an interesting take on it.
- (
static
)
- March 16, 2005, 09:55:48 PM EST
Another article on AJAX.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (1)
- March 17, 2005, 09:20:27 AM EST
Microsoft misses the boat. Again.
- (
ben_tilly
)
- March 17, 2005, 11:47:55 AM EST
JSON
- (
admin
)
- (19)
- March 16, 2005, 08:58:05 AM EST
That language is included in the first paragraph.
- (
folkert
)
- (10)
- March 16, 2005, 11:26:50 AM EST
Not the one *I'm* thinking of...
-NT
- (
admin
)
- (9)
- March 16, 2005, 11:41:21 AM EST
Hmmm...
- (
folkert
)
- (8)
- March 16, 2005, 11:47:01 AM EST
Re: Hmmm...
- (
admin
)
- (7)
- March 16, 2005, 11:47:22 AM EST
migosh.
- (
folkert
)
- (1)
- March 16, 2005, 11:53:02 AM EST
Re: migosh.
- (
admin
)
- March 16, 2005, 11:59:27 AM EST
Its not plists though
- (
tuberculosis
)
- (4)
- Aug. 21, 2007, 06:41:10 AM EDT
Re: Its not plists though
- (
admin
)
- (3)
- March 16, 2005, 02:18:31 PM EST
Re: Its not plists though
- (
tuberculosis
)
- (2)
- Aug. 21, 2007, 06:41:22 AM EDT
If that's the only change it's easy enough to make.
-NT
- (
admin
)
- (1)
- March 16, 2005, 04:04:27 PM EST
Not sure that's the only one
- (
tuberculosis
)
- Aug. 21, 2007, 12:37:46 PM EDT
I give up.
- (
FuManChu
)
- (4)
- March 16, 2005, 11:48:09 AM EST
?
- (
admin
)
- (3)
- March 16, 2005, 11:50:22 AM EST
It's a data format that has to be parsed by code.
- (
FuManChu
)
- (2)
- March 16, 2005, 11:53:46 AM EST
Every data format has to be parsed.
- (
admin
)
- (1)
- March 16, 2005, 11:58:37 AM EST
I'm misleading myself
- (
FuManChu
)
- March 16, 2005, 01:15:40 PM EST
I may be missing something
- (
drewk
)
- (2)
- March 16, 2005, 11:57:01 AM EST
Re: I may be missing something
- (
admin
)
- (1)
- March 16, 2005, 11:59:31 AM EST
We just did this today
- (
drewk
)
- March 16, 2005, 12:07:57 PM EST
repository versioning software
- (
folkert
)
- (5)
- March 14, 2005, 08:05:15 AM EST
It's cheaper at Bookpool. ;-) Can you elaborate?
- (
Another Scott
)
- (1)
- March 13, 2005, 07:35:03 PM EST
It isn't perfect.
- (
folkert
)
- March 13, 2005, 11:25:14 PM EST
"1.4GB array"? Maybe you meant 1.4 *T* B...? HTH!
-NT
- (
CRConrad
)
- (2)
- March 14, 2005, 04:17:54 AM EST
Ooops, yeah. 1.4TB array.
- (
folkert
)
- March 14, 2005, 08:04:36 AM EST
At least he didn't say 1.4Mb.
-NT
- (
static
)
- March 14, 2005, 09:19:33 PM EST
What the heck is text?
- (
systems
)
- (56)
- March 12, 2005, 11:48:38 AM EST
It depends on the context.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (2)
- March 12, 2005, 12:23:39 PM EST
Unicode and ASCII
- (
StevenYap
)
- (1)
- March 12, 2005, 06:54:00 PM EST
Re: Unicode and ASCII - Nitpick II
- (
jb4
)
- March 25, 2005, 01:40:46 PM EST
you are confusing text with display
- (
boxley
)
- (12)
- March 12, 2005, 06:53:13 PM EST
Uhhh..Not quite, Bill
- (
jb4
)
- (11)
- March 25, 2005, 01:50:46 PM EST
And that is one thing that sucks about Unicode
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (9)
- March 25, 2005, 03:09:44 PM EST
At least they're consistent
- (
jb4
)
- (8)
- March 25, 2005, 06:02:42 PM EST
But it is a problem
- (
ben_tilly
)
- March 25, 2005, 06:13:17 PM EST
Except for that full width/half width ascii thing
- (
tuberculosis
)
- (5)
- March 27, 2005, 09:40:24 PM EST
I dunno...
- (
jb4
)
- March 28, 2005, 12:11:15 PM EST
My personal take on it
- (
jake123
)
- (3)
- March 28, 2005, 12:15:20 PM EST
Perhaps, but it makes searching tricky
- (
tuberculosis
)
- (2)
- March 28, 2005, 02:49:36 PM EST
Well, if it was an easy problem
- (
jake123
)
- March 28, 2005, 03:29:43 PM EST
ICLRPD (new thread)
- (
jb4
)
- March 29, 2005, 07:57:14 PM EST
Have you all seen the HUGE unicode poster?
