IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Religion, Philosophy, Metaphysics Forum / That brings up a point.
Post #286,923
by static
6/12/07 11:13:22 PM
Reply
New That brings up a point.
The modern Christian church is largely a product of taking Paul's side when he and Peter clashed about how much of the Jewish Law applied to these new-fangled 'Christians'. Paul's general approach was that the minutae of practising it largely did not apply. If you ever encounter any, Jews that call themselves Messianic Jews are based on Peter's side. They follow the Judaistic law, but they also recognise Jesus as the Messiah, so they're Christians, too.

Wade.

Is it enough to love
Is it enough to breathe
Somebody rip my heart out
And leave me here to bleed
 
Is it enough to die
Somebody save my life
I'd rather be Anything but Ordinary
Please



-- "Anything but Ordinary" by Avril Lavigne.

· my ·
· [link|http://staticsan.livejournal.com/|blog] ·
· [link|http://yceran.org/|website] ·
Post #286,927
by Andrew Grygus
Picture of Andrew Grygus
6/12/07 11:59:55 PM
Reply
New Yes, Christianity as normally formulated . . .
. . is not so much an offshoot of Judaism as it is a sub-cult of the Pagans (var. cult of the dying god). It's a pastiche of what was going on at the time: the cult of Isis and Osiris, the Krishna cult, possibly Buddhism and most particularly Mithraism (the mystery religion of the Roman Legions). Much of the Judaism (adoption of the Old Testament, etc.) is sort of added on later to support the authority of the church.

There is no reason whatever for a Christian to follow Jewish dietary law. In any case, much of that appears to have been concocted to make Jews "different" to keep them from fading into the populations of city folks.

The error of Christianity is not its content but to proclaim itself the whole story and deny all else when it is actually just a sub-cult.
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
     if we are going to get all technical about it - (boxley) - (26) - June 10, 2007, 06:17:56 PM EDT
         Just another reason I'll burn in hell! :) -NT - (a6l6e6x) - June 10, 2007, 06:21:38 PM EDT
         Another obsolete law? - (warmachine) - (24) - June 10, 2007, 08:13:50 PM EDT
             think about it, from a public health issue - (boxley) - (16) - June 10, 2007, 09:45:38 PM EDT
                 Still obsolete - (warmachine) - (15) - June 11, 2007, 08:37:35 AM EDT
                     Oh I don't know if it's that harsh - (jake123) - June 11, 2007, 08:44:20 AM EDT
                     apparently you havnt kept up with the news reports - (boxley) - (13) - June 11, 2007, 09:03:38 AM EDT
                         So, Deuteronomy 14:10 has been officially changed? - (warmachine) - (12) - June 11, 2007, 11:32:24 AM EDT
                             so, are you a practicing Jew? - (boxley) - (11) - June 11, 2007, 11:38:49 AM EDT
                                 Interesting - (warmachine) - (10) - June 11, 2007, 11:59:35 AM EDT
                                     smoking is not permitted in public in many states - (boxley) - (6) - June 11, 2007, 12:09:42 PM EDT
                                         Not helpful - (warmachine) - (5) - June 11, 2007, 04:36:26 PM EDT
                                             again point=missed - (boxley) - (4) - June 11, 2007, 05:10:17 PM EDT
                                                 What about other weird stuff? - (warmachine) - (2) - June 11, 2007, 06:05:28 PM EDT
                                                     Without the link to the OT - (Seamus) - June 11, 2007, 07:18:52 PM EDT
                                                     since slavery was widely practiced until fairly recently - (boxley) - June 11, 2007, 08:45:13 PM EDT
                                                 A demoted Old Testament? (new thread) - (warmachine) - June 16, 2007, 06:31:36 AM EDT
                                     I'm not saying it's theologically sound... - (ubernostrum) - (2) - June 12, 2007, 01:13:18 AM EDT
                                         That brings up a point. - (static) - (1) - June 12, 2007, 11:13:22 PM EDT
                                             Yes, Christianity as normally formulated . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - June 12, 2007, 11:59:55 PM EDT
             How can you "fix" the Unaltered Word Of Gawd... - (jb4) - (6) - June 13, 2007, 09:50:05 AM EDT
                 why not? you all have been affeared of 666 for centuries - (boxley) - (3) - June 13, 2007, 10:08:49 AM EDT
                     I always thought it was simply a badly drawn 555... -NT - (jb4) - (1) - June 13, 2007, 10:13:32 AM EDT
                         Exactly: how we got 555-1212; what they meant was -NT - (Ashton) - June 13, 2007, 05:48:53 PM EDT
                     616 not 666 - (Seamus) - June 13, 2007, 06:26:55 PM EDT
                 Delegation - (warmachine) - (1) - June 16, 2007, 06:44:43 AM EDT
                     OmiGawd.. what. if. - (Ashton) - June 16, 2007, 04:37:48 PM EDT

Oh my God! They killed Kenny!
79 ms