IWETHEY v. 0.3.0
|
TODO
1,095 registered users | 0
active users
| 0 LpH |
Statistics
Login
|
Create New User
Welcome to IWETHEY!
IWETHEY Home
/
IWETHEY Board
/
Religion, Philosophy, Metaphysics Forum
/
Concur.
Post #134,565
by
mmoffitt
1/9/04 3:10:51 PM
Reply
Concur.
bcnu,
Mikem
I don't do third world languages. So no, I don't do Java.
I won't walk on coals about that
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (183)
- Jan. 3, 2004, 06:59:07 PM EST
Science and Religion meet here
- (
orion
)
- (116)
- Jan. 3, 2004, 07:49:01 PM EST
There is a Christian anti everything else . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (6)
- Jan. 3, 2004, 08:44:54 PM EST
Not every Christian is a fundamentalist
- (
orion
)
- (5)
- Jan. 3, 2004, 09:34:05 PM EST
Re: Not every Christian is a fundamentalist
- (
deSitter
)
- (4)
- Jan. 3, 2004, 09:32:13 PM EST
Amen, brother-- and with holy vestments and 'blessed' oil..
-NT
- (
Ashton
)
- Jan. 4, 2004, 05:54:22 AM EST
Stupidest thing I've read all year.
- (
cwbrenn
)
- (2)
- Jan. 7, 2004, 12:42:17 PM EST
Care to explain why?
- (
deSitter
)
- (1)
- Jan. 7, 2004, 02:43:50 PM EST
Or, in the words of Heinrich Heine:
- (
a6l6e6x
)
- Jan. 7, 2004, 04:02:35 PM EST
No, they do NOT meet here
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (30)
- Jan. 3, 2004, 10:09:25 PM EST
Yes indeed they do
- (
orion
)
- (29)
- Jan. 4, 2004, 08:52:10 PM EST
Talk about rapidly changing your position
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (6)
- Jan. 5, 2004, 12:59:16 PM EST
Fix your ring species link, please.
- (
admin
)
- Jan. 5, 2004, 12:01:04 PM EST
Not really
- (
orion
)
- (4)
- Jan. 7, 2004, 01:48:00 AM EST
You can use whatever definition you want
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (3)
- Jan. 7, 2004, 03:11:01 PM EST
Let us just agree to disagree then.
- (
orion
)
- (2)
- Jan. 8, 2004, 11:33:30 PM EST
/me chuckles while pulling hair out
-NT
- (
bepatient
)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 01:32:26 AM EST
Yes, we have passed the point of uselessness
- (
ben_tilly
)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 11:18:56 AM EST
Norman...
- (
pwhysall
)
- (21)
- Jan. 5, 2004, 12:23:46 PM EST
Peter...
- (
orion
)
- (20)
- Jan. 7, 2004, 02:20:13 AM EST
Riiiiiight.
- (
pwhysall
)
- (19)
- Jan. 7, 2004, 07:28:30 AM EST
Re: Riiiiiight.
- (
deSitter
)
- (1)
- Jan. 7, 2004, 07:31:50 AM EST
Re: Riiiiiight.
- (
pwhysall
)
- Jan. 7, 2004, 07:34:35 AM EST
It is because
- (
orion
)
- (16)
- Jan. 7, 2004, 08:45:33 AM EST
potential root cause is fear of death? Interesting
- (
boxley
)
- (15)
- Jan. 7, 2004, 12:35:46 PM EST
Fear of the known
- (
orion
)
- (14)
- Jan. 8, 2004, 10:36:29 PM EST
so fear is the main issue
- (
boxley
)
- (13)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 10:31:33 AM EST
"The Gift of Fear" is an interesting book.
- (
Another Scott
)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 10:40:46 AM EST
Perhaps it is part of the illness
- (
orion
)
- (11)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 12:45:23 PM EST
Re: Perhaps it is part of the illness
- (
deSitter
)
- (10)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 12:59:10 PM EST
You have no idea what you are talking about
- (
Nightowl
)
- (9)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 01:08:27 PM EST
Re: You have no idea what you are talking about
- (
deSitter
)
- (3)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 01:13:24 PM EST
You clearly stated...
- (
Nightowl
)
- (2)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 01:19:00 PM EST
Re: You clearly stated...
- (
deSitter
)
- (1)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 01:27:04 PM EST
Well as Scott said in the Hardware forum
- (
Nightowl
)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 01:31:13 PM EST
Not to mention
- (
orion
)
- (4)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 01:24:29 PM EST
Re: Not to mention
- (
deSitter
)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 01:30:20 PM EST
perhaps you need to take up driving in demolition derbies
- (
boxley
)
- (1)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 02:31:16 PM EST
You have a point
- (
orion
)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 03:31:59 PM EST
Nah, I agree with Ross
- (
lister
)
- Jan. 16, 2004, 03:09:01 PM EST
Science and Religion don't intersect much.