- (
FuManChu
)
- March 28, 2005, 04:33:12 PM EST
close enough to debug a table entry :-)
- (
boxley
)
- March 26, 2005, 09:26:51 AM EST
Text is not as simple as it seems
- (
ben_tilly
)
- March 12, 2005, 11:00:34 PM EST
This is one thing that Java handles pretty well
- (
bluke
)
- March 13, 2005, 11:35:09 AM EST
Rule #1 - Everything you think you know is wrong
- (
tuberculosis
)
- (29)
- Aug. 21, 2007, 06:28:08 AM EDT
Why xenophobic?
- (
drewk
)
- (28)
- March 14, 2005, 10:44:16 AM EST
Because they didn't think...
- (
pwhysall
)
- March 14, 2005, 11:24:31 AM EST
Because if they had spent any time at all
- (
tuberculosis
)
- (25)
- Aug. 21, 2007, 06:30:01 AM EDT
Now how about addressing my example
- (
drewk
)
- (17)
- March 14, 2005, 12:13:47 PM EST
The best explanation that I've seen of why 2 digits...
- (
ben_tilly
)
- March 14, 2005, 12:46:32 PM EST
No, but they were xenophobic etc
- (
jake123
)
- (15)
- March 14, 2005, 02:50:01 PM EST
xenophobic's probably the wrong word
- (
SpiceWare
)
- (14)
- March 14, 2005, 04:12:18 PM EST
Yeah, you're right
- (
jake123
)
- (13)
- March 14, 2005, 05:02:32 PM EST
How about "escessively humble"?
- (
drewk
)
- (4)
- March 14, 2005, 05:35:25 PM EST
Look, the point about the two digits for a year is well
- (
jake123
)
- (1)
- March 14, 2005, 06:09:09 PM EST
Disagree
- (
jb4
)
- March 25, 2005, 02:15:41 PM EST
Maybe...
- (
tuberculosis
)
- (1)
- Aug. 21, 2007, 06:31:43 AM EDT
How about simply "provincial".
- (
a6l6e6x
)
- March 14, 2005, 08:02:42 PM EST
The people who coded for teletypes and green terminals
- (
Arkadiy
)
- (7)
- March 14, 2005, 05:37:55 PM EST
Yes, a typographer
- (
jake123
)
- (3)
- March 14, 2005, 06:10:49 PM EST
Internationalization would not have been so easy
- (
ben_tilly
)
- March 14, 2005, 07:23:05 PM EST
Text layout in 80 by 24 grid of monspaced font?
- (
Arkadiy
)
- (1)
- March 14, 2005, 07:59:49 PM EST
Phone books back then
- (
jake123
)
- March 15, 2005, 11:18:10 AM EST
Please don't use the letter "e" in your code.
- (
pwhysall
)
- (2)
- March 14, 2005, 06:20:45 PM EST
I certainly used to do without "e"
- (
Arkadiy
)
- March 14, 2005, 08:01:39 PM EST
I couldn't use "e" either ...
- (
JimWeirich
)
- March 15, 2005, 05:52:09 PM EST
Oh, come ON already
- (
jb4
)
- (6)
- March 25, 2005, 02:20:51 PM EST
The C++ standard i18n library is awful
- (
tuberculosis
)
- (5)
- March 27, 2005, 09:56:44 PM EST
Dont know ICU
- (
jb4
)
- (4)
- March 28, 2005, 12:13:20 PM EST
ICLRPD (new thread)
- (
drewk
)
- March 28, 2005, 12:33:42 PM EST
You can find it here
- (
tuberculosis
)
- (2)
- March 28, 2005, 02:44:08 PM EST
Time line?
- (
jb4
)
- (1)
- March 29, 2005, 07:59:43 PM EST
Released in 1988
- (
tuberculosis
)
- March 29, 2005, 08:07:25 PM EST
Actually, Algol 68 was designed from the ground up
- (
Arkadiy
)
- March 14, 2005, 12:16:18 PM EST
Re: What the heck is text?
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- (3)
- March 14, 2005, 10:51:50 AM EST
I must correct you - ASCII is a 7-bit encoding
- (
tuberculosis
)
- Aug. 21, 2007, 06:30:04 AM EDT
Whoa, there.
- (
ubernostrum
)
- (1)
- March 14, 2005, 01:31:43 PM EST
Your right mostly
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- March 14, 2005, 02:36:05 PM EST
Using a pencil, it's unambiguous.
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (3)
- March 28, 2005, 01:14:03 PM EST
You haven't seen my handwriting....
-NT
- (
Another Scott
)
- (2)
- March 28, 2005, 02:04:44 PM EST
Uh-oh. I wouldn't confess that ;0)
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (1)
- March 28, 2005, 02:56:59 PM EST
My father's handwriting was so bad...
- (
broomberg
)
- March 28, 2005, 09:21:00 PM EST
Now viewing page 37 of 92
[
Prev
]
1
...
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
...
92
[
Next
]
i
we
they
.org
GOPHERS, not GOLFERS!
1,433 ms