Since 1939 the Miller case has been cited to support negative decisions in every federal circuit but the Fifth in Emerson. The Silveira cert petition exposes the poor reasoning of Miller thoroughly and asks that those parts of it that are historically and constitutionally wrong be overruled.


Poorly reasoned? Would that be because the Justices can read? Think it's a coincidence the NRA quotes the amendment "...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."? It's those little ...'s that give the NRA so much trouble. It's called context. Now, which argument is it again that is "poorly reasoned"?