I said she is not a religious intolerant

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 2 active users | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #283,797 by Seamus 5/3/07 11:05:52 AM Reply	I said she is not a religious intolerant Meaning she won't be pushing any faith based initiatives. Nor, hopefully, would she be viewed as pursuing a religious war. Can't say the same for Shrub. As for personal grievances, I have no idea where she ranks compare to the other dems, but I haven't seen any evidence it has affected her Senatorial performance. Again, I can't say the same thing about Shrub and his personal problems affecting his presidential performance. Nor his performance as Gov. of Texas. Seamus
Post #283,799 by boxley 5/3/07 11:10:56 AM Reply	what a huge blind spot she creates in some folks no matter what she does, or who she does it to, a huge pass is given. Look there is a reason her trustworthiness and dislike poll numbers are where they are. I guess some folks are to the clintons what the die hard shrubbies are to the current mess. thanx, bill Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 51 years. meep reach me at [link\|mailto:bill.oxley@cox.net\|mailto:bill.oxley@cox.net]
Post #283,800 by Seamus 5/3/07 11:17:02 AM Reply	I am not giving her a pass, just not comparing her to Shrub She maybe smarter than Bill, but she doesn't seem to have his instincts. She doesn't come off as a natural politician too me. I am not going to vote for her in the primary, but I definitely wouldn't vote for a repo just because she is on the ticket. She seems to push your buttons for some reason. Seamus

Some 2008 contribution demographics - (Seamus) - (92) - April 28, 2007, 12:29:24 PM EDT

name the candidate who is not an lawyer :-( -NT - (boxley) - (1) - April 28, 2007, 12:32:54 PM EDT

"A lawyer" [or "an attorney"]. HTH! -NT - (CRConrad) - April 28, 2007, 03:58:14 PM EDT

And guess who owns the skank? - (a6l6e6x) - (89) - April 30, 2007, 10:10:02 PM EDT

the industrialists thought that they owned hitler atthe time -NT - (boxley) - May 1, 2007, 10:09:43 AM EDT

Et tu, Alexus? - (CRConrad) - (87) - May 1, 2007, 04:14:02 PM EDT

if she was black - (boxley) - (5) - May 1, 2007, 04:54:59 PM EDT

I was looking for comments from you - (Seamus) - (3) - May 1, 2007, 05:35:54 PM EDT

no worries, coudnt tell anything under the cottage cheese -NT - (boxley) - (2) - May 1, 2007, 05:57:45 PM EDT

So you're an ageist also? -NT - (Silverlock) - (1) - May 2, 2007, 07:46:41 PM EDT

nope Im an assist - (boxley) - May 2, 2007, 09:38:15 PM EDT

Thank you for proving my point so conclusively. -NT - (CRConrad) - May 2, 2007, 05:50:35 PM EDT

Mrs. Clinton delighteth me not, but - (rcareaga) - (80) - May 1, 2007, 08:48:51 PM EDT

dont mind sex meself - (boxley) - (2) - May 1, 2007, 10:16:31 PM EDT

Yeah, it does. - (pwhysall) - (1) - May 5, 2007, 02:04:43 AM EDT

Amen! - (jb4) - May 8, 2007, 11:28:18 AM EDT

Not misogyny, my friend. - (a6l6e6x) - (76) - May 1, 2007, 10:37:52 PM EDT

Dunno. - (Another Scott) - (1) - May 1, 2007, 11:03:02 PM EDT

Who are you going to believe? - (a6l6e6x) - May 2, 2007, 08:18:56 AM EDT

Not originally your own, perhaps. - (CRConrad) - (73) - May 2, 2007, 05:49:43 PM EDT

I'll grant you that the skank term comes from Box. - (a6l6e6x) - (72) - May 2, 2007, 08:57:05 PM EDT

The "speaking ebonics" meme was debunked long ago - (Silverlock) - (2) - May 2, 2007, 10:04:12 PM EDT

Here's a sample. - (a6l6e6x) - (1) - May 3, 2007, 10:51:17 PM EDT

Now that you've confirmed she was quoting a hymn - (Silverlock) - May 4, 2007, 05:31:29 AM EDT

