Configurability, in and of itself, is not an evil, should not be unilaterally abolished, does not cause applications to lose their focus, does not cause global warming, and did not shoot JFK. And I don't care who or what they are, I will flame the everliving hell out of the next person who claims I said it does.Emphasis mine. Now, since this is a direct response to a post of mine, I assumed that you were speaking directly to me.
And this is what I call a "conversational slide". Ignore most of the points in a post, nitpick a few things, and then make a claim (as above) which is then used to slide the conversation away. You've been pounding your shoe on the table and yelling about how everyone says you want to abolish configurability, while conveniently using it as a club to avoid talking about the precise points being made. Granted, you've answered some things, but only when dragged back around. Usually when confronted with [link|/forums/render/user?username=tablizer|this sort of troll], I use a [link|/forums/render/content/show?contentid=156381|single point, single post] technique. But you're a fairly boring troll, so I'm not interested in whatever meager entertainment you might provide.
IHBT. HAND.