Not the point

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #261,627 by jake123 7/13/06 5:05:08 PM Reply	Not the point Taste is inarguable, but you can't call them crummy; they are good at what they do. There is a craft as well as art to music, and the craft is something that can be argued about. By any view of the craft of playing music, they do it well. If you can't see that distinction, you're seeing daylight too. --\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton jake at consultron.ca \n [link\|http://consultron.ca\|http://consultron.ca] [link\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] \n Kingston Ontario Canada [link\|news://news.consultron.ca\|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
Post #261,629 by admin 7/13/06 5:09:58 PM Reply	I can too call it crummy music "Crummy music" == music I do not like to listen to. The phrase is inherently subjective, and as such you can't tell me what I can call crummy. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #261,643 by jake123 7/13/06 6:50:57 PM Reply	Not in common usage up here when you say crummy, you definitely cast aspersions on competence. Here's an example; have you ever heard of a crummy programmer? Why were they crummy? Was it a question of taste? Or competence? --\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton jake at consultron.ca \n [link\|http://consultron.ca\|http://consultron.ca] [link\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] \n Kingston Ontario Canada [link\|news://news.consultron.ca\|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
Post #261,644 by admin 7/13/06 7:12:15 PM Reply	I didn't say they were crummy. I said the music was crummy. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."

Does she have >any< clue? - (bepatient) - (44) - July 12, 2006, 11:28:28 PM EDT

Not running for office is she? - (Silverlock) - (29) - July 12, 2006, 11:35:07 PM EDT

No, she's destroying their careers. - (bepatient) - (28) - July 13, 2006, 10:57:35 AM EDT

Interesting position - (drewk) - (27) - July 13, 2006, 11:02:42 AM EDT

Well, it could be taken that way. - (bepatient) - (4) - July 13, 2006, 11:13:47 AM EDT

Why wonder? - (drewk) - (1) - July 13, 2006, 11:28:08 AM EDT

The first was a response to - (bepatient) - July 13, 2006, 12:51:44 PM EDT

I've heard interviews - (broomberg) - July 13, 2006, 11:30:03 AM EDT

They're changing their audience anyway - (admin) - July 13, 2006, 11:49:03 AM EDT

You can state your opinion without insulting your fans - (tonytib) - (21) - July 13, 2006, 11:36:18 AM EDT

You think the interview was insulting? - (drewk) - (20) - July 13, 2006, 11:44:30 AM EDT

Yes - (tonytib) - (19) - July 13, 2006, 11:59:36 AM EDT

That's not insulting - (drewk) - (18) - July 13, 2006, 12:18:38 PM EDT

Mr K, c'mon now. The statement goes far beyond being "anti-" - (bepatient) - (17) - July 13, 2006, 12:56:14 PM EDT

Context is important. - (Another Scott) - (4) - July 13, 2006, 01:11:24 PM EDT

Wasn't in der spiegel - (bepatient) - (3) - July 13, 2006, 01:32:00 PM EDT

Thanks. I wonder about the editing though. - (Another Scott) - (2) - July 13, 2006, 02:46:50 PM EDT

Seems to me that she used the wrong word. - (jb4) - (1) - July 13, 2006, 03:37:38 PM EDT

I think you nailed it. -NT - (Silverlock) - July 13, 2006, 03:39:58 PM EDT

No, it is not anti-everything - (ben_tilly) - (3) - July 13, 2006, 01:51:23 PM EDT

Patrotism, n. Combustible rubbish . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - July 13, 2006, 02:02:21 PM EDT

:-) -NT - (Another Scott) - July 13, 2006, 02:47:44 PM EDT

If that was what she had said - (bepatient) - July 13, 2006, 03:36:09 PM EDT

Waidaminnit, there, BeeP - (jb4) - (1) - July 13, 2006, 03:31:34 PM EDT

Change your filters there bub. - (bepatient) - July 13, 2006, 03:38:02 PM EDT

Couple quotes for you. - (mmoffitt) - (5) - July 14, 2006, 11:01:26 AM EDT

Nice! yours are better organized. 'Tis folly though :-/ - (Ashton) - July 14, 2006, 04:06:22 PM EDT

Both well stated opinions. - (bepatient) - (3) - July 15, 2006, 11:22:45 AM EDT

Pop tastes change. - (Another Scott) - (2) - July 15, 2006, 11:47:48 AM EDT

While this disk - (bepatient) - (1) - July 15, 2006, 12:08:57 PM EDT

Mob taste can change capriciously in weird times - (Ashton) - July 16, 2006, 01:20:59 AM EDT

Makes me want to buy her CD... -NT - (ben_tilly) - (1) - July 13, 2006, 12:52:09 AM EDT

Already did. -NT - (jb4) - July 13, 2006, 03:39:12 PM EDT

Has she never read the Dictionary? - (Ashton) - July 13, 2006, 03:42:40 AM EDT

Who gives a shit, anyway? - (pwhysall) - (10) - July 13, 2006, 04:20:10 PM EDT

you == me - (admin) - (9) - July 13, 2006, 04:24:08 PM EDT

As a guitarist - (jake123) - (8) - July 13, 2006, 04:28:58 PM EDT

So can Ritchie Blackmore - (pwhysall) - (7) - July 13, 2006, 04:39:05 PM EDT

Maybe - (bionerd) - July 13, 2006, 04:47:21 PM EDT

OH, I get it. - (jb4) - (1) - July 13, 2006, 04:58:44 PM EDT

. <-- The point You --> .o/ - (pwhysall) - July 13, 2006, 05:11:23 PM EDT

Not the point - (jake123) - (3) - July 13, 2006, 05:05:08 PM EDT

I can too call it crummy music - (admin) - (2) - July 13, 2006, 05:09:58 PM EDT

Not in common usage up here - (jake123) - (1) - July 13, 2006, 06:50:57 PM EDT

I didn't say they were crummy. I said the music was crummy. -NT - (admin) - July 13, 2006, 07:12:15 PM EDT

iwethey.org

Yow!
227 ms