IWETHEY v. 0.3.0
|
TODO
1,095 registered users | 0
active users
| 0 LpH |
Statistics
Login
|
Create New User
Welcome to IWETHEY!
IWETHEY Home
/
IWETHEY Board
/
Patent Wars and Antitrust Forum
/
Well...
Post #7,676
by
bepatient
9/4/01 7:59:40 PM
Reply
Well...
...we could sub Reno for Balmer....
shudder...after seeing the monkey boy routine...he might like it too much too.
Ew...yuck
You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday!
Laurie Anderson
[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
Bill Gates's way, or no way
- (
addison
)
- (105)
- Aug. 29, 2001, 12:33:21 PM EDT
A lesson -
- (
imric
)
- (104)
- Aug. 29, 2001, 05:52:42 PM EDT
At last I see, the only viable solution next:
- (
Ashton
)
- Aug. 29, 2001, 09:25:47 PM EDT
Wrong lesson.
- (
addison
)
- (102)
- Aug. 29, 2001, 09:36:45 PM EDT
This faith may not be entirely misplaced but..
- (
Ashton
)
- Aug. 29, 2001, 11:08:56 PM EDT
And the Thousand Year Reich would have corrected itself . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (7)
- Aug. 30, 2001, 02:16:16 AM EDT
Touch\ufffd____cackle___cackle_____Market Forces for Dummies\ufffd
- (
Ashton
)
- Aug. 30, 2001, 06:03:23 AM EDT
Markets, Andrew, not Governments.
- (
addison
)
- (5)
- Aug. 30, 2001, 09:38:10 AM EDT
False Godwin.
- (
inthane-chan
)
- (1)
- Aug. 30, 2001, 10:39:19 AM EDT
False False godwin.
- (
addison
)
- Aug. 30, 2001, 11:19:19 AM EDT
I fail to see the difference.
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (2)
- Aug. 30, 2001, 11:32:44 AM EDT
The one sentence version
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- Aug. 30, 2001, 11:57:39 AM EDT
I agree, its a failing. :)
- (
addison
)
- Aug. 30, 2001, 01:28:37 PM EDT
I disagree.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (15)
- Aug. 30, 2001, 10:04:50 AM EDT
Re: I disagree.
- (
addison
)
- (14)
- Aug. 30, 2001, 11:38:00 AM EDT
The infrastructure would still be there . . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (4)
- Aug. 30, 2001, 12:02:42 PM EDT
That's a "presume" not a "simply".
- (
addison
)
- (3)
- Aug. 30, 2001, 01:31:49 PM EDT
What's Microsoft's ratio of "plants, trucks, etc"...
- (
CRConrad
)
- (1)
- Aug. 30, 2001, 01:55:20 PM EDT
Erm. I think you got mixed up.
- (
addison
)
- Aug. 30, 2001, 02:16:00 PM EDT
Counterexample.
- (
a6l6e6x
)
- Aug. 30, 2001, 05:02:12 PM EDT
SOAP
- (
Decco Dave
)
- (8)
- Sept. 1, 2001, 11:28:08 AM EDT
Needs more washing
- (
addison
)
- (3)
- Sept. 1, 2001, 11:56:40 AM EDT
Re: Needs more washing
- (
Decco Dave
)
- (2)
- Sept. 3, 2001, 11:16:10 PM EDT
Needs a LOT more washing.
- (
addison
)
- (1)
- Sept. 4, 2001, 12:53:45 AM EDT
Interoperation?
- (
Decco Dave
)
- Sept. 4, 2001, 12:28:29 PM EDT
Re: SOAP - MS 'invented' SOAP ?
- (
dmarker2
)
- (1)
- Sept. 1, 2001, 12:06:52 PM EDT
Pleasing MS
- (
Decco Dave
)
- Sept. 3, 2001, 11:29:09 PM EDT
Microsoft did not invent SOAP.
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (1)
- Sept. 1, 2001, 01:00:45 PM EDT
Dave Winer.
- (
static
)
- Sept. 3, 2001, 12:27:38 AM EDT
Antitrust law IS a 'market correction'
-NT
- (
imric
)
- (76)
- Aug. 30, 2001, 05:29:26 PM EDT
No, its an artificial outside influence, like ceiling/floors
-NT
- (
addison
)
- (43)
- Aug. 30, 2001, 08:51:54 PM EDT
Wrong.
- (
imric
)
- (42)
- Aug. 30, 2001, 10:34:33 PM EDT
If you insist on perverting the language, fine.
