ObLRPD: Eat your failures.

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #125,574 by hnick 11/13/03 8:23:20 PM Reply	ObLRPD: Eat your failures.
Post #125,577 by Nightowl 11/13/03 8:41:13 PM Reply	Re: ObLRPD: Eat your failures. Ahhh. I've been meaning to ask someone, but what is an ObLRPD? I know what the ICLRPD's are... and what do you mean by "Eat your failures?" Thanks. Nightowl >8# P.S. I still haven't EVER had anyone pick something from what I posted as an LRPD, so I'm still awaiting that revered moment someday. ;) "I learned to be the door, instead of the mat!" "illegitimi nil carborundum" Comment by Nightowl
Post #125,579 by ChrisR 11/13/03 8:45:51 PM Reply	Obligatory LRPD

(Does) IT Eat Its Own? - (Ashton) - (103) - Nov. 11, 2003, 07:41:58 AM EST

Re: (Does) IT Eat Its Own? - (deSitter) - (2) - Nov. 11, 2003, 08:07:29 AM EST

Correction. - (Ashton) - (1) - Nov. 11, 2003, 08:23:13 AM EST

Re: Correction. - (deSitter) - Nov. 11, 2003, 09:16:24 AM EST

Seconded - (jbrabeck) - Nov. 11, 2003, 08:10:44 AM EST

Aye. - (imric) - (2) - Nov. 11, 2003, 08:53:16 AM EST

Plea to all of Karsten's friends/followers - (jbrabeck) - (1) - Nov. 11, 2003, 08:57:00 AM EST

Sent... - (imric) - Nov. 11, 2003, 09:26:16 AM EST

Re: (Does) IT Eat Its Own? - (Nightowl) - Nov. 11, 2003, 11:58:18 AM EST

My two cents ( was Re: (Does) IT Eat Its Own?) - (Nightowl) - (87) - Nov. 11, 2003, 11:57:38 AM EST

Banned? - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - Nov. 11, 2003, 12:01:39 PM EST

Happens a lot in the Yahoo Groups - (orion) - Nov. 11, 2003, 12:18:24 PM EST

Re: Banned? - (Nightowl) - Nov. 11, 2003, 12:45:06 PM EST

More two cents - (orion) - Nov. 11, 2003, 12:13:50 PM EST

Correction: Nobody was banned - (rickmoen) - (82) - Nov. 11, 2003, 05:49:22 PM EST

Karsten's reasons are in 125001 - (Another Scott) - Nov. 11, 2003, 05:58:56 PM EST

Uh Rick? - (tuberculosis) - (1) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:38:57 AM EDT

Yeah, you're right - (rickmoen) - Nov. 11, 2003, 09:14:00 PM EST

Riiighhht - (bepatient) - (2) - Nov. 11, 2003, 08:02:44 PM EST

Ah, here we have Mister Constructive! - (rickmoen) - (1) - Nov. 11, 2003, 09:21:26 PM EST

Of course you aren't. - (bepatient) - Nov. 11, 2003, 09:28:12 PM EST

Re: Correction: Nobody was banned - (Nightowl) - (74) - Nov. 11, 2003, 09:57:53 PM EST

Re: Correction: Nobody was banned - (rickmoen) - (73) - Nov. 12, 2003, 12:13:37 AM EST

Re: Correction: Nobody was banned - (Nightowl) - (1) - Nov. 12, 2003, 12:34:10 AM EST

Re: Correction: Nobody was banned - (bepatient) - Nov. 12, 2003, 12:37:41 AM EST

Unfortunately. - (bepatient) - (70) - Nov. 12, 2003, 12:36:04 AM EST

Finally read it all ( was Re: Unfortunately.) - (Nightowl) - (67) - Nov. 12, 2003, 02:02:16 AM EST

Sadly, you've been mislead about what the issue was - (rickmoen) - (65) - Nov. 12, 2003, 03:21:25 AM EST

Rofl - (bepatient) - (2) - Nov. 12, 2003, 07:58:17 AM EST

Well, the mob mascot speaks! - (rickmoen) - (1) - Nov. 12, 2003, 06:45:43 PM EST

Nope, not at all. - (bepatient) - Nov. 12, 2003, 07:41:32 PM EST

Re: Sadly, you've been mislead about what the issue was - (Nightowl) - (61) - Nov. 12, 2003, 10:59:24 AM EST

Darn it. - (bepatient) - Nov. 12, 2003, 10:58:23 AM EST

Time for a new name: Raptor -NT - (drewk) - (10) - Nov. 12, 2003, 11:06:30 AM EST

