How many pairs of shoes are we talking about.

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #135,906

by bepatient

1/15/04 2:00:05 PM

How many pairs of shoes are we talking about.

1 million - 60k...not likely

10 million - 600k...you'll raise an eyebrow

50 million? - 3 million ... you'll be making powerpoints to the brass.

If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. _{Fudd's First Law of Opposition}

It goes in, it must come out._{Teslacle's Deviant to Fudd's Law}

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]

"as American as Levis" - (deSitter) - (79) - Jan. 9, 2004, 05:15:56 AM EST

Uhhh...Ross? - (jb4) - (14) - Jan. 9, 2004, 10:01:39 AM EST

ferget it, he's on a roll -NT - (boxley) - (2) - Jan. 9, 2004, 10:21:25 AM EST

Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?? -NT - (admin) - (1) - Jan. 9, 2004, 10:23:55 AM EST

Hell No!!! And it ain't over now. -NT - (xtensive) - Jan. 9, 2004, 12:43:06 PM EST

Re: Uhhh...Ross? - (deSitter) - (10) - Jan. 9, 2004, 01:08:08 PM EST

It shows your hatred of women - (orion) - (7) - Jan. 9, 2004, 01:33:16 PM EST

Re: It shows your hatred of women - (deSitter) - (6) - Jan. 9, 2004, 01:39:20 PM EST

Not every woman is like that - (orion) - (5) - Jan. 9, 2004, 02:34:37 PM EST

Re: Not every woman is like that - (deSitter) - (4) - Jan. 9, 2004, 03:07:26 PM EST

"Shut up and go away, I'm stereotyping." :) -NT - (inthane-chan) - Jan. 9, 2004, 03:12:24 PM EST

I did read - (orion) - (2) - Jan. 9, 2004, 03:28:59 PM EST

shakes head and resolves to ignore drones -NT - (deSitter) - (1) - Jan. 9, 2004, 03:37:11 PM EST

Yaaaay! -NT - (Arkadiy) - Jan. 9, 2004, 03:49:26 PM EST

Wow - (Nightowl) - Jan. 9, 2004, 06:50:34 PM EST

Words fail... - (jb4) - Jan. 12, 2004, 02:20:59 PM EST

Re: "We can't even make our own damn pants" - (lincoln) - (13) - Jan. 12, 2004, 10:34:44 PM EST

My last job was at a major shoe manufacturer... - (danreck) - (12) - Jan. 15, 2004, 11:02:42 AM EST

Any thoughts on where the money goes? - (Another Scott) - (2) - Jan. 15, 2004, 11:11:04 AM EST

Re: Any thoughts on where the money goes? - (danreck) - (1) - Jan. 15, 2004, 11:50:14 AM EST

Ah, US Shoe.... -NT - (Another Scott) - Jan. 15, 2004, 12:54:44 PM EST

Oooohh...A whole $.06 savings! - (jb4) - Jan. 15, 2004, 11:47:06 AM EST

Now, this is odd - (Arkadiy) - (6) - Jan. 15, 2004, 11:53:37 AM EST

It's called 'Executive Compensation' -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - (3) - Jan. 15, 2004, 12:06:26 PM EST

Yeah, but what executive cares to increase his compensation - (Arkadiy) - (2) - Jan. 15, 2004, 01:54:42 PM EST

That risk is to the stockholders . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - Jan. 15, 2004, 01:58:19 PM EST

Well, I guess - (Arkadiy) - Jan. 15, 2004, 02:08:51 PM EST

How many pairs of shoes are we talking about. - (bepatient) - Jan. 15, 2004, 02:00:05 PM EST

Who has that profit, matters - (ben_tilly) - Jan. 15, 2004, 02:12:48 PM EST

Right - (deSitter) - Jan. 15, 2004, 05:46:23 PM EST

What do you know about feminism? - (slugbug) - (49) - Jan. 12, 2004, 11:42:31 PM EST

It's all of a part - (deSitter) - (48) - Jan. 13, 2004, 03:38:08 AM EST

Reading a little extra into that, aren't you? - (ben_tilly) - (46) - Jan. 13, 2004, 10:55:22 AM EST

Re: Reading a little extra into that, aren't you? - (deSitter) - (45) - Jan. 14, 2004, 03:12:51 AM EST

Cart before horse - (Ashton) - (1) - Jan. 14, 2004, 07:37:32 AM EST

keep john wayne out of it - (boxley) - Jan. 14, 2004, 09:31:26 AM EST

Re: Reading a little extra into that, aren't you? - (deSitter) - (1) - Jan. 14, 2004, 08:33:26 AM EST

Shirley... - (CRConrad) - Jan. 14, 2004, 08:38:27 AM EST

Again, you're ascribing the wrong cause - (ben_tilly) - (40) - Jan. 14, 2004, 04:41:52 PM EST