- (
addison
)
- (41)
- Aug. 31, 2001, 12:24:14 AM EDT
noting previous antitrust vs. Microsoft
- (
wharris2
)
- (1)
- Aug. 31, 2001, 04:46:23 AM EDT
Absolute faith in a simplistic concept, 'free market'
- (
Ashton
)
- Aug. 31, 2001, 06:18:55 AM EDT
So hostile...
- (
imric
)
- (38)
- Aug. 31, 2001, 09:58:40 AM EDT
Because its a "concept" that disallows agreement.
- (
addison
)
- (37)
- Aug. 31, 2001, 10:24:01 AM EDT
Now we know
- (
Silverlock
)
- (4)
- Aug. 31, 2001, 11:19:48 AM EDT
Re: Now we know
- (
addison
)
- (3)
- Aug. 31, 2001, 01:15:35 PM EDT
Just going by history
- (
Silverlock
)
- (2)
- Aug. 31, 2001, 01:58:22 PM EDT
I suggest you repeat History, you've forgotten it.
- (
addison
)
- (1)
- Aug. 31, 2001, 02:08:36 PM EDT
Sorry dude, you just rub me the wrong way
- (
Silverlock
)
- Aug. 31, 2001, 02:29:17 PM EDT
Sure. Whatever.
- (
imric
)
- (3)
- Aug. 31, 2001, 11:32:36 AM EDT
Re: Sure. Whatever.
- (
addison
)
- (2)
- Aug. 31, 2001, 01:12:21 PM EDT
?
- (
imric
)
- (1)
- Aug. 31, 2001, 03:09:58 PM EDT
You've gotten confused.
- (
addison
)
- Aug. 31, 2001, 04:19:13 PM EDT
Shoplifting is a market force . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (2)
- Aug. 31, 2001, 12:02:23 PM EDT
WOT
- (
jbrabeck
)
- Aug. 31, 2001, 01:08:52 PM EDT
Not really.
- (
addison
)
- Aug. 31, 2001, 01:24:39 PM EDT
Huh???
- (
CRConrad
)
- (4)
- Aug. 31, 2001, 07:12:14 PM EDT
Context, CRC, context.
- (
addison
)
- (3)
- Aug. 31, 2001, 09:43:06 PM EDT
What, you think BeeP is the only economist in here???
- (
CRConrad
)
- (2)
- Sept. 2, 2001, 07:09:18 PM EDT
No idea how many there are in here.
- (
addison
)
- Sept. 2, 2001, 10:45:15 PM EDT
Econometrics...cool
- (
bepatient
)
- Sept. 2, 2001, 11:34:12 PM EDT
Good point...
- (
hnick
)
- (17)
- Sept. 1, 2001, 10:54:07 AM EDT
Two approaches to "the market"
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (16)
- Sept. 1, 2001, 12:37:56 PM EDT
Re: Two approaches to "the market"
- (
addison
)
- (11)
- Sept. 1, 2001, 01:14:28 PM EDT
BTW:
- (
addison
)
- (10)
- Sept. 1, 2001, 01:15:40 PM EDT
Which is why you adhere . . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (9)
- Sept. 1, 2001, 01:55:31 PM EDT
Which is why I asked...
- (
addison
)
- (8)
- Sept. 1, 2001, 02:56:56 PM EDT
How "Super Buys" work . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (7)
- Sept. 1, 2001, 04:25:28 PM EDT
Hey! I think I see a 'graph' in there________:-\ufffd
- (
Ashton
)
- (1)
- Sept. 1, 2001, 05:12:49 PM EDT
Adventures in marketing #48734655j
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- Sept. 1, 2001, 05:56:44 PM EDT
Or, for the 'engineering model'
- (
Ashton
)
- (1)
- Sept. 1, 2001, 05:38:24 PM EDT
No problem - it's "Faith Based"
-NT
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- Sept. 1, 2001, 06:52:49 PM EDT
Missed item
- (
wharris2
)
- (2)
- Sept. 3, 2001, 07:11:36 PM EDT
dollar stores also
- (
boxley
)
- Sept. 3, 2001, 09:23:43 PM EDT
No, I got that . . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- Sept. 3, 2001, 09:41:16 PM EDT
Boys boys boys....
- (
bepatient
)
- (3)
- Sept. 2, 2001, 01:24:22 PM EDT
Now don't spoil it, BP
- (
Ashton
)
- Sept. 2, 2001, 04:30:42 PM EDT
How much is this a semantic argument?