Re: Time for a new name: Raptor - (Nightowl) - (9) - Nov. 12, 2003, 11:09:47 AM EST

Compliment, definitely -NT - (drewk) - (1) - Nov. 12, 2003, 11:19:22 AM EST

Re: Compliment, definitely - (Nightowl) - Nov. 12, 2003, 11:20:21 AM EST

Raptor means... - (pwhysall) - (6) - Nov. 12, 2003, 11:22:37 AM EST

Re: Raptor means... - (Nightowl) - (5) - Nov. 12, 2003, 11:25:00 AM EST

Well, yes. - (pwhysall) - (4) - Nov. 12, 2003, 11:27:46 AM EST

Re: Well, yes. - (Nightowl) - (3) - Nov. 12, 2003, 11:33:36 AM EST

This hasn't been ... - (drewk) - (2) - Nov. 12, 2003, 11:39:38 AM EST

+5 Inciteful -NT - (bepatient) - Nov. 12, 2003, 11:40:52 AM EST

Re: This hasn't been ... - (Nightowl) - Nov. 12, 2003, 11:41:27 AM EST

Nightey's FIRIN'! - (jb4) - (2) - Nov. 12, 2003, 01:46:42 PM EST

Wow.... I'm surprised ( was Re: Nightey's FIRIN'!) - (Nightowl) - (1) - Nov. 12, 2003, 05:48:23 PM EST

of risks and risks - (cforde) - Nov. 13, 2003, 01:19:52 AM EST

You can admin my board anytime. :) -NT - (FuManChu) - Nov. 12, 2003, 03:31:05 PM EST

Okay... this is getting frightening.... - (folkert) - Nov. 12, 2003, 03:49:01 PM EST

We need more of this (new thread) - (drewk) - Nov. 12, 2003, 03:54:11 PM EST

Re: Sadly, you've been mislead about what the issue was - (rickmoen) - (42) - Nov. 12, 2003, 05:52:49 PM EST

Re: Sadly, you've been mislead about what the issue was - (deSitter) - Nov. 12, 2003, 06:10:18 PM EST

You can leave me out of this...you're dealing with the Owl. -NT - (bepatient) - (1) - Nov. 12, 2003, 06:23:03 PM EST

Fear the ^(O,O)wl -NT - (deSitter) - Nov. 12, 2003, 06:48:52 PM EST

Re: Sadly, you've been mislead about what the issue was - (Nightowl) - (37) - Nov. 12, 2003, 06:34:17 PM EST

Re: Sadly, you've been mislead about what the issue was - (rickmoen) - (12) - Nov. 12, 2003, 07:45:22 PM EST

Re: Sadly, you've been mislead about what the issue was - (Nightowl) - (2) - Nov. 12, 2003, 10:24:52 PM EST

Here you go, Rick! - (Nightowl) - Nov. 13, 2003, 12:11:41 PM EST

Heads Up, Raptorous One (new thread) - (Ashton) - Nov. 14, 2003, 06:46:14 PM EST

Small point - (drewk) - Nov. 13, 2003, 09:27:29 AM EST

Here's another one for you, Rick! - (Nightowl) - (7) - Nov. 13, 2003, 04:40:44 PM EST

Personally, I wish - (ChrisR) - (6) - Nov. 13, 2003, 05:02:16 PM EST

Re: Personally, I wish - (Nightowl) - Nov. 13, 2003, 05:04:40 PM EST

That has alwas been the consensus - (bepatient) - (4) - Nov. 13, 2003, 06:59:56 PM EST

This... - (folkert) - (3) - Nov. 13, 2003, 10:17:04 PM EST

One or 2 things come to mind. Smartypants. -NT - (bepatient) - Nov. 13, 2003, 10:42:10 PM EST

Any way to set up a web page... - (ChrisR) - (1) - Nov. 13, 2003, 11:33:55 PM EST

Maybe... - (folkert) - Nov. 13, 2003, 11:51:39 PM EST

It get better and better - (broomberg) - (21) - Nov. 12, 2003, 07:48:03 PM EST

Re: It get better and better - (Nightowl) - (20) - Nov. 12, 2003, 10:56:59 PM EST

You go girl! - (static) - (19) - Nov. 12, 2003, 11:50:25 PM EST

Re: You go girl! - (Nightowl) - (16) - Nov. 12, 2003, 11:53:56 PM EST

Mailing list. - (static) - (1) - Nov. 12, 2003, 11:59:29 PM EST

Re: Mailing list. - (Nightowl) - Nov. 13, 2003, 12:00:42 AM EST

The dates you're looking for... - (Yendor) - (13) - Nov. 13, 2003, 01:36:19 AM EST