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- (60)
- Jan. 3, 2004, 11:28:58 PM EST
Re: Science and Religion don't intersect much.
- (
deSitter
)
- Jan. 3, 2004, 11:57:04 PM EST
Oh yeah?
- (
orion
)
- (58)
- Jan. 4, 2004, 08:55:49 PM EST
Still not getting it
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- (57)
- Jan. 4, 2004, 10:01:06 PM EST
No you are not getting it
- (
orion
)
- (56)
- Jan. 7, 2004, 02:00:18 AM EST
Re: No you are not getting it
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- (54)
- Jan. 7, 2004, 03:36:00 AM EST
You are getting some of it
- (
orion
)
- (53)
- Jan. 7, 2004, 09:07:54 AM EST
Re: You are getting some of it
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- (52)
- Jan. 7, 2004, 08:49:17 PM EST
One more time with feeling
- (
orion
)
- (51)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 12:02:38 AM EST
Re: One more time with feeling
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- (7)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 02:32:54 AM EST
Some more information
- (
orion
)
- (6)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 01:20:37 PM EST
What was the point of that?
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- (5)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 04:23:35 PM EST
The point was
- (
orion
)
- (4)
- Jan. 10, 2004, 01:05:16 PM EST
Re: The point was
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- (3)
- Jan. 10, 2004, 10:21:24 PM EST
Apparently you missed part of that review quote
- (
orion
)
- (2)
- Jan. 11, 2004, 02:37:38 PM EST
"Were atheists" ne "are atheists"
- (
ben_tilly
)
- Jan. 12, 2004, 12:21:32 AM EST
I saw that
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- Jan. 12, 2004, 03:19:08 PM EST
Ah, yes
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (42)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 11:16:38 AM EST
It shows an example
- (
orion
)
- (41)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 01:06:51 PM EST
You need some perspective
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (40)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 03:57:38 PM EST
excellent +10
- (
deSitter
)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 04:12:45 PM EST
And that is a decently compact one.
- (
Ashton
)
- Jan. 10, 2004, 07:10:52 AM EST
More suspect evidence
- (
orion
)
- (37)
- Jan. 10, 2004, 01:02:36 PM EST
Talk about missing the point
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (36)
- Jan. 10, 2004, 02:22:39 PM EST
I was presented it as
- (
orion
)
- (35)
- Jan. 10, 2004, 03:21:22 PM EST
What is that about motes vs beams?
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (34)
- Jan. 10, 2004, 04:03:38 PM EST
The truth is
- (
orion
)
- (33)
- Jan. 10, 2004, 05:36:48 PM EST
Do you think that your opinion should count or not?
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (32)
- Jan. 11, 2004, 12:51:47 AM EST
Everyone's opinions count
- (
orion
)
- (30)
- Jan. 11, 2004, 02:26:03 PM EST
Re: Everyone's opinions count
- (
jake123
)
- (28)
- Jan. 11, 2004, 11:36:18 PM EST
Re: Everyone's opinions count
- (
deSitter
)
- Jan. 11, 2004, 11:47:07 PM EST
Here in the US
- (
orion
)
- (26)
- Jan. 12, 2004, 11:59:25 AM EST
Not the same.
- (
admin
)
- (6)
- Jan. 12, 2004, 12:05:40 PM EST
I only ask
- (
orion
)
- (5)
- Jan. 12, 2004, 04:46:52 PM EST
That's not what you said.
-NT
- (
admin
)
- (4)
- Jan. 12, 2004, 04:47:54 PM EST
What did I say?
- (
orion
)
- (3)
- Jan. 12, 2004, 04:56:42 PM EST
MWBC. 'nuff said.
-NT
- (
jake123
)
- (2)
- Jan. 12, 2004, 04:58:27 PM EST
Sorry I did not get that
- (
orion
)
- (1)
- Jan. 12, 2004, 05:07:29 PM EST
Here's the one that I mean:
- (
jake123
)
- Jan. 12, 2004, 05:26:07 PM EST
Re: Here in the US
- (
jake123
)
- (18)
- Jan. 12, 2004, 12:50:44 PM EST
Well I could have been reading it wrong
- (
orion
)
- (17)
- Jan. 12, 2004, 05:05:23 PM EST
That wasn't your point
- (
jake123
)
- (16)
- Jan. 12, 2004, 05:24:39 PM EST
I had many points
- (
orion
)
- (15)
- Jan. 12, 2004, 05:39:52 PM EST
Passive aggressive too
-NT
- (
jake123
)
- (14)
- Jan. 12, 2004, 05:47:37 PM EST
You got more to add?
- (
orion
)
- (13)
- Jan. 12, 2004, 05:49:59 PM EST
Yes
- (
jake123
)
- (1)
- Jan. 12, 2004, 05:55:53 PM EST
I do agree with you somewhat
- (
orion
)
- Jan. 13, 2004, 01:22:53 AM EST
Ok, let me have a whack at it
- (
hnick
)
- (10)
- Jan. 12, 2004, 06:05:05 PM EST
Qualified opinions
- (
orion
)
- (9)
- Jan. 13, 2004, 07:08:54 PM EST
Shopping for experts
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (8)
- Jan. 14, 2004, 01:25:20 AM EST
Heh..
- (
Ashton
)
- Jan. 14, 2004, 08:13:37 AM EST
Searching for experts
- (
orion
)
- (6)
- Jan. 14, 2004, 10:52:17 AM EST
Any possibility of useful conversation has ended
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (5)
- Jan. 14, 2004, 11:25:42 AM EST
Obviously you are mistaken
- (
orion
)
- Jan. 14, 2004, 01:39:53 PM EST
Let me put it another way
- (
orion
)
- (3)
- Jan. 14, 2004, 04:55:15 PM EST
Re: Let me put it another way
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- Jan. 14, 2004, 06:03:45 PM EST
Please review the thread from the beginning.
- (
Another Scott
)
- Jan. 14, 2004, 08:22:08 PM EST
Die, Norman! Die! (new thread)
- (
rcareaga
)
- Jan. 14, 2004, 11:45:10 PM EST
But not equally
- (
ben_tilly
)
- Jan. 12, 2004, 12:10:02 AM EST
In the words of Dinah Maria Mulock Craik,
- (
a6l6e6x
)
- Jan. 11, 2004, 02:57:26 PM EST
You learn to Love the Mystery
- (
Ashton
)
- Jan. 7, 2004, 03:37:04 AM EST
You need to understand the meaning of the words you're using
- (
Another Scott
)
- (15)
- Jan. 4, 2004, 12:14:02 AM EST
Re: You need to understand the meaning of the words you're u
- (
deSitter
)
- (14)
- Jan. 4, 2004, 12:22:09 AM EST
9 times 6 is 42.
-NT
- (
admin
)
- Jan. 4, 2004, 12:42:44 AM EST
Yes and no.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (9)
- Jan. 4, 2004, 01:11:11 AM EST
That is not the reasonableness that Ross is asserting
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (8)
- Jan. 4, 2004, 03:51:46 AM EST
Hume discussed this
- (
jake123
)
- (1)
- Jan. 4, 2004, 11:10:45 AM EST
And to quote Aleister Crowley . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- Jan. 4, 2004, 12:49:52 PM EST
Even more interesting "reasonableness"
- (
Arkadiy
)
- (5)
- Jan. 6, 2004, 05:14:45 PM EST
Info is in the Principia.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (2)
- Jan. 6, 2004, 05:27:30 PM EST
Re: Info is in the Principia.
- (
deSitter
)
- (1)
- Jan. 7, 2004, 06:41:22 AM EST
I'm not
- (
ben_tilly
)
- Jan. 7, 2004, 02:47:19 PM EST
Several things
- (
ben_tilly
)
- Jan. 6, 2004, 05:39:23 PM EST
Re: Even more interesting "reasonableness"
- (
deSitter
)
- Jan. 7, 2004, 07:00:09 AM EST
To quote Slim Pickens in Blazing Saddles...
- (
danreck
)
- (2)
- Jan. 5, 2004, 04:55:16 PM EST
Re: To quote Slim Pickens in Blazing Saddles...
- (
deSitter
)
- (1)
- Jan. 5, 2004, 05:34:22 PM EST
It is the highest compliment I can give.
- (
danreck
)
- Jan. 6, 2004, 10:07:14 AM EST
And ill met they are
- (
tuberculosis
)
- Jan. 5, 2004, 05:02:38 PM EST
What I find unreasonable.
- (
static
)
- (64)
- Jan. 4, 2004, 02:29:44 AM EST
Re: What I find unreasonable.
- (
deSitter
)
- Jan. 4, 2004, 03:05:24 AM EST
But that WAS NOT excluded from the possibilities!
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (41)
- Jan. 4, 2004, 03:48:17 AM EST
Oops?
- (
Nightowl
)
- Jan. 5, 2004, 12:11:58 AM EST
I've been staying out of this...
- (
Nightowl
)
- (15)
- Jan. 4, 2004, 09:39:34 AM EST
Quite a few believe that
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (14)
- Jan. 4, 2004, 01:32:40 PM EST
I'm in that group
- (
FuManChu
)
- Jan. 4, 2004, 04:06:45 PM EST
Speaking of Catholic thought
- (
ChrisR
)
- (12)
- Jan. 4, 2004, 07:56:25 PM EST
Nowhere in particular
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (11)
- Jan. 5, 2004, 11:41:35 AM EST
Tielhard only wrote once about Piltdown
- (
ChrisR
)
- (10)
- Jan. 5, 2004, 01:03:15 PM EST
As I said, this I do not know about
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (9)
- Jan. 5, 2004, 04:31:03 PM EST
As long as this thread won't die
- (
ChrisR
)
- (8)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 11:35:53 AM EST
I see no evidence of a global goal direction
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (7)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 11:46:54 AM EST
Meandering along
- (
ChrisR
)
- (6)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 12:23:43 PM EST
Re: Meandering along
- (
deSitter
)
- (4)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 12:33:29 PM EST
Which touches on a different concern I've had....
- (
ChrisR
)
- (1)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 01:09:07 PM EST
Exactly!
- (
deSitter
)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 01:22:31 PM EST
Your knowledge is insufficient
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (1)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 04:11:04 PM EST
Fascinating - I stand corrected!
- (
deSitter
)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 04:18:42 PM EST
The boundaries are broader than you might think
- (
ben_tilly
)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 04:16:55 PM EST
Good.
- (
static
)
- (23)
- Jan. 6, 2004, 06:18:08 AM EST
You did not answer the question
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (4)
- Jan. 6, 2004, 10:56:53 AM EST
I rather thought I did.
- (
static
)
- (3)
- Jan. 7, 2004, 06:16:33 AM EST
Bullshit
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (2)
- Jan. 7, 2004, 11:21:00 AM EST
I made a mistake.
- (
static
)
- (1)
- Jan. 8, 2004, 10:36:13 PM EST
How you should interpret my actions
- (
ben_tilly
)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 12:08:33 PM EST
Pardon me, but that'll be when pigs fly.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (17)
- Jan. 8, 2004, 10:09:28 PM EST
Why would I assail you?
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (16)
- Jan. 8, 2004, 10:17:52 PM EST
Okay, here we go.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (15)
- Jan. 8, 2004, 11:33:26 PM EST
Umm *cough* - I thought this had been "done": piecemeal
- (
Ashton
)
- (7)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 01:30:19 AM EST
"Silly that"?
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (6)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 06:31:28 AM EST
Re: "Silly that"?
- (
deSitter
)
- (4)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 06:38:40 AM EST
Unless they look too deep.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (3)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 09:34:24 AM EST
? It's right on the surface
- (
deSitter
)
- (1)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 11:24:57 AM EST
Concur.
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 03:10:51 PM EST
You have to know what is relevant
- (
ben_tilly
)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 11:26:54 AM EST
Re: "Silly that"?
- (
Ashton
)
- Jan. 10, 2004, 06:35:37 AM EST
I think that you misunderstood me then
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (6)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 11:42:35 AM EST
What we can agree to disagree on.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (5)
- Jan. 13, 2004, 01:44:11 PM EST
If you need actual proof...
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (4)
- Jan. 13, 2004, 02:06:05 PM EST
Ah...
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (3)
- Jan. 13, 2004, 08:27:55 PM EST
Depends on which mathematical truth...
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (2)
- Jan. 14, 2004, 12:42:54 AM EST
IMO 'religion' is oft a sub-set: religiosity
- (
Ashton
)
- (1)
- Jan. 14, 2004, 08:07:49 AM EST
Einstein's thought on that:
- (
a6l6e6x
)
- Jan. 14, 2004, 05:05:32 PM EST
"special creation may have occurred"
- (
Ashton
)
- (4)
- Jan. 4, 2004, 05:48:50 AM EST
Ashton you know me better than that.
- (
static
)
- (3)
- Jan. 7, 2004, 05:49:46 AM EST
I think you meant...
- (
Nightowl
)
- (1)
- Jan. 6, 2004, 11:51:03 AM EST
Dang. Thanks.
-NT
- (
static
)
- Jan. 7, 2004, 05:49:19 AM EST
Why, of course..
- (
Ashton
)
- Jan. 7, 2004, 04:49:56 AM EST
Touching faith in the GICB's omnipotence.
- (
Silverlock
)
- (15)
- Jan. 4, 2004, 09:06:34 AM EST
Re: Touching faith in the GICB's omnipotence.
- (
deSitter
)
- (2)
- Jan. 4, 2004, 09:16:39 AM EST
Fundamentalists don't like mystery
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- Jan. 