IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / The Water Cooler Forum / OH, I get it.
Post #261,626
by jb4
Picture of jb4
7/13/06 4:58:44 PM
Reply
New OH, I get it.
All artists must conform to Peter Whysall's own version of Political Correctness, or everything they do, have ever done, or will possibly do in the future is cack.

10-4, Elenore!
jb4
"So don't pay attention to the approval ratings that say 68% of Americans disapprove of the job this man is doing. I ask you this, does that not also logically mean that 68% approve of the job he's not doing? Think about it. I haven't."
— Stephen Colbert, at the White House Correspondent's Dinner 29Apr06
Post #261,630
by pwhysall
Picture of pwhysall
7/13/06 5:11:23 PM
Reply
New . <-- The point You --> .o/
That's you, foaming away, having missed the point.

RB is an amazing guitarist. He's also a totally self-obsessed wanker, which is why he got booted from band after band. He's also prone to talking bollocks.

That's probably because he's an amazing guitarist.

The Dixie Chicks are a mainstream pap band, who are perfectly competent at what they do. They're far from competent at politics, but because they have a platform they insist on wibbling on about things they'd be better off keeping schtum about.

THAT was my point. I couldn't care less about the audible output of either the Dixie Chicks or Ritchie Blackmore.

Peter
[link|http://www.no2id.net/|Don't Let The Terrorists Win]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
[link|http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?pwhysall|A better terminal emulator]
     Does she have >any< clue? - (bepatient) - (44) - July 12, 2006, 11:28:28 PM EDT
         Not running for office is she? - (Silverlock) - (29) - July 12, 2006, 11:35:07 PM EDT
             No, she's destroying their careers. - (bepatient) - (28) - July 13, 2006, 10:57:35 AM EDT
                 Interesting position - (drewk) - (27) - July 13, 2006, 11:02:42 AM EDT
                     Well, it could be taken that way. - (bepatient) - (4) - July 13, 2006, 11:13:47 AM EDT
                         Why wonder? - (drewk) - (1) - July 13, 2006, 11:28:08 AM EDT
                             The first was a response to - (bepatient) - July 13, 2006, 12:51:44 PM EDT
                         I've heard interviews - (broomberg) - July 13, 2006, 11:30:03 AM EDT
                         They're changing their audience anyway - (admin) - July 13, 2006, 11:49:03 AM EDT
                     You can state your opinion without insulting your fans - (tonytib) - (21) - July 13, 2006, 11:36:18 AM EDT
                         You think the interview was insulting? - (drewk) - (20) - July 13, 2006, 11:44:30 AM EDT
                             Yes - (tonytib) - (19) - July 13, 2006, 11:59:36 AM EDT
                                 That's not insulting - (drewk) - (18) - July 13, 2006, 12:18:38 PM EDT
                                     Mr K, c'mon now. The statement goes far beyond being "anti-" - (bepatient) - (17) - July 13, 2006, 12:56:14 PM EDT
                                         Context is important. - (Another Scott) - (4) - July 13, 2006, 01:11:24 PM EDT
                                             Wasn't in der spiegel - (bepatient) - (3) - July 13, 2006, 01:32:00 PM EDT
                                                 Thanks. I wonder about the editing though. - (Another Scott) - (2) - July 13, 2006, 02:46:50 PM EDT
                                                     Seems to me that she used the wrong word. - (jb4) - (1) - July 13, 2006, 03:37:38 PM EDT
                                                         I think you nailed it. -NT - (Silverlock) - July 13, 2006, 03:39:58 PM EDT
                                         No, it is not anti-everything - (ben_tilly) - (3) - July 13, 2006, 01:51:23 PM EDT
                                             Patrotism, n. Combustible rubbish . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - July 13, 2006, 02:02:21 PM EDT
                                                 :-) -NT - (Another Scott) - July 13, 2006, 02:47:44 PM EDT
                                             If that was what she had said - (bepatient) - July 13, 2006, 03:36:09 PM EDT
                                         Waidaminnit, there, BeeP - (jb4) - (1) - July 13, 2006, 03:31:34 PM EDT
                                             Change your filters there bub. - (bepatient) - July 13, 2006, 03:38:02 PM EDT
                                         Couple quotes for you. - (mmoffitt) - (5) - July 14, 2006, 11:01:26 AM EDT
                                             Nice! yours are better organized. 'Tis folly though :-/ - (Ashton) - July 14, 2006, 04:06:22 PM EDT
                                             Both well stated opinions. - (bepatient) - (3) - July 15, 2006, 11:22:45 AM EDT
                                                 Pop tastes change. - (Another Scott) - (2) - July 15, 2006, 11:47:48 AM EDT
                                                     While this disk - (bepatient) - (1) - July 15, 2006, 12:08:57 PM EDT
                                                         Mob taste can change capriciously in weird times - (Ashton) - July 16, 2006, 01:20:59 AM EDT
         Makes me want to buy her CD... -NT - (ben_tilly) - (1) - July 13, 2006, 12:52:09 AM EDT
             Already did. -NT - (jb4) - July 13, 2006, 03:39:12 PM EDT
         Has she never read the Dictionary? - (Ashton) - July 13, 2006, 03:42:40 AM EDT
         Who gives a shit, anyway? - (pwhysall) - (10) - July 13, 2006, 04:20:10 PM EDT
             you == me - (admin) - (9) - July 13, 2006, 04:24:08 PM EDT
                 As a guitarist - (jake123) - (8) - July 13, 2006, 04:28:58 PM EDT
                     So can Ritchie Blackmore - (pwhysall) - (7) - July 13, 2006, 04:39:05 PM EDT
                         Maybe - (bionerd) - July 13, 2006, 04:47:21 PM EDT
                         OH, I get it. - (jb4) - (1) - July 13, 2006, 04:58:44 PM EDT
                             . <-- The point You --> .o/ - (pwhysall) - July 13, 2006, 05:11:23 PM EDT
                         Not the point - (jake123) - (3) - July 13, 2006, 05:05:08 PM EDT
                             I can too call it crummy music - (admin) - (2) - July 13, 2006, 05:09:58 PM EDT
                                 Not in common usage up here - (jake123) - (1) - July 13, 2006, 06:50:57 PM EDT
                                     I didn't say they were crummy. I said the music was crummy. -NT - (admin) - July 13, 2006, 07:12:15 PM EDT

Here, have another hor'd'ouevre.
67 ms