http://www.wctrib.co...en-intel-evidence
Here's a bit:
As Reuters reported Monday, the Special Operations Division of the DEA funnels information from overseas NSA intercepts, domestic wiretaps , informants and a large DEA database of telephone records to authorities nationwide to help them launch criminal investigations of Americans. The DEA phone database is distinct from a NSA database disclosed by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden. - See more at: http://www.wctrib.co...ash.fZEcMgSr.dpuf
Or this:
http://mobile.reuter...20130805?irpc=932
Here's abit:
...."Remember that the utilization of SOD cannot be revealed or discussed in any investigative function," a document presented to agents reads. The document specifically directs agents to omit the SOD's involvement from investigative reports, affidavits, discussions with prosecutors and courtroom testimony. Agents are instructed to then use "normal investigative techniques to recreate the information provided by SOD."
....A former federal agent in the northeastern United States who received such tips from SOD described the process. "You'd be told only, ÂBe at a certain truck stop at a certain time and look for a certain vehicle.' And so we'd alert the state police to find an excuse to stop that vehicle, and then have a drug dog search it," the agent said.
Catch that? They MAKE SHIT UP to hide the source if the info. It is STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE, well documented.
And this is not "Stan" of American Dad (what shitty character to use in an argument. I used to think so much more highly of you).
This is ROWS and ROWS of people who's ONLY job is to "analyze" tidbits of email and texts and then forward them along, either flagging a national security interest issue or (primarily) a drug issue (to the DEA). That's it, they do nothing else.
It's already there, it's a done deal, been up and running for a few years. Ever since carnivore (TIS), they just renamed it. They didn't even need google or MS help, it just makes it easier for them.
And don't bother saying: Jeez, if you feel so strongly about this, what are YOU doing! You are misdirecting. We have a specific discussion. Some of us "believe" (or know) something, others say either IT ISN'T TRUE or IT ISN'T SO BAD, TOUGH SHIT LIVE WITH IT.
So I'm trying to figure out which of those answers are you.
Which one?