My turn: I refuse to respond to you further until such time as you read, collate and reply to each and every point I have made in each and every post in this thread. Your replies must make use of blockquote tags to identify material you are quoting from another post, must provide a hyperlink to the post from which the quotation is taken and must not at any time use quotation marks in any fashion, in order to avoid the impression that material contained within them is a quotation from another user.
\r\n\r\n
Reading the most recent batch of replies from several people, it appears that these are just some of the rules by which all members of the ZIWT forums are expected to abide, and until such time as I see them observed I will not respond to any points you attempt to make.
\r\n\r\n
Because, you know, fair's fair, right?
\r\n\r\n
Seriously, though? While I don't think I ever said that you personally made such a statement, and I defy you to find where I claimed that you personally made such a statement, it was the conclusion toward which many replies from multiple people seemed to be tending, or the conclusion toward which they apparently hoped to lead me. As it is not a conclusion I agree with, and as it is a common strawman used by certain types of people when arguing against anything which involves the word 'usability', I have gone to extreme lengths to distance myself from it and from anything which gives even the appearance of attempting to lead me toward it.