Additional causes plus a small edit. - (inthane-chan) - (39) - Jan. 14, 2004, 03:56:45 PM EST

Puritanism is ignorant of, simultaneously opposed-to an idea - (Ashton) - (38) - Jan. 14, 2004, 05:27:12 PM EST

IMO, Ashton... - (inthane-chan) - (1) - Jan. 14, 2004, 05:47:42 PM EST

ICLRPD (new thread) - (jb4) - Jan. 14, 2004, 05:49:16 PM EST

Re: Puritanism is ignorant of, simultaneously opposed-to an - (deSitter) - (34) - Jan. 14, 2004, 06:10:36 PM EST

Sorry, can't ignore this one. - (Nightowl) - (29) - Jan. 14, 2004, 06:16:57 PM EST

Re: Sorry, can't ignore this one. - (deSitter) - (3) - Jan. 14, 2004, 06:25:12 PM EST

Whatever - (Nightowl) - Jan. 14, 2004, 06:28:23 PM EST

Fundamental Units (new thread) - (deSitter) - Jan. 15, 2004, 01:00:03 AM EST

Ross, the Puritan........I never would have thought it! - (jb4) - Jan. 15, 2004, 09:30:19 AM EST

So you are in favor of gay marriages? - (a6l6e6x) - (9) - Jan. 14, 2004, 07:57:35 PM EST

I never said that - (Nightowl) - (8) - Jan. 14, 2004, 08:06:35 PM EST

You never said anything against it either - (ben_tilly) - (7) - Jan. 14, 2004, 08:48:56 PM EST

Stop putting words in my mouth - (Nightowl) - (6) - Jan. 14, 2004, 08:28:05 PM EST

Hint - Nobody said you did. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Jan. 14, 2004, 08:50:17 PM EST

Re: Hint - Nobody said you did. - (Nightowl) - Jan. 14, 2004, 08:57:46 PM EST

But I didn't - reading comprehension time - (ben_tilly) - (3) - Jan. 14, 2004, 08:57:04 PM EST

Re: But I didn't - reading comprehension time - (Nightowl) - (1) - Jan. 14, 2004, 09:00:50 PM EST

Yes, but.... - (ben_tilly) - Jan. 15, 2004, 10:26:07 AM EST

Bingo! -NT - (a6l6e6x) - Jan. 14, 2004, 09:27:33 PM EST

childless and married are we? - (boxley) - (14) - Jan. 14, 2004, 09:38:06 PM EST

You are incorrect. - (Nightowl) - (13) - Jan. 14, 2004, 09:49:16 PM EST

No need to be sorry. Your life, your choice. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - (1) - Jan. 14, 2004, 09:53:19 PM EST

Re: No need to be sorry. Your life, your choice. - (Nightowl) - Jan. 14, 2004, 09:56:00 PM EST

Depending on which Christian Sect you belong to - (boxley) - (10) - Jan. 14, 2004, 10:00:23 PM EST

Re: Depending on which Christian Sect you belong to - (Nightowl) - (3) - Jan. 14, 2004, 10:12:21 PM EST

No need to debate your religion at all - (boxley) - (2) - Jan. 14, 2004, 10:17:48 PM EST

That isn't quite what I said - (Nightowl) - Jan. 14, 2004, 10:22:50 PM EST

So infertile people shouldn't be able to marry? (new thread) - (Another Scott) - Jan. 14, 2004, 10:49:39 PM EST

On Catholic birth control - (Silverlock) - (1) - Jan. 15, 2004, 08:58:10 AM EST

Re: On Catholic birth control - (hnick) - Jan. 15, 2004, 09:40:22 AM EST

State marriages are more than a tax sham - (ben_tilly) - (3) - Jan. 15, 2004, 10:18:28 AM EST

marriage matters to whom? - (boxley) - (2) - Jan. 15, 2004, 06:37:44 PM EST

Immediate respect - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Jan. 15, 2004, 09:30:47 PM EST

wondered if that was it - (boxley) - Jan. 15, 2004, 09:44:25 PM EST

deS gets better and better - (Arkadiy) - (3) - Jan. 15, 2004, 10:53:39 AM EST

Re: deS gets better and better - (deSitter) - (2) - Jan. 15, 2004, 05:50:49 PM EST

Where you advocated infidelity is... - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Jan. 15, 2004, 09:33:52 PM EST

Re: Where you advocated infidelity is... - (deSitter) - Jan. 16, 2004, 08:49:38 AM EST

yer last sentence is incorrect - (boxley) - Jan. 14, 2004, 09:33:41 PM EST

But I argue that the workforce needed to be doubled - (orion) - Jan. 13, 2004, 12:04:17 PM EST

iwethey.org

At least their extensions make something resembling sense.
105 ms