IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Now viewing page 34 of 92
[Prev] 1 ... 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 ... 92 [Next]
     Hey Christian! - (imric) - (3)
         Thanks; DL'ed! :-) I'd forgotten to keep up-to-date on that. -NT - (CRConrad) - (2)
             Is it any good? - (imric) - (1)
                 Dunno; haven't tried it yet; I'm at work. Will report back. -NT - (CRConrad)
     Anyone have an opinion? - (imric) - (3)
         Sure. You're ugly. And your mother dresses you funny. - (broomberg)
         I've got previous personal versions of ... - (Another Scott)
         The IDE UI *may* be slow and/or clunky, I don't know. - (CRConrad)
     Testing harness for Rendezvous sought - (Arkadiy) - (5)
         I have a vague memory of some Python stuffs to do with this - (pwhysall) - (4)
             Google-fu Iron Dragon Style! - (pwhysall) - (3)
                 Wrong Rendezvous - (Arkadiy) - (2)
                     Which would be why Apple renamed theirs "Bonjour" -NT - (altmann)
                     I *thought* it was a bit hip for you, Ark - (pwhysall)
     Need a comparison, C#.NET vs Java - (drewk) - (27)
         IBM's JVM has better GC control. - (Another Scott) - (1)
             What about platform independence? - (drewk)
         Warning. C# and .NET are actually quite nice. - (pwhysall) - (1)
             Actually, I think dot net is so '90s - (tonytib)
         Corrections - (ben_tilly)
         Haven't studied memory managmenent, don't want to - (warmachine)
         Key differences: One of them sucks - (tuberculosis) - (17)
             Is "unmanaged" what he means when he says "unsafe function"? - (drewk) - (11)
                 Send him here - (ben_tilly) - (9)
                     Seconded. - (static) - (8)
                         Thirded - (Ashton)
                         Your honeymoon's showing. - (pwhysall) - (6)
                             :-) -NT - (Another Scott)
                             I read a statistic once ... - (drewk)
                             That wasn't a deliberate misunderstanding, was it? - (static) - (3)
                                 </jokeson> -NT - (pwhysall) - (1)
                                     Yes, I know. :-) -NT - (static)
                                 How could it be anything else?!? Paranoia much, eh...? :-) -NT - (CRConrad)
                 Yes - (tuberculosis)
             OT-OK Todd (and any body else who has a good answer)... - (jb4) - (4)
                 Probably not a good answer...but... - (ChrisR) - (3)
                     That's a pretty good answer - (tuberculosis) - (2)
                         Any byte in the machine, or... - (jb4) - (1)
                             As much protection as the Operating System provides... - (ChrisR)
         Re: Need a comparison, C#.NET vs Java - (dshellman)
         As long as you want to manage the low level details.... - (ChrisR) - (1)
             :-) -NT - (Another Scott)
     Stroustrup remains delusional about his evil little creation - (tuberculosis) - (9)
         Re: Stroustrup remains delusional about his evil little crea - (systems) - (8)
             Not really - (warmachine) - (1)
                 Generics are a pain in the rear - (admin)
             Oh, I dislike Stepanov plenty as well - (tuberculosis) - (3)
                 Just so you know - (jake123) - (2)
                     OK - (tuberculosis) - (1)
                         It's good if you ever find yourself working on IBM stuff - (jake123)
             Knowing Todd... - (ChrisR)
             MOP! I.Love.It. -NT - (mmoffitt)
     C# -> Linux Perl RPC? - (broomberg) - (21)
         RPC means...? - (dws) - (15)
             Re: RPC means...? - (Simon_Jester) - (1)
                 When you hear "RPC", it makes sense to ask about context - (dws)
             Low volume - interactive - (broomberg) - (12)
                 SOAP is a dirty word - (admin) - (11)
                     REST in the ease of HTTP - (FuManChu) - (1)
                         Yep, that's what we support here. -NT - (admin)
                     Agreed - (ben_tilly) - (8)
                         Irony can be so ironic... -NT - (admin)
                         Sure it stands for something - (tuberculosis) - (6)
                             Come on, you can do better than that: - (admin) - (5)
                                 I suppose - (tuberculosis) - (2)
                                     ROFL -NT - (FuManChu)
                                     That works -NT - (admin)
                                 Surely Over Agitation Pleases - (pwhysall)
                                 Simple Operations Are Perplexing -NT - (ben_tilly)
         OT: could you get rid of the animation in your icon - (Arkadiy) - (3)
             Use your browser features to disable that. - (Yendor)
             Somewhat changed. -NT - (broomberg) - (1)
                 Oh yeah, that's just lovely (new thread) - (tuberculosis)
         I recently had to do something like that. - (static)
     OK, explain the cycle to the ignorant masses here -NT - (tuberculosis) - (22)
         What, again? - (imric) - (21)
             I'd have to use it to see the point - (ben_tilly) - (18)
                 Unfortunately true for many. - (imric) - (17)
                     I dunno, Skip - (jb4) - (3)
                         You're up on me - (imric)
                         SNOBOL *Two*? - (static) - (1)
                             SNOBOL2 most definitely != SNOBOL4 -NT - (jb4)
                     Can you give a concrete example? - (ben_tilly) - (12)
                         I was thinking of that. - (imric)
                         Think of perl autolooping - (broomberg) - (10)
                             I'm thinking about that and... - (ben_tilly) - (9)
                                 I don't know Perl - (imric) - (8)
                                     Don't even bother - (broomberg) - (7)
                                         Whoa, that takes me back. - (imric) - (6)
                                             But, COBOL programs can be read by management! :) - (a6l6e6x) - (5)
                                                 Cobol DOES give that illusion... -NT - (imric) - (2)
                                                     Oh, sure they can, that's no illusion. - (CRConrad) - (1)
                                                         heheh. -NT - (imric)
                                                 Yeah, the same way I can read Hebrew :) - (Arkadiy) - (1)
                                                     *chuckle* -NT - (imric)
             Ignoring the cycle - (FuManChu) - (1)
                 Because - (imric)
     So what is wrong with your favorite language? - (JayMehaffey) - (22)
         The ones I get to code in? Or the ones I'd actully want to? -NT - (Arkadiy) - (5)
             You pick -NT - (tuberculosis) - (4)
                 Well then, I'd nominate Smalltalk - (Arkadiy) - (3)
                     Side note on Unit Testing - (JimWeirich) - (2)
                         Ditto, but s/Ruby/Python - (admin)
                         I write more in Smalltalk - (tuberculosis)
         I think that context is a horrible idea in Perl - (ben_tilly)
         I suspect many of my opinions are well known - (tuberculosis)
         Way too early for my candidate - (ChrisR)
         Positional, limited variable names and booleans - (imric) - (2)
             Agreed - (SpiceWare)
             OK, explain the cycle to the ignorant masses here (new thread) - (tuberculosis)
         Python... - (admin) - (3)
             Closures are being removed? -NT - (FuManChu) - (2)
                 Lambdas, actually. - (admin) - (1)
                     Yes; that bites. - (FuManChu)
         I can empathise about PHP. - (static)
         Nested hash notation in Perl. - (pwhysall) - (4)
             Naw. - (broomberg) - (3)
                 Ick. -NT - (pwhysall)
                 Compare to Ruby - (ben_tilly) - (1)
                     Which is pretty much the same as Python - (admin)
     Linux: Managing the Kernel Source With 'git' - (bluke) - (1)
         Re: Linux: Managing the Kernel Source With 'git' - (JayMehaffey)
     Shell/awk/grep question - (pwhysall) - (3)
         This should do it - (broomberg)
         export AWKVAR=`awk -F, '{ print $1 }' thing.txt` - (boxley) - (1)
             Will a NL sepeated list work? - (broomberg)
Now viewing page 34 of 92
[Prev] 1 ... 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 ... 92 [Next]

Whenever someone says, "Show, don't tell," aren't they violating that exact rule?
902 ms