But you didn't, that's the problem.
The "pattern" that you saw wasn't the right one, in other words.
The pattern of argument you have used in this thread is of the "my country, right or wrong" type.
Not even close.
So either I'm doing a piss-poor job of elaborating, or you're not reading.
I *thought* I was being very clear, that I was talking about the *problems* with lionizing vandals. That the people mentioned in the first story - the ones who are breaking the law, and destroying public safety equipment to avoid fines for breaking the law - were as serious a problem as overreaching police.
Its entirely possible that I failed utterly with that.
But its not possible that when you compared me to the Nazi thugs (who broke the law), instead of explaining what gave you that impression (which would then be discussable), just insulting me, and I explained why that was wrong, that that then "reinforces" what you thought. Well, let me take that back. Its *possible*, but its even more illogical.
That is a characteristic of fascist thinking.
But it 'tain't what I'ma doing.
Its typical of fascist thinking to tar your opponent with lies and analogies, lacking any factual basis... Like, um "Your brown shirts are ready?"
You say it's an incorrect analogy.
You are wrong.
*Sigh* Only, apparently, because I have a better (or any) understanding of history.
You attacked.
Hmmm. A valid response. Just not too "thoughtful"
And explained (and it still stands, unrefuted) *WHY* (it was wrong). Very thoughtful. Best I could do, given the mere insult that was typical of who you were trying to categorize me with. Ironic, don'tcha think?
Or are you trying to tell me that the "Your brown shirts are ready" was a thought out, explained comment?
Addison
