IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Politics Forum / mass speech is free, commercial is not
Post #287,843
by boxley
6/26/07 7:23:10 AM
Reply
New mass speech is free, commercial is not
Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 51 years. meep

reach me at [link|mailto:bill.oxley@cox.net|mailto:bill.oxley@cox.net]
     I hate it when they're right - (andread) - (56) - June 25, 2007, 12:44:03 PM EDT
         "Money talks!" -NT - (a6l6e6x) - June 25, 2007, 01:21:44 PM EDT
         What makes them right? - (Seamus) - (45) - June 25, 2007, 10:07:11 PM EDT
             mass speech is free, commercial is not -NT - (boxley) - June 26, 2007, 07:23:10 AM EDT
             Re: What makes them right? - (andread) - (40) - June 26, 2007, 08:47:55 AM EDT
                 In the real world, it doesn't really work that way - (jake123) - (14) - June 26, 2007, 08:53:11 AM EDT
                     Re: In the real world, it doesn't really work that way - (andread) - (13) - June 26, 2007, 12:12:57 PM EDT
                         The problem as I see it is this: - (hnick) - (10) - June 26, 2007, 12:42:23 PM EDT
                             Nice theory :-) -NT - (bepatient) - (8) - June 26, 2007, 01:48:56 PM EDT
                                 What part? - (jb4) - (7) - June 27, 2007, 10:16:34 AM EDT
                                     Re: What part? - (bepatient) - (6) - June 27, 2007, 11:10:23 AM EDT
                                         Not sure it was really ever a theory... - (jb4) - (5) - June 27, 2007, 08:56:25 PM EDT
                                             Lofty ideal perhaps? -NT - (bepatient) - June 27, 2007, 11:29:14 PM EDT
                                             Ok, so it's a joke these days. - (hnick) - (3) - June 28, 2007, 06:55:10 AM EDT
                                                 land of the safe home of the whiners? -NT - (boxley) - (2) - June 28, 2007, 09:09:34 AM EDT
                                                     Better, but I'd likely be more caustic. -NT - (hnick) - (1) - June 28, 2007, 09:20:00 AM EDT
                                                         Land of the somnolent shopping sheep? - (Ashton) - June 28, 2007, 10:00:24 PM EDT
                             Money tilt - (tablizer) - July 2, 2007, 12:32:51 AM EDT
                         So the well heeled should be alowed to drown out . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - June 26, 2007, 01:50:30 PM EDT
                             you are either a mass movement that can collectively - (boxley) - June 26, 2007, 03:50:24 PM EDT
                 Anyone can be heard - (Seamus) - (24) - June 26, 2007, 07:08:47 PM EDT
                     wrong conclusion - (boxley) - (23) - June 26, 2007, 08:04:44 PM EDT
                         I disagree - (Seamus) - (22) - June 26, 2007, 08:31:31 PM EDT
                             School property is not the issue - (crazy) - (16) - June 26, 2007, 08:47:10 PM EDT
                                 No it is not the issue - (Seamus) - (13) - June 26, 2007, 08:50:29 PM EDT
                                     its the CENTRAL ISSUE to the ruling sheesh -NT - (boxley) - (12) - June 26, 2007, 08:51:47 PM EDT
                                         It was the intent to promote drug use - (Seamus) - (11) - June 26, 2007, 09:16:41 PM EDT
                                             splutter! - (boxley) - (10) - June 26, 2007, 09:31:35 PM EDT
                                                 Are you really this dense? - (Seamus) - (9) - June 27, 2007, 05:28:16 AM EDT
                                                     Re: Are you really this dense? - (bepatient) - (7) - June 27, 2007, 07:03:48 AM EDT
                                                         What was that about "it's a free country", again? -NT - (CRConrad) - (6) - June 27, 2007, 08:06:35 AM EDT
                                                             Couple of issues with this - (bepatient) - (5) - June 27, 2007, 11:14:29 AM EDT
                                                                 Dude, not only is 18 over the "age of consent" - (jb4) - (4) - June 27, 2007, 08:58:13 PM EDT
                                                                     Ask it another way - (bepatient) - (3) - June 27, 2007, 11:41:43 PM EDT
                                                                         Begs the question of his Majority - (Ashton) - (2) - June 28, 2007, 05:23:27 AM EDT
                                                                             This is a litmus decision? - (bepatient) - (1) - June 28, 2007, 08:25:13 AM EDT
                                                                                 Litmus only in the sense that - - (Ashton) - June 28, 2007, 09:45:57 PM EDT
                                                     Im not the one who cant understand the basis of the case - (boxley) - June 27, 2007, 09:09:08 AM EDT
                                 Re: School property is not the issue - (JayMehaffey) - (1) - June 27, 2007, 10:14:47 AM EDT
                                     Prec\ufffdsamente - that would be a 100% Murican cop-out. -NT - (Ashton) - June 27, 2007, 05:01:56 PM EDT
                             so all for censorship I see, no free speech allowed - (boxley) - (4) - June 26, 2007, 08:51:02 PM EDT
                                 It is all about intent - (Seamus) - (3) - June 26, 2007, 09:33:36 PM EDT
                                     speech from non commercial groups CANNOT be regulated - (boxley) - (2) - June 26, 2007, 09:43:01 PM EDT
                                         Let me be clearer - (Seamus) - (1) - June 27, 2007, 05:35:02 AM EDT
                                             I have not seen the ad, what in detail was the content -NT - (boxley) - June 27, 2007, 09:10:25 AM EDT
             I'm ambivalent. - (Another Scott) - (1) - June 26, 2007, 09:50:18 AM EDT
                 Between Washington and Franklin, - (Ashton) - June 26, 2007, 06:20:45 PM EDT
             Remember, according to a previous ruling, money == speech -NT - (jb4) - June 27, 2007, 09:29:50 AM EDT
         What the week's rulings taught us. - (mmoffitt) - (7) - June 27, 2007, 01:04:41 PM EDT
             Yes, just that Simple. 5-to-4s ... til the 'revolution'. -NT - (Ashton) - June 27, 2007, 05:05:08 PM EDT
             Re: What the week's rulings taught us. - (andread) - (3) - June 27, 2007, 05:05:35 PM EDT
                 Depends on exactly what is meant by "corporate" - (jake123) - June 28, 2007, 08:54:12 AM EDT
                 Heh. - (mmoffitt) - (1) - June 28, 2007, 10:04:49 AM EDT
                     It's a fine line between naive wishfulness and gullibility. - (Ashton) - June 28, 2007, 10:13:57 PM EDT
             There's still a bit of hope... - (scoenye) - (1) - June 29, 2007, 01:41:11 PM EDT
                 :-) .. a few truffles amidst the turds, anyway -NT - (Ashton) - June 29, 2007, 03:59:56 PM EDT
         Re: I hate it when they're right-eously dissembling - (Ashton) - June 29, 2007, 09:06:07 PM EDT

iwethey.org
Nobody can spell “fuchsia”.
147 ms