Are you asking me to read the newspaper Judith Miller made (in)famous and take that source as a credible source of accurate information and informed opinion?
What's next? The OpEd's at newsmax?
What's next? The OpEd's at newsmax?
Question.
Are you asking me to read the newspaper Judith Miller made (in)famous and take that source as a credible source of accurate information and informed opinion? What's next? The OpEd's at newsmax? |
|
Answer: Yes
Because although Judith Miller's "reporting" remains a very dark blot on the Grey lady's escutcheon, and an indictment of its editors' cowardice and cringing collaboration as the Cheney Shogunate trampled the Constitution and pawed the earth, the Times remains, rather like the government of Prussia* as Hitler consolidated his hold on Germany, among the last institutional strongholds of resistance. Would you rather rely on the Indianapolis Star? cordially, *I recommend Christopher Clark's Iron Kingdom to anyone interested in the fascinating history of Prussia, including its unjustly ignored resistance to the rise of the Nazis and its dissolution by the victorious Allied powers. More info here, assuming you'll trust the opinion of a Yankee rag. |
|
nope, Washington Post
And they dissect most of your previous arguments as well since you tend to parrot the standard talking points. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/07/30/the-federal-governments-incredibly-poor-misleading-argument-for-marijuana-prohibition/?wpsrc=AG0003376 |
|
Gee, I'm convinced. A stoner made a blog post.
|
|
ah, ad hominem
I'm shocked, I tell you, shocked! Which is the same argument you used against the newspaper above. Shocked! |
|
But even so, I'll bite
http://www.washingtonpost.com/pb/christopher-ingraham https://www.linkedin.com/in/christopheringraham I'd take this guy's analysis over yours on any subject. He does data, not emotion. |