Sorry, BeeP, but you're wrong on both counts.
Instead, Wade, I'm assuming in the interest of showing you that Imric was indeed correct, posted the reference.Nope.
As Brandi said a few posts up, *he*, Brandioch, had posted links to other explanations long before Wade did.
Becuase you failed...to >force< Imric to do your research.And since, as Brandioch -- AFAIK, correctly -- pointed out, the whole dancing-around-the-name thingy is more an Old-Jewish than a Christian-Bible thing, Imric should very well have been able to refute him by just posting one of those links, or some version of the infamous four-letter abbreviation -- which apparently wasn't taboo either for the Old-Jews or the Bible-Christians! -- itself.
Why Imric didn't do that, we'll never know unless he tells us... But there again, Brandioch is right and you are wrong: Brandioch made a claim; Imric said "Not so!", and DID NOT support that counter-claim. But that was Imric's job, not Brandioch's; elementary logic and debating.
Its amazing...that you claim victory in a thread because of right shift...right shift that >you< created by not admitting that others were correct.And this is why *I* so often get annoyed with *you*: Not only do you blame Brandioch for the right-shift created by Imric, but then you have the GALL to dance around and be "funny" in this ridiculous way -- which WOULD be quite funny, if only you were RIGHT, but you aren't! -- the NERVE to gibber condescendingly at someone who, under the circumstances, would be more entitled to be condescending to *you*. That's annoying as all Hell; you just don't have any *right* to crow here, because you HAVE NOTHING to crow *about*.
Thats why I love you.
*smooch*
Fuck knows why you engage in this "debating" (to abuse the term) style only with Brandioch, but it certainly makes one understand, at least a little, why he calls you "mr. Pathetic".
Since you don't do that to anybody else, please stop doing it to Brandioch too.
