IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Religion, Philosophy, Metaphysics Forum / why not? you all have been affeared of 666 for centuries
Post #286,958
by boxley
6/13/07 10:08:49 AM
Reply
New why not? you all have been affeared of 666 for centuries
twas a flic of a quil that turned it from 639
thanx,
bill
Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 51 years. meep

reach me at [link|mailto:bill.oxley@cox.net|mailto:bill.oxley@cox.net]
Post #286,959
by jb4
Picture of jb4
6/13/07 10:13:32 AM
Reply
New I always thought it was simply a badly drawn 555...
jb4
"It's hard for me, you know, living in this beautiful White House, to give you a firsthand assessment."
— George W. Bush, when asked if he believed Iraq was in a state of civil war (Newsweek, 26 Feb 07)
Post #286,978
by Ashton
6/13/07 5:48:53 PM
Reply
New Exactly: how we got 555-1212; what they meant was
Post #286,983
by Seamus
6/13/07 6:26:55 PM
Reply
New 616 not 666
Many scholars believe that 666 won out because it is derived from a more complex formula and also because it's simply more catchy. "Six hundred sixty-six looks like a more memorable number than 616," said David Parker, a New Testament professor at the University of Birmingham in England. "Six hundred sixty-six steadily took over, and the alternative was forgotten until modern scholars in the past 200 years started to look at more manuscripts and to find ones that had been lost.


[link|http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1501490/20050509/index.jhtml|link] 
Seamus
     if we are going to get all technical about it - (boxley) - (26) - June 10, 2007, 06:17:56 PM EDT
         Just another reason I'll burn in hell! :) -NT - (a6l6e6x) - June 10, 2007, 06:21:38 PM EDT
         Another obsolete law? - (warmachine) - (24) - June 10, 2007, 08:13:50 PM EDT
             think about it, from a public health issue - (boxley) - (16) - June 10, 2007, 09:45:38 PM EDT
                 Still obsolete - (warmachine) - (15) - June 11, 2007, 08:37:35 AM EDT
                     Oh I don't know if it's that harsh - (jake123) - June 11, 2007, 08:44:20 AM EDT
                     apparently you havnt kept up with the news reports - (boxley) - (13) - June 11, 2007, 09:03:38 AM EDT
                         So, Deuteronomy 14:10 has been officially changed? - (warmachine) - (12) - June 11, 2007, 11:32:24 AM EDT
                             so, are you a practicing Jew? - (boxley) - (11) - June 11, 2007, 11:38:49 AM EDT
                                 Interesting - (warmachine) - (10) - June 11, 2007, 11:59:35 AM EDT
                                     smoking is not permitted in public in many states - (boxley) - (6) - June 11, 2007, 12:09:42 PM EDT
                                         Not helpful - (warmachine) - (5) - June 11, 2007, 04:36:26 PM EDT
                                             again point=missed - (boxley) - (4) - June 11, 2007, 05:10:17 PM EDT
                                                 What about other weird stuff? - (warmachine) - (2) - June 11, 2007, 06:05:28 PM EDT
                                                     Without the link to the OT - (Seamus) - June 11, 2007, 07:18:52 PM EDT
                                                     since slavery was widely practiced until fairly recently - (boxley) - June 11, 2007, 08:45:13 PM EDT
                                                 A demoted Old Testament? (new thread) - (warmachine) - June 16, 2007, 06:31:36 AM EDT
                                     I'm not saying it's theologically sound... - (ubernostrum) - (2) - June 12, 2007, 01:13:18 AM EDT
                                         That brings up a point. - (static) - (1) - June 12, 2007, 11:13:22 PM EDT
                                             Yes, Christianity as normally formulated . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - June 12, 2007, 11:59:55 PM EDT
             How can you "fix" the Unaltered Word Of Gawd... - (jb4) - (6) - June 13, 2007, 09:50:05 AM EDT
                 why not? you all have been affeared of 666 for centuries - (boxley) - (3) - June 13, 2007, 10:08:49 AM EDT
                     I always thought it was simply a badly drawn 555... -NT - (jb4) - (1) - June 13, 2007, 10:13:32 AM EDT
                         Exactly: how we got 555-1212; what they meant was -NT - (Ashton) - June 13, 2007, 05:48:53 PM EDT
                     616 not 666 - (Seamus) - June 13, 2007, 06:26:55 PM EDT
                 Delegation - (warmachine) - (1) - June 16, 2007, 06:44:43 AM EDT
                     OmiGawd.. what. if. - (Ashton) - June 16, 2007, 04:37:48 PM EDT

Better graphics than the Amiga!
58 ms