then constraints on monopoly conditions (antitrust legislation) should be (easily?) representa

Well, that's up to you to *do* that (and what I've been asking for).

Oh. Sorry. I guess I lack the command of econ-speak to make my point

You're lacking the above - show that its easily represented, first, because that's how you show "market forces".

So you're wanting *me* to prove your point, and insisting its easy, but you're not doing it. :)

Excellent! Then since constraints on monopoly are easy to repre

And that's not constraints *on* a monopoly, its *monopoly conditions*. That's showable.


But the entire crux here is back the first part -that's YOUR job to produce that to prove me wrong.

Addison