Look, she's just another ambitious pol - (rcareaga) - (68) - May 2, 2007, 11:17:39 PM EDT

lemme explain to the unwashed - (boxley) - (32) - May 2, 2007, 11:44:38 PM EDT

Why? - (crazy) - (31) - May 3, 2007, 06:54:09 AM EDT

shrub with brains, that doesnt scare you? -NT - (boxley) - (30) - May 3, 2007, 09:36:41 AM EDT

Shrub she is not - (Seamus) - (4) - May 3, 2007, 10:52:15 AM EDT

tolerant? ya gotta be kidding - (boxley) - (3) - May 3, 2007, 10:54:36 AM EDT

I said she is not a religious intolerant - (Seamus) - (2) - May 3, 2007, 11:05:52 AM EDT

what a huge blind spot she creates in some folks - (boxley) - (1) - May 3, 2007, 11:10:56 AM EDT

I am not giving her a pass, just not comparing her to Shrub - (Seamus) - May 3, 2007, 11:17:02 AM EDT

Sbrub with brains... - (jb4) - (1) - May 3, 2007, 09:07:39 PM EDT

vicous trogdelyte that thinks? I agree -NT - (boxley) - May 3, 2007, 09:44:29 PM EDT

Bullsh*t - (crazy) - (22) - May 3, 2007, 11:10:11 PM EDT

Geffen's quote - (bepatient) - (21) - May 4, 2007, 12:38:10 AM EDT

In many way's that just means she's a politician - (Seamus) - May 4, 2007, 07:45:31 AM EDT

You are confusing tacticts with goals - (crazy) - (9) - May 4, 2007, 02:25:33 PM EDT

What is it with you all. - (bepatient) - (8) - May 4, 2007, 04:18:32 PM EDT

You didn't but the thread had devolved into a Bush vs - (Seamus) - (7) - May 4, 2007, 05:32:29 PM EDT

If they were running against each other - (bepatient) - (6) - May 4, 2007, 09:00:37 PM EDT

And that means you're a fricking wingnut. -NT - (CRConrad) - (5) - May 6, 2007, 08:20:18 AM EDT

How so exactly? - (bepatient) - (4) - May 6, 2007, 11:15:37 AM EDT

By NOT voting AGAINST the abomination. - (CRConrad) - (3) - May 6, 2007, 11:24:02 AM EDT

Sorry, ain't buying what you're selling - (bepatient) - (2) - May 6, 2007, 11:41:02 AM EDT

Easy. - (Another Scott) - (1) - May 6, 2007, 12:31:12 PM EDT

Your "logic" is prejudiced - (bepatient) - May 6, 2007, 01:10:14 PM EDT

Compare and contrast w/ current "Administration"... -NT - (jb4) - (9) - May 8, 2007, 11:29:37 AM EDT

So your argument is "they do it too so it must be ok?" - (bepatient) - (8) - May 20, 2007, 02:36:05 AM EDT

No my argument is: Put yer shock and awe in yer pocket - (jb4) - (1) - May 8, 2007, 05:56:16 PM EDT

Seen what, exactly? - (bepatient) - May 9, 2007, 10:39:37 AM EDT

"You're"? Sigh... -NT - (CRConrad) - (5) - May 19, 2007, 06:39:24 PM EDT

huh? -NT - (bepatient) - (4) - May 20, 2007, 02:36:32 AM EDT

Google may be Your Friend... - (CRConrad) - (3) - May 20, 2007, 03:13:33 AM EDT

Yabut.. Shirley - - (Ashton) - (1) - May 20, 2007, 04:43:06 AM EDT

Yeah, I know - I was trying to indicate my being... - (CRConrad) - May 21, 2007, 05:35:23 AM EDT

Yabut...ppl only read headlines! -NT - (bepatient) - May 20, 2007, 10:37:09 AM EDT

Agreed. It bothers me when Dems use Repubs talking points. - (Another Scott) - (28) - May 3, 2007, 12:03:52 AM EDT