Re: The dates you're looking for... - (Nightowl) - (11) - Nov. 13, 2003, 02:06:00 AM EST

I've GOT THEM! ( was Re: The dates you're looking for...) - (Nightowl) - (10) - Nov. 13, 2003, 10:14:02 AM EST

I admire your tenacity. - (static) - (9) - Nov. 13, 2003, 07:05:17 PM EST

Re: I admire your tenacity. - (Nightowl) - (8) - Nov. 13, 2003, 07:39:47 PM EST

Your research abilities are to be admired. - (hnick) - (7) - Nov. 13, 2003, 08:22:28 PM EST

ObLRPD: Eat your failures. -NT - (hnick) - (2) - Nov. 13, 2003, 08:23:20 PM EST

Re: ObLRPD: Eat your failures. - (Nightowl) - (1) - Nov. 13, 2003, 08:41:13 PM EST

Obligatory LRPD -NT - (ChrisR) - Nov. 13, 2003, 08:45:51 PM EST

Re: Your research abilities are to be admired. - (Nightowl) - (3) - Nov. 13, 2003, 08:39:33 PM EST

The official policy... - (ChrisR) - (2) - Nov. 13, 2003, 08:44:59 PM EST

ObLRPD: But don't get all fretty-pants on us. -NT - (Another Scott) - (1) - Nov. 13, 2003, 09:05:51 PM EST

ObLRPD: Loose the Hounds! -NT - (folkert) - Nov. 13, 2003, 10:08:30 PM EST

That reminds me, Rick... - (Nightowl) - Nov. 13, 2003, 02:04:28 AM EST

I think I found it, Wade. ( was Re: You go girl!) - (Nightowl) - (1) - Nov. 13, 2003, 12:57:10 AM EST

That's how it began, yes. - (static) - Nov. 13, 2003, 07:03:46 PM EST

Damn....You're good! - (jb4) - (1) - Nov. 13, 2003, 01:51:53 PM EST

Re: Damn....You're good! - (Nightowl) - Nov. 13, 2003, 03:51:21 PM EST

Rick's Patented Strawman Attack(tm) -NT - (folkert) - Nov. 12, 2003, 06:30:53 PM EST

Hey, Nightey.....GREAT Post! - (jb4) - Nov. 12, 2003, 01:40:44 PM EST

Not so fast, buddy - (rickmoen) - (1) - Nov. 12, 2003, 02:41:55 AM EST

That says it all, really. - (FuManChu) - Nov. 12, 2003, 03:17:26 AM EST

thanx for adding monkeys, goats and footballs to the mix - (boxley) - Nov. 11, 2003, 10:14:38 PM EST

Whole thing was stupid - (tuberculosis) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:38:00 AM EDT

Well said, Ashton! - (a6l6e6x) - Nov. 11, 2003, 07:11:01 PM EST

I didn't get a vote, either. - (static) - Nov. 12, 2003, 06:05:03 AM EST

After some reflection on the question - (hnick) - (3) - Nov. 12, 2003, 08:14:26 AM EST

100% Correct. -NT - (pwhysall) - Nov. 12, 2003, 08:25:54 AM EST

...and too stubborn to Let. It. Go. -NT - (Steve Lowe) - Nov. 12, 2003, 08:39:29 AM EST

Awomen. -NT - (Ashton) - Nov. 12, 2003, 02:30:48 PM EST

iwethey.org

Remember, people in 1900 didn't know what an atom was. They didn't know its structure.

They also didn't know what a radio was, or an airport, or a movie, or a television, or a computer, or a cell phone, or a jet, an antibiotic, a rocket, a satellite, an MRI, ICU, IUD, IBM, IRA, ERA, EEG, EPA, IRS, DOD, PCP, HTML, internet. interferon, instant replay, remote sensing, remote control, speed dialing, gene therapy, gene splicing, genes, spot welding, heat-seeking, bipolar, prozac, leotards, lap dancing, email, tape recorder, CDs, airbags, plastic explosive, plastic, robots, cars, liposuction, transduction, superconduction, dish antennas, step aerobics, smoothies, twelve-step, ultrasound, nylon, rayon, teflon, fiber optics, carpal tunnel, laser surgery, laparoscopy, corneal transplant, kidney transplant, AIDS... None of this would have meant anything to a person in the year 1900. They wouldn't know what you are talking about.
107 ms