IWETHEY v. 0.3.0
|
TODO
1,095 registered users | 0
active users
| 0 LpH |
Statistics
Login
|
Create New User
Welcome to IWETHEY!
IWETHEY Home
/
IWETHEY Board
/
Politics Forum
/
Money tilt
Post #288,149
by
tablizer
7/2/07 12:32:51 AM
Reply
Money tilt
If corporations can buy the airwaves, then the political messages will be tilted toward pro-business ideas because they have the most access.
________________
oop.ismad.com
I hate it when they're right
- (
andread
)
- (56)
- June 25, 2007, 12:44:03 PM EDT
"Money talks!"
-NT
- (
a6l6e6x
)
- June 25, 2007, 01:21:44 PM EDT
What makes them right?
- (
Seamus
)
- (45)
- June 25, 2007, 10:07:11 PM EDT
mass speech is free, commercial is not
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- June 26, 2007, 07:23:10 AM EDT
Re: What makes them right?
- (
andread
)
- (40)
- June 26, 2007, 08:47:55 AM EDT
In the real world, it doesn't really work that way
- (
jake123
)
- (14)
- June 26, 2007, 08:53:11 AM EDT
Re: In the real world, it doesn't really work that way
- (
andread
)
- (13)
- June 26, 2007, 12:12:57 PM EDT
The problem as I see it is this:
- (
hnick
)
- (10)
- June 26, 2007, 12:42:23 PM EDT
Nice theory :-)
-NT
- (
bepatient
)
- (8)
- June 26, 2007, 01:48:56 PM EDT
What part?
- (
jb4
)
- (7)
- June 27, 2007, 10:16:34 AM EDT
Re: What part?
- (
bepatient
)
- (6)
- June 27, 2007, 11:10:23 AM EDT
Not sure it was really ever a theory...
- (
jb4
)
- (5)
- June 27, 2007, 08:56:25 PM EDT
Lofty ideal perhaps?
-NT
- (
bepatient
)
- June 27, 2007, 11:29:14 PM EDT
Ok, so it's a joke these days.
- (
hnick
)
- (3)
- June 28, 2007, 06:55:10 AM EDT
land of the safe home of the whiners?
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- (2)
- June 28, 2007, 09:09:34 AM EDT
Better, but I'd likely be more caustic.
-NT
- (
hnick
)
- (1)
- June 28, 2007, 09:20:00 AM EDT
Land of the somnolent shopping sheep?
- (
Ashton
)
- June 28, 2007, 10:00:24 PM EDT
Money tilt
- (
tablizer
)
- July 2, 2007, 12:32:51 AM EDT
So the well heeled should be alowed to drown out . . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (1)
- June 26, 2007, 01:50:30 PM EDT
you are either a mass movement that can collectively
- (
boxley
)
- June 26, 2007, 03:50:24 PM EDT
Anyone can be heard
- (
Seamus
)
- (24)
- June 26, 2007, 07:08:47 PM EDT
wrong conclusion
- (
boxley
)
- (23)
- June 26, 2007, 08:04:44 PM EDT
I disagree
- (
Seamus
)
- (22)
- June 26, 2007, 08:31:31 PM EDT
School property is not the issue
- (
crazy
)
- (16)
- June 26, 2007, 08:47:10 PM EDT
No it is not the issue
- (
Seamus
)
- (13)
- June 26, 2007, 08:50:29 PM EDT
its the CENTRAL ISSUE to the ruling sheesh
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- (12)
- June 26, 2007, 08:51:47 PM EDT
It was the intent to promote drug use
- (
Seamus
)
- (11)
- June 26, 2007, 09:16:41 PM EDT
splutter!
- (
boxley
)
- (10)
- June 26, 2007, 09:31:35 PM EDT
Are you really this dense?
- (
Seamus
)
- (9)
- June 27, 2007, 05:28:16 AM EDT
Re: Are you really this dense?
- (
bepatient
)
- (7)
- June 27, 2007, 07:03:48 AM EDT
What was that about "it's a free country", again?
-NT
- (
CRConrad
)
- (6)
- June 27, 2007, 08:06:35 AM EDT
Couple of issues with this
- (
bepatient
)
- (5)
- June 27, 2007, 11:14:29 AM EDT
Dude, not only is 18 over the "age of consent"
- (
jb4
)
- (4)
- June 27, 2007, 08:58:13 PM EDT
Ask it another way
- (
bepatient
)
- (3)
- June 27, 2007, 11:41:43 PM EDT
Begs the question of his Majority
- (
Ashton
)
- (2)
- June 28, 2007, 05:23:27 AM EDT
This is a litmus decision?
- (
bepatient
)
- (1)
- June 28, 2007, 08:25:13 AM EDT
Litmus only in the sense that -
- (
Ashton
)
- June 28, 2007, 09:45:57 PM EDT
Im not the one who cant understand the basis of the case
- (
boxley
)
- June 27, 2007, 09:09:08 AM EDT
Re: School property is not the issue
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- (1)
- June 27, 2007, 10:14:47 AM EDT
Prec\ufffdsamente - that would be a 100% Murican cop-out.
-NT
- (
Ashton
)
- June 27, 2007, 05:01:56 PM EDT
so all for censorship I see, no free speech allowed
- (
boxley
)
- (4)
- June 26, 2007, 08:51:02 PM EDT
It is all about intent
- (
Seamus
)
- (3)
- June 26, 2007, 09:33:36 PM EDT
speech from non commercial groups CANNOT be regulated
- (
boxley
)
- (2)
- June 26, 2007, 09:43:01 PM EDT
Let me be clearer
- (
Seamus
)
- (1)
- June 27, 2007, 05:35:02 AM EDT
I have not seen the ad, what in detail was the content
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- June 27, 2007, 09:10:25 AM EDT
I'm ambivalent.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (1)
- June 26, 2007, 09:50:18 AM EDT
Between Washington and Franklin,
- (
Ashton
)
- June 26, 2007, 06:20:45 PM EDT
Remember, according to a previous ruling, money == speech
-NT
- (
jb4
)
- June 27, 2007, 09:29:50 AM EDT
What the week's rulings taught us.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (7)
- June 27, 2007, 01:04:41 PM EDT
Yes, just that Simple. 5-to-4s ... til the 'revolution'.
-NT
- (
Ashton
)
- June 27, 2007, 05:05:08 PM EDT
Re: What the week's rulings taught us.
- (
andread
)
- (3)
- June 27, 2007, 05:05:35 PM EDT
Depends on exactly what is meant by "corporate"
- (
jake123
)
- June 28, 2007, 08:54:12 AM EDT
Heh.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (1)
- June 28, 2007, 10:04:49 AM EDT
It's a fine line between naive wishfulness and gullibility.
- (
Ashton
)
- June 28, 2007, 10:13:57 PM EDT
There's still a bit of hope...
- (
scoenye
)
- (1)
- June 29, 2007, 01:41:11 PM EDT
:-) .. a few truffles amidst the turds, anyway
-NT
- (
Ashton
)
- June 29, 2007, 03:59:56 PM EDT
Re: I hate it when they're right-eously dissembling
- (
Ashton
)
- June 29, 2007, 09:06:07 PM EDT
i
we
they
.org
If the people speak and the king doesn't listen, there is something wrong with the king. If the king acts precipitously and the people say nothing, something is wrong with the people.
563 ms