Re: And how many males have

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #157,675 by deSitter 5/30/04 4:13:58 AM Reply	Re: And how many males have All these "issues" - gun control, tree hugging, evil drunk bashing, etc. - are substitute religions. Each involves a sacrifice/offering - the gun, paper, a beer. There is no God, but there is a committee of do-gooders. This represents the first adumbrations of the change of religious guard that accompanies a new age (Animism -> Isis -> Mars -> Jesus -> MADD). An anagram of "do-gooder" is "God-rodeo". -drl
Post #157,677 by Ashton 5/30/04 5:29:10 AM Reply	Top-notch! .. don't forget the Real icon of the age: VISA Were Siva one of them handy personal-Gods what whisper to folks, audition their interminable Sivamas shopping lists .. get them raises n'stuff (and kill off their enemies du jour) -- I'm sure She'd appreciate the anagram.
Post #157,722 by FuManChu 5/30/04 2:08:01 PM Reply	Wow, an anagram! I guess that proves it then. ;)
Post #157,728 by deSitter 5/30/04 2:58:38 PM Reply	There is no doubt ..that the conception of God is changing, and that such changes have occured with remarkable synchrony to the "astrological ages", and that the guiding principle has been exactly that of the corresponding age. Aquarius is the sign of "I love humanity but to hell with my neighbors". We can expect committee-based "humanistic" (in the direct sense, human'ish' but not really human) religion. That is why I am so insistent that we recognize the humanity of Jesus and the other canonical prophets - otherwise we will as a civilization install a made-up "humanishness" to put in the place of the missing humanity - and the result will be a spiritually dead world run by do-gooder committees and strict injunction against being "different". Uranus is a terribly unstable energy. This of course will lead us to the next age, Capricorn - a return with a vengeance to a paranoid cult of personality. -drl

A little Salon *Flash* to remind us - (Ashton) - (84) - May 28, 2004, 06:41:46 AM EDT

If I may paraphrase you: Love ....... It! - (Meerkat) - (1) - May 28, 2004, 06:47:16 AM EDT

not hardly - (boxley) - May 28, 2004, 10:09:04 AM EDT

What a load of cr@p. - (imric) - (81) - May 28, 2004, 09:30:21 AM EDT

That's one way of looking at it. - (pwhysall) - (25) - May 28, 2004, 04:23:51 PM EDT

Put a price tag on it and it's as good as sold... - (hnick) - May 28, 2004, 05:06:37 PM EDT

Chances of getting filled in here are much lower than there - (boxley) - (2) - May 28, 2004, 07:41:17 PM EDT

'filled in'? - (Silverlock) - (1) - May 28, 2004, 08:08:58 PM EDT

euphemism for getting the crap kicked out of you -NT - (boxley) - May 29, 2004, 10:07:27 AM EDT

And how many males have - (imric) - (20) - May 29, 2004, 08:09:56 AM EDT

Well, if your characters are so flawed... - (CRConrad) - (15) - May 29, 2004, 06:26:27 PM EDT

Did I? As if we stood on a par? No. - (imric) - (14) - May 29, 2004, 08:21:15 PM EDT

Re: Did I? As if we stood on a par? No. - (pwhysall) - (3) - May 30, 2004, 04:05:17 AM EDT

They do - (jake123) - (2) - May 30, 2004, 11:03:35 AM EDT

Wrong guns are designed only to kill humans - (boxley) - (1) - May 30, 2004, 11:27:12 AM EDT

The answer is "does not approve of any killing" - (jake123) - May 30, 2004, 11:33:27 AM EDT

Did I? Is that a cogent counter to my argument? No. - (CRConrad) - (9) - May 30, 2004, 05:44:42 PM EDT

No it's not enough. - (imric) - (2) - May 30, 2004, 07:04:14 PM EDT

You're misunderstanding me completely. (And intentionally?) - (CRConrad) - (1) - May 31, 2004, 03:30:50 AM EDT

+ OK... -NT - (imric) - May 31, 2004, 03:33:48 AM EDT

the big disconnect between us - (boxley) - (5) - May 30, 2004, 07:28:09 PM EDT

He has post Nazi PC disease - (deSitter) - (1) - May 30, 2004, 07:31:55 PM EDT

Oh, POAD, you frigging moron. - (CRConrad) - May 31, 2004, 03:47:31 AM EDT

You are totally wrong there, Box. (What else is new? :-) -NT - (CRConrad) - (2) - May 31, 2004, 03:44:47 AM EDT

after reading you reply to Imric on why you joined in - (boxley) - (1) - May 31, 2004, 10:38:54 AM EDT

Sure there is - (deSitter) - May 31, 2004, 11:01:37 AM EDT

Re: And how many males have - (deSitter) - (3) - May 30, 2004, 04:13:58 AM EDT

Top-notch! - (Ashton) - May 30, 2004, 05:29:10 AM EDT

Wow, an anagram! I guess that proves it then. ;) -NT - (FuManChu) - (1) - May 30, 2004, 02:08:01 PM EDT

There is no doubt - (deSitter) - May 30, 2004, 02:58:38 PM EDT

So then..EEZ-availability is entirely Irrelevant.___ I see. -NT - (Ashton) - (54) - May 28, 2004, 04:55:36 PM EDT

Yes. Coincidental. -NT - (imric) - (53) - May 29, 2004, 08:11:07 AM EDT

"Coincidence"??? Bullpucky! - (CRConrad) - (52) - May 29, 2004, 06:49:24 PM EDT

Ill start worrying when my chance of dying by a bullet - (boxley) - (2) - May 29, 2004, 06:53:05 PM EDT

That's silly. - (pwhysall) - (1) - May 30, 2004, 04:12:29 AM EDT

ROFL! I wont reduce my risk of puking blood in my own fat - (boxley) - May 30, 2004, 11:33:25 AM EDT

Re: "Coincidence"??? Bullpucky! - (admin) - (13) - May 29, 2004, 06:58:06 PM EDT

Yeah, possible, but I think that's discounted for already. - (CRConrad) - (2) - May 29, 2004, 07:04:01 PM EDT

Either way... - (admin) - (1) - May 29, 2004, 07:11:11 PM EDT

What do you mean by "problem"? - (CRConrad) - May 30, 2004, 06:19:00 PM EDT

Nod. - (imric) - (1) - May 29, 2004, 08:30:34 PM EDT

Pure Boolean. Again. - (Ashton) - May 30, 2004, 06:04:17 AM EDT

Oakland calling - (rcareaga) - (7) - May 30, 2004, 11:27:01 AM EDT

just be glad they are not using grenades or suicide bombers - (boxley) - (6) - May 30, 2004, 11:35:56 AM EDT

Whatever, Box. - (pwhysall) - (4) - May 30, 2004, 11:39:09 AM EDT

gee the guy that does that is - (boxley) - (3) - May 30, 2004, 11:41:14 AM EDT

I'd say that's part of the problem. - (inthane-chan) - (2) - May 30, 2004, 08:12:33 PM EDT

Um, I must pick that nit. - (Another Scott) - (1) - May 30, 2004, 08:38:11 PM EDT

No argument there. - (inthane-chan) - May 30, 2004, 09:05:22 PM EDT

Private ownership of guns banned in Chicago - (lincoln) - May 30, 2004, 08:33:17 PM EDT

Guns are not a cause. - (imric) - (34) - May 29, 2004, 08:29:31 PM EDT

Computers were designed for things other than virus creation - (Meerkat) - (27) - May 29, 2004, 08:45:16 PM EDT

'stuff'? - (imric) - (26) - May 29, 2004, 09:07:28 PM EDT

Completely not the point I was trying to get across. - (Meerkat) - (25) - May 29, 2004, 09:37:53 PM EDT

Missing mine. - (imric) - (24) - May 29, 2004, 09:43:40 PM EDT

Guns like computers are tools - (orion) - (23) - May 30, 2004, 01:13:01 AM EDT

Re: Guns like computers are tools - (pwhysall) - (22) - May 30, 2004, 04:03:00 AM EDT

You note the futility, but ... - (Another Scott) - (21) - May 30, 2004, 12:37:52 PM EDT

Militias != army !=police - (imric) - (20) - May 30, 2004, 03:01:44 PM EDT

I can't help it. - (mmoffitt) - (19) - May 31, 2004, 03:50:47 PM EDT

larn yersel history - (boxley) - (4) - May 31, 2004, 04:35:51 PM EDT

You want to check those dates again? - (mmoffitt) - (3) - May 31, 2004, 08:04:31 PM EDT

absolute bull puckey from a man who grew up in NC - (boxley) - (2) - May 31, 2004, 11:27:57 PM EDT

That we would owe to... - (mmoffitt) - (1) - June 1, 2004, 11:24:00 AM EDT

Somewhat OT: a single Frenchman - (admin) - June 1, 2004, 04:43:40 PM EDT

Sorry. Wrong. - (imric) - (13) - May 31, 2004, 07:36:51 PM EDT

Guess again. - (mmoffitt) - (11) - May 31, 2004, 08:09:23 PM EDT

Yeah, and what other 'perversions' have occured via SC? - (imric) - (10) - May 31, 2004, 08:47:29 PM EDT

Who said anything about the Army? - (mmoffitt) - (9) - May 31, 2004, 11:11:32 PM EDT

Compare 2nd Amendment to VA Bill of Rights from 6/12/1776 - (Another Scott) - (1) - May 31, 2004, 11:29:04 PM EDT

interesting - (jake123) - June 1, 2004, 01:20:17 PM EDT

So according to you the supreme court is never wrong? - (boxley) - May 31, 2004, 11:29:53 PM EDT

Militia - (bepatient) - (5) - May 31, 2004, 11:30:25 PM EDT

Did *you* understand the *original* definition? - (CRConrad) - (4) - June 1, 2004, 04:31:57 AM EDT

Nice try, but.. - (Ashton) - June 1, 2004, 06:03:54 AM EDT

No. - (imric) - (1) - June 1, 2004, 06:27:08 AM EDT

that is a very good point - (SpiceWare) - June 1, 2004, 09:50:31 AM EDT

Wanna read what started it? - (bepatient) - June 1, 2004, 02:24:35 PM EDT

Then.. in a Document renowned for its blinding clarity, - (Ashton) - May 31, 2004, 08:14:34 PM EDT

Re: Guns are not a cause. - (pwhysall) - (1) - May 30, 2004, 04:11:04 AM EDT

yes they both should be legal and cheap - (boxley) - May 30, 2004, 11:39:04 AM EDT

They don't have to be. Are you denying they are a means? - (CRConrad) - (3) - May 30, 2004, 06:24:58 PM EDT

Patriots. I understand him perfectly. - (deSitter) - (2) - May 30, 2004, 06:28:04 PM EDT

Aye. -NT - (imric) - May 30, 2004, 07:08:11 PM EDT

Yeah, yeah. All noble sentiments... - (CRConrad) - May 31, 2004, 03:41:28 AM EDT

Sheep. Hmm.
199 ms