That performance should be inversely proportional not to...

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #214,508

by CRConrad

7/12/05 4:12:23 PM

That performance should be inversely proportional not to...

...load, but to the logarithm of load? Seems like the only plausible interpretation, to me.

[link|mailto:MyUserId@MyISP.CountryCode|Christian R. Conrad]
(I live in Finland, and my e-mail in-box is at the Saunalahti company.)

Your lies are of Microsoftian Scale and boring to boot. Your 'depression' may be the closest you ever come to recognizing truth: you have no 'inferiority complex', you are inferior - and something inside you recognizes this. - [link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=71575|Ashton Brown]

Odd word usage - (broomberg) - (9) - July 12, 2005, 04:02:16 PM EDT

Wants the rate to be slower at first - (hnick) - July 12, 2005, 04:08:53 PM EDT

That performance should be inversely proportional not to... - (CRConrad) - July 12, 2005, 04:12:23 PM EDT

Huh? - (broomberg) - (2) - July 12, 2005, 04:18:41 PM EDT

Ok, given that - (hnick) - (1) - July 12, 2005, 04:31:35 PM EDT

ICLRPD (new thread) - (jb4) - July 14, 2005, 09:41:37 AM EDT

If he was slightly technical I'd say... - (ben_tilly) - (1) - July 12, 2005, 05:18:49 PM EDT

Got it. - (broomberg) - July 12, 2005, 06:31:31 PM EDT

You'd be fools not to consider ... - (altmann) - July 13, 2005, 12:51:19 AM EDT

Linear degradation is usually an improvement - (tuberculosis) - July 13, 2005, 12:18:00 PM EDT

iwethey.org

Here we have a game that combines the charm of a Pentagon briefing with the excitement of double-entry bookkeeping. I don't get it.
47 ms