- (
drewk
)
- (1)
- Sept. 4, 2001, 04:35:31 PM EDT
Definition...
- (
bepatient
)
- Sept. 4, 2001, 05:03:41 PM EDT
hate to let a perfectly degenerating thread go to waste.
- (
boxley
)
- (1)
- Sept. 1, 2001, 09:46:19 PM EDT
Ah.. but the *Biggest* 'marketing force' has to be
- (
Ashton
)
- Sept. 2, 2001, 06:41:26 AM EDT
I think there is a definition issue here
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (31)
- Aug. 31, 2001, 01:03:53 PM EDT
Exactly. Thanks.
- (
addison
)
- (30)
- Aug. 31, 2001, 01:26:31 PM EDT
Fine!
- (
imric
)
- (7)
- Aug. 31, 2001, 03:01:33 PM EDT
Market theory assumes idealized conditions.
- (
drewk
)
- (2)
- Aug. 31, 2001, 03:30:55 PM EDT
Oh, shut the (*#@$ up.
- (
addison
)
- (1)
- Aug. 31, 2001, 04:21:11 PM EDT
*chuckle*
-NT
- (
imric
)
- Aug. 31, 2001, 06:59:00 PM EDT
Re: Fine!
- (
addison
)
- (3)
- Aug. 31, 2001, 04:15:20 PM EDT
Thanks for an illuminating thread, all.
- (
Ashton
)
- Aug. 31, 2001, 06:58:46 PM EDT
Aieee!
- (
imric
)
- Aug. 31, 2001, 07:53:09 PM EDT
In support of your position
- (
boxley
)
- Sept. 1, 2001, 09:56:04 PM EDT
Where do you get this stuff from???
- (
CRConrad
)
- (21)
- Aug. 31, 2001, 07:11:55 PM EDT
Many years of econ classes.
- (
addison
)
- (17)
- Aug. 31, 2001, 09:25:02 PM EDT
How many? And of *what* -- Econ 101, over and over again...?
- (
CRConrad
)
- (6)
- Sept. 2, 2001, 06:46:18 PM EDT
3.
- (
addison
)
- Sept. 2, 2001, 10:59:10 PM EDT
Apologies to Mr. Smith, for having blamed him for
- (
Ashton
)
- Sept. 2, 2001, 11:45:04 PM EDT
Natural monopoly
- (
bepatient
)
- (3)
- Sept. 2, 2001, 11:50:10 PM EDT
yeah right Auburn :-)
- (
boxley
)
- Sept. 3, 2001, 01:08:08 AM EDT
yeah right Auburn :-)
- (
boxley
)
- (1)
- Sept. 3, 2001, 01:08:09 AM EDT
Just had to give the credit....
- (
bepatient
)
- Sept. 3, 2001, 09:53:50 AM EDT
Not just time but method
- (
mhuber
)
- (9)
- Sept. 4, 2001, 01:34:20 PM EDT
Yep...sometimes what is substituted...
- (
bepatient
)
- (8)
- Sept. 4, 2001, 03:53:36 PM EDT
How so?
- (
Silverlock
)
- (7)
- Sept. 4, 2001, 04:05:31 PM EDT
Issues...
- (
bepatient
)
- (6)
- Sept. 4, 2001, 04:26:50 PM EDT
Good! the nitty-gritty.. finally.
- (
Ashton
)
- Sept. 4, 2001, 05:23:42 PM EDT
I figured Billy needs a personal punishment.
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (3)
- Sept. 4, 2001, 05:37:30 PM EDT
Well...
- (
bepatient
)
- Sept. 4, 2001, 07:59:40 PM EDT
Then why didn't you describe one? :-)
- (
static
)
- (1)
- Sept. 4, 2001, 09:23:24 PM EDT
Nope. Then he'd go into politics directly, 'stead of buying'
-NT
- (
Ashton
)
- Sept. 4, 2001, 10:48:04 PM EDT
Re: Issues...
- (
addison
)
- Sept. 4, 2001, 10:16:30 PM EDT
Oh it will...
- (
bepatient
)
- (1)
- Aug. 31, 2001, 10:18:01 PM EDT
Well... we are still waiting on that last supposition
- (
Ashton
)
- Sept. 1, 2001, 12:37:37 AM EDT
AT&T
- (
wharris2
)
- Sept. 1, 2001, 03:23:32 AM EDT
i
we
they
.org
The LRPD wots of things you wot not of.
332 ms