It shouldn't matter who says what. - (a6l6e6x) - (27) - May 4, 2007, 11:21:01 AM EDT

No it shouldn't matter - (Seamus) - (25) - May 4, 2007, 11:27:56 AM EDT

not at all, here is the definition - (boxley) - (24) - May 4, 2007, 11:43:59 AM EDT

By that definition almost all of the politicians are skanks - (Seamus) - (18) - May 4, 2007, 12:02:20 PM EDT

I like this quote - (boxley) - (17) - May 4, 2007, 12:32:46 PM EDT

Alot of the animosity comes from Clintons being as sucessful - (Seamus) - (16) - May 4, 2007, 12:50:46 PM EDT

what lttle non entities did they crush? -NT - (boxley) - (15) - May 4, 2007, 02:13:23 PM EDT

Delay and Blankenship Gringrich and his ex-wives - (Seamus) - (5) - May 4, 2007, 03:18:03 PM EDT

blankenship is not a little people and an exwife - (boxley) - (4) - May 4, 2007, 04:29:36 PM EDT

I am not championing her by any means - (Seamus) - (3) - May 4, 2007, 04:43:48 PM EDT

And that makes YOU, too, a right-wing-nut. - (CRConrad) - (2) - May 6, 2007, 08:27:19 AM EDT

I said it tongue in cheek and I should have indicated that - (Seamus) - May 6, 2007, 11:08:22 AM EDT

You're out of your head. - (bepatient) - May 6, 2007, 11:19:12 AM EDT

You ARE kidding, right? - (jb4) - (8) - May 8, 2007, 11:39:41 AM EDT

name one individual little person that delay hosed over - (boxley) - (7) - May 8, 2007, 12:27:59 PM EDT

The way you are going on about the waitress issue - (Seamus) - May 8, 2007, 01:18:27 PM EDT

Hi. Let me intorduce myself. - (jb4) - (5) - May 8, 2007, 06:02:30 PM EDT

quit waggin yer weinie, not the same at all -NT - (boxley) - (4) - May 8, 2007, 06:06:12 PM EDT

No not the same at all - (Seamus) - (3) - May 8, 2007, 07:08:36 PM EDT

it would matter if more than 1/2 VOTED till then - (boxley) - (2) - May 8, 2007, 07:11:09 PM EDT

We go to war with the electorate we have - (Seamus) - (1) - May 8, 2007, 07:18:17 PM EDT

Nicely said! -NT - (jb4) - May 13, 2007, 09:52:14 PM EDT

So, y'all show us where you've called Shrub a skank as often -NT - (CRConrad) - (4) - May 6, 2007, 08:24:05 AM EDT

skank is a female word although skanky is indegenderate - (boxley) - (3) - May 6, 2007, 10:54:37 AM EDT

Actually not equal, AFAICS / IMO. - (CRConrad) - (2) - May 6, 2007, 11:26:11 AM EDT

Nowhere near, IMO - (pwhysall) - (1) - May 6, 2007, 11:50:29 AM EDT

depends on whether you are one dunnit? - (boxley) - May 6, 2007, 07:52:05 PM EDT

It's hard to tell what's true, sometimes. - (Another Scott) - May 4, 2007, 12:25:23 PM EDT

You can believe what you like. - (a6l6e6x) - (5) - May 4, 2007, 10:57:23 AM EDT

I think that one of the biggest strikes against her... - (Another Scott) - (1) - May 4, 2007, 11:17:11 AM EDT

What Obama reminds me of. - (mmoffitt) - May 4, 2007, 06:22:35 PM EDT

So, did you call HIM such NASTY things? No? Q.E. frickin' D! -NT - (CRConrad) - (2) - May 6, 2007, 08:30:34 AM EDT

That may be. - (a6l6e6x) - (1) - May 6, 2007, 10:46:51 AM EDT

The only candidate to ever get my dough was Jerry Brown. ;0) -NT - (mmoffitt) - May 7, 2007, 12:01:05 PM EDT

Sit down there, you. Your WoMS have no effect on me anymore.
94 ms