Bill Gates's way, or no way - (addison) - (105) - Aug. 29, 2001, 12:33:21 PM EDT
         A lesson - - (imric) - (104) - Aug. 29, 2001, 05:52:42 PM EDT
             At last I see, the only viable solution next: - (Ashton) - Aug. 29, 2001, 09:25:47 PM EDT
             Wrong lesson. - (addison) - (102) - Aug. 29, 2001, 09:36:45 PM EDT
                 This faith may not be entirely misplaced but.. - (Ashton) - Aug. 29, 2001, 11:08:56 PM EDT
                 And the Thousand Year Reich would have corrected itself . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (7) - Aug. 30, 2001, 02:16:16 AM EDT
                     Touch\ufffd____cackle___cackle_____Market Forces for Dummies\ufffd - (Ashton) - Aug. 30, 2001, 06:03:23 AM EDT
                     Markets, Andrew, not Governments. - (addison) - (5) - Aug. 30, 2001, 09:38:10 AM EDT
                         False Godwin. - (inthane-chan) - (1) - Aug. 30, 2001, 10:39:19 AM EDT
                             False False godwin. - (addison) - Aug. 30, 2001, 11:19:19 AM EDT
                         I fail to see the difference. - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - Aug. 30, 2001, 11:32:44 AM EDT
                             The one sentence version - (Andrew Grygus) - Aug. 30, 2001, 11:57:39 AM EDT
                             I agree, its a failing. :) - (addison) - Aug. 30, 2001, 01:28:37 PM EDT
                 I disagree. - (Another Scott) - (15) - Aug. 30, 2001, 10:04:50 AM EDT
                     Re: I disagree. - (addison) - (14) - Aug. 30, 2001, 11:38:00 AM EDT
                         The infrastructure would still be there . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (4) - Aug. 30, 2001, 12:02:42 PM EDT
                             That's a "presume" not a "simply". - (addison) - (3) - Aug. 30, 2001, 01:31:49 PM EDT
                                 What's Microsoft's ratio of "plants, trucks, etc"... - (CRConrad) - (1) - Aug. 30, 2001, 01:55:20 PM EDT
                                     Erm. I think you got mixed up. - (addison) - Aug. 30, 2001, 02:16:00 PM EDT
                                 Counterexample. - (a6l6e6x) - Aug. 30, 2001, 05:02:12 PM EDT
                         SOAP - (Decco Dave) - (8) - Sept. 1, 2001, 11:28:08 AM EDT
                             Needs more washing - (addison) - (3) - Sept. 1, 2001, 11:56:40 AM EDT
                                 Re: Needs more washing - (Decco Dave) - (2) - Sept. 3, 2001, 11:16:10 PM EDT
                                     Needs a LOT more washing. - (addison) - (1) - Sept. 4, 2001, 12:53:45 AM EDT
                                         Interoperation? - (Decco Dave) - Sept. 4, 2001, 12:28:29 PM EDT
                             Re: SOAP - MS 'invented' SOAP ? - (dmarker2) - (1) - Sept. 1, 2001, 12:06:52 PM EDT
                                 Pleasing MS - (Decco Dave) - Sept. 3, 2001, 11:29:09 PM EDT
                             Microsoft did not invent SOAP. - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - Sept. 1, 2001, 01:00:45 PM EDT
                                 Dave Winer. - (static) - Sept. 3, 2001, 12:27:38 AM EDT
                 Antitrust law IS a 'market correction' -NT - (imric) - (76) - Aug. 30, 2001, 05:29:26 PM EDT
                     No, its an artificial outside influence, like ceiling/floors -NT - (addison) - (43) - Aug. 30, 2001, 08:51:54 PM EDT
                         Wrong. - (imric) - (42) - Aug. 30, 2001, 10:34:33 PM EDT
                             If you insist on perverting the language, fine. - (addison) - (41) - Aug. 31, 2001, 12:24:14 AM EDT
                                 noting previous antitrust vs. Microsoft - (wharris2) - (1) - Aug. 31, 2001, 04:46:23 AM EDT
                                     Absolute faith in a simplistic concept, 'free market' - (Ashton) - Aug. 31, 2001, 06:18:55 AM EDT
                                 So hostile... - (imric) - (38) - Aug. 31, 2001, 09:58:40 AM EDT
                                     Because its a "concept" that disallows agreement. - (addison) - (37) - Aug. 31, 2001, 10:24:01 AM EDT
                                         Now we know - (Silverlock) - (4) - Aug. 31, 2001, 11:19:48 AM EDT
                                             Re: Now we know - (addison) - (3) - Aug. 31, 2001, 01:15:35 PM EDT
                                                 Just going by history - (Silverlock) - (2) - Aug. 31, 2001, 01:58:22 PM EDT
                                                     I suggest you repeat History, you've forgotten it. - (addison) - (1) - Aug. 31, 2001, 02:08:36 PM EDT
                                                         Sorry dude, you just rub me the wrong way - (Silverlock) - Aug. 31, 2001, 02:29:17 PM EDT
                                         Sure. Whatever. - (imric) - (3) - Aug. 31, 2001, 11:32:36 AM EDT
                                             Re: Sure. Whatever. - (addison) - (2) - Aug. 31, 2001, 01:12:21 PM EDT
                                                 ? - (imric) - (1) - Aug. 31, 2001, 03:09:58 PM EDT
                                                     You've gotten confused. - (addison) - Aug. 31, 2001, 04:19:13 PM EDT
                                         Shoplifting is a market force . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - Aug. 31, 2001, 12:02:23 PM EDT
                                             WOT - (jbrabeck) - Aug. 31, 2001, 01:08:52 PM EDT
                                             Not really. - (addison) - Aug. 31, 2001, 01:24:39 PM EDT
                                         Huh??? - (CRConrad) - (4) - Aug. 31, 2001, 07:12:14 PM EDT
                                             Context, CRC, context. - (addison) - (3) - Aug. 31, 2001, 09:43:06 PM EDT
                                                 What, you think BeeP is the only economist in here??? - (CRConrad) - (2) - Sept. 2, 2001, 07:09:18 PM EDT
                                                     No idea how many there are in here. - (addison) - Sept. 2, 2001, 10:45:15 PM EDT
                                                     Econometrics...cool - (bepatient) - Sept. 2, 2001, 11:34:12 PM EDT
                                         Good point... - (hnick) - (17) - Sept. 1, 2001, 10:54:07 AM EDT
                                             Two approaches to "the market" - (Andrew Grygus) - (16) - Sept. 1, 2001, 12:37:56 PM EDT
                                                 Re: Two approaches to "the market" - (addison) - (11) - Sept. 1, 2001, 01:14:28 PM EDT
                                                     BTW: - (addison) - (10) - Sept. 1, 2001, 01:15:40 PM EDT
                                                         Which is why you adhere . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (9) - Sept. 1, 2001, 01:55:31 PM EDT
                                                             Which is why I asked... - (addison) - (8) - Sept. 1, 2001, 02:56:56 PM EDT
                                                                 How "Super Buys" work . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (7) - Sept. 1, 2001, 04:25:28 PM EDT
                                                                     Hey! I think I see a 'graph' in there________:-\ufffd - (Ashton) - (1) - Sept. 1, 2001, 05:12:49 PM EDT
                                                                         Adventures in marketing #48734655j - (Andrew Grygus) - Sept. 1, 2001, 05:56:44 PM EDT
                                                                     Or, for the 'engineering model' - (Ashton) - (1) - Sept. 1, 2001, 05:38:24 PM EDT
                                                                         No problem - it's "Faith Based" -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - Sept. 1, 2001, 06:52:49 PM EDT
                                                                     Missed item - (wharris2) - (2) - Sept. 3, 2001, 07:11:36 PM EDT
                                                                         dollar stores also - (boxley) - Sept. 3, 2001, 09:23:43 PM EDT
                                                                         No, I got that . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - Sept. 3, 2001, 09:41:16 PM EDT
                                                 Boys boys boys.... - (bepatient) - (3) - Sept. 2, 2001, 01:24:22 PM EDT
                                                     Now don't spoil it, BP - (Ashton) - Sept. 2, 2001, 04:30:42 PM EDT
                                                     How much is this a semantic argument? - (drewk) - (1) - Sept. 4, 2001, 04:35:31 PM EDT
                                                         Definition... - (bepatient) - Sept. 4, 2001, 05:03:41 PM EDT
                                         hate to let a perfectly degenerating thread go to waste. - (boxley) - (1) - Sept. 1, 2001, 09:46:19 PM EDT
                                             Ah.. but the *Biggest* 'marketing force' has to be - (Ashton) - Sept. 2, 2001, 06:41:26 AM EDT
                     I think there is a definition issue here - (ben_tilly) - (31) - Aug. 31, 2001, 01:03:53 PM EDT
                         Exactly. Thanks. - (addison) - (30) - Aug. 31, 2001, 01:26:31 PM EDT
                             Fine! - (imric) - (7) - Aug. 31, 2001, 03:01:33 PM EDT
                                 Market theory assumes idealized conditions. - (drewk) - (2) - Aug. 31, 2001, 03:30:55 PM EDT
                                     Oh, shut the (*#@$ up. - (addison) - (1) - Aug. 31, 2001, 04:21:11 PM EDT
                                         *chuckle* -NT - (imric) - Aug. 31, 2001, 06:59:00 PM EDT
                                 Re: Fine! - (addison) - (3) - Aug. 31, 2001, 04:15:20 PM EDT
                                     Thanks for an illuminating thread, all. - (Ashton) - Aug. 31, 2001, 06:58:46 PM EDT
                                     Aieee! - (imric) - Aug. 31, 2001, 07:53:09 PM EDT
                                     In support of your position - (boxley) - Sept. 1, 2001, 09:56:04 PM EDT
                             Where do you get this stuff from??? - (CRConrad) - (21) - Aug. 31, 2001, 07:11:55 PM EDT
                                 Many years of econ classes. - (addison) - (17) - Aug. 31, 2001, 09:25:02 PM EDT
                                     How many? And of *what* -- Econ 101, over and over again...? - (CRConrad) - (6) - Sept. 2, 2001, 06:46:18 PM EDT
                                         3. - (addison) - Sept. 2, 2001, 10:59:10 PM EDT
                                         Apologies to Mr. Smith, for having blamed him for - (Ashton) - Sept. 2, 2001, 11:45:04 PM EDT
                                         Natural monopoly - (bepatient) - (3) - Sept. 2, 2001, 11:50:10 PM EDT
                                             yeah right Auburn :-) - (boxley) - Sept. 3, 2001, 01:08:08 AM EDT
                                             yeah right Auburn :-) - (boxley) - (1) - Sept. 3, 2001, 01:08:09 AM EDT
                                                 Just had to give the credit.... - (bepatient) - Sept. 3, 2001, 09:53:50 AM EDT
                                     Not just time but method - (mhuber) - (9) - Sept. 4, 2001, 01:34:20 PM EDT
                                         Yep...sometimes what is substituted... - (bepatient) - (8) - Sept. 4, 2001, 03:53:36 PM EDT
                                             How so? - (Silverlock) - (7) - Sept. 4, 2001, 04:05:31 PM EDT
                                                 Issues... - (bepatient) - (6) - Sept. 4, 2001, 04:26:50 PM EDT
                                                     Good! the nitty-gritty.. finally. - (Ashton) - Sept. 4, 2001, 05:23:42 PM EDT
                                                     I figured Billy needs a personal punishment. - (Andrew Grygus) - (3) - Sept. 4, 2001, 05:37:30 PM EDT
                                                         Well... - (bepatient) - Sept. 4, 2001, 07:59:40 PM EDT
                                                         Then why didn't you describe one? :-) - (static) - (1) - Sept. 4, 2001, 09:23:24 PM EDT
                                                             Nope. Then he'd go into politics directly, 'stead of buying' -NT - (Ashton) - Sept. 4, 2001, 10:48:04 PM EDT
                                                     Re: Issues... - (addison) - Sept. 4, 2001, 10:16:30 PM EDT
                                 Oh it will... - (bepatient) - (1) - Aug. 31, 2001, 10:18:01 PM EDT
                                     Well... we are still waiting on that last supposition - (Ashton) - Sept. 1, 2001, 12:37:37 AM EDT
                                 AT&T - (wharris2) - Sept. 1, 2001, 03:23:32 AM EDT