IWETHEY v. 0.3.0
|
TODO
1,095 registered users | 0
active users
| 0 LpH |
Statistics
Login
|
Create New User
Welcome to IWETHEY!
IWETHEY Home
/
IWETHEY Board
/
Politics Forum
/
Prec\ufffdsamente - that would be a 100% Murican cop-out.
Post #287,965
by
Ashton
6/27/07 5:01:56 PM
Reply
Prec\ufffdsamente - that would be a 100% Murican cop-out.
I hate it when they're right
- (
andread
)
- (56)
- June 25, 2007, 12:44:03 PM EDT
"Money talks!"
-NT
- (
a6l6e6x
)
- June 25, 2007, 01:21:44 PM EDT
What makes them right?
- (
Seamus
)
- (45)
- June 25, 2007, 10:07:11 PM EDT
mass speech is free, commercial is not
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- June 26, 2007, 07:23:10 AM EDT
Re: What makes them right?
- (
andread
)
- (40)
- June 26, 2007, 08:47:55 AM EDT
In the real world, it doesn't really work that way
- (
jake123
)
- (14)
- June 26, 2007, 08:53:11 AM EDT
Re: In the real world, it doesn't really work that way
- (
andread
)
- (13)
- June 26, 2007, 12:12:57 PM EDT
The problem as I see it is this:
- (
hnick
)
- (10)
- June 26, 2007, 12:42:23 PM EDT
Nice theory :-)
-NT
- (
bepatient
)
- (8)
- June 26, 2007, 01:48:56 PM EDT
What part?
- (
jb4
)
- (7)
- June 27, 2007, 10:16:34 AM EDT
Re: What part?
- (
bepatient
)
- (6)
- June 27, 2007, 11:10:23 AM EDT
Not sure it was really ever a theory...
- (
jb4
)
- (5)
- June 27, 2007, 08:56:25 PM EDT
Lofty ideal perhaps?
-NT
- (
bepatient
)
- June 27, 2007, 11:29:14 PM EDT
Ok, so it's a joke these days.
- (
hnick
)
- (3)
- June 28, 2007, 06:55:10 AM EDT
land of the safe home of the whiners?
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- (2)
- June 28, 2007, 09:09:34 AM EDT
Better, but I'd likely be more caustic.
-NT
- (
hnick
)
- (1)
- June 28, 2007, 09:20:00 AM EDT
Land of the somnolent shopping sheep?
- (
Ashton
)
- June 28, 2007, 10:00:24 PM EDT
Money tilt
- (
tablizer
)
- July 2, 2007, 12:32:51 AM EDT
So the well heeled should be alowed to drown out . . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (1)
- June 26, 2007, 01:50:30 PM EDT
you are either a mass movement that can collectively
- (
boxley
)
- June 26, 2007, 03:50:24 PM EDT
Anyone can be heard
- (
Seamus
)
- (24)
- June 26, 2007, 07:08:47 PM EDT
wrong conclusion
- (
boxley
)
- (23)
- June 26, 2007, 08:04:44 PM EDT
I disagree
- (
Seamus
)
- (22)
- June 26, 2007, 08:31:31 PM EDT
School property is not the issue
- (
crazy
)
- (16)
- June 26, 2007, 08:47:10 PM EDT
No it is not the issue
- (
Seamus
)
- (13)
- June 26, 2007, 08:50:29 PM EDT
its the CENTRAL ISSUE to the ruling sheesh
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- (12)
- June 26, 2007, 08:51:47 PM EDT
It was the intent to promote drug use
- (
Seamus
)
- (11)
- June 26, 2007, 09:16:41 PM EDT
splutter!
- (
boxley
)
- (10)
- June 26, 2007, 09:31:35 PM EDT
Are you really this dense?
- (
Seamus
)
- (9)
- June 27, 2007, 05:28:16 AM EDT
Re: Are you really this dense?
- (
bepatient
)
- (7)
- June 27, 2007, 07:03:48 AM EDT
What was that about "it's a free country", again?
-NT
- (
CRConrad
)
- (6)
- June 27, 2007, 08:06:35 AM EDT
Couple of issues with this
- (
bepatient
)
- (5)
- June 27, 2007, 11:14:29 AM EDT
Dude, not only is 18 over the "age of consent"
- (
jb4
)
- (4)
- June 27, 2007, 08:58:13 PM EDT
Ask it another way
- (
bepatient
)
- (3)
- June 27, 2007, 11:41:43 PM EDT
Begs the question of his Majority
- (
Ashton
)
- (2)
- June 28, 2007, 05:23:27 AM EDT
This is a litmus decision?
- (
bepatient
)
- (1)
- June 28, 2007, 08:25:13 AM EDT
Litmus only in the sense that -
- (
Ashton
)
- June 28, 2007, 09:45:57 PM EDT
Im not the one who cant understand the basis of the case
- (
boxley
)
- June 27, 2007, 09:09:08 AM EDT
Re: School property is not the issue
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- (1)
- June 27, 2007, 10:14:47 AM EDT
Prec\ufffdsamente - that would be a 100% Murican cop-out.
-NT
- (
Ashton
)
- June 27, 2007, 05:01:56 PM EDT
so all for censorship I see, no free speech allowed
- (
boxley
)
- (4)
- June 26, 2007, 08:51:02 PM EDT
It is all about intent
- (
Seamus
)
- (3)
- June 26, 2007, 09:33:36 PM EDT
speech from non commercial groups CANNOT be regulated
- (
boxley
)
- (2)
- June 26, 2007, 09:43:01 PM EDT
Let me be clearer
- (
Seamus
)
- (1)
- June 27, 2007, 05:35:02 AM EDT
I have not seen the ad, what in detail was the content
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- June 27, 2007, 09:10:25 AM EDT
I'm ambivalent.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (1)
- June 26, 2007, 09:50:18 AM EDT
Between Washington and Franklin,
- (
Ashton
)
- June 26, 2007, 06:20:45 PM EDT
Remember, according to a previous ruling, money == speech
-NT
- (
jb4
)
- June 27, 2007, 09:29:50 AM EDT
What the week's rulings taught us.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (7)
- June 27, 2007, 01:04:41 PM EDT
Yes, just that Simple. 5-to-4s ... til the 'revolution'.
-NT
- (
Ashton
)
- June 27, 2007, 05:05:08 PM EDT
Re: What the week's rulings taught us.
- (
andread
)
- (3)
- June 27, 2007, 05:05:35 PM EDT
Depends on exactly what is meant by "corporate"
- (
jake123
)
- June 28, 2007, 08:54:12 AM EDT
Heh.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (1)
- June 28, 2007, 10:04:49 AM EDT
It's a fine line between naive wishfulness and gullibility.
- (
Ashton
)
- June 28, 2007, 10:13:57 PM EDT
There's still a bit of hope...
- (
scoenye
)
- (1)
- June 29, 2007, 01:41:11 PM EDT
:-) .. a few truffles amidst the turds, anyway
-NT
- (
Ashton
)
- June 29, 2007, 03:59:56 PM EDT
Re: I hate it when they're right-eously dissembling
- (
Ashton
)
- June 29, 2007, 09:06:07 PM EDT
i
we
they
.org
Using this formulation, the cat can be dead and deader.
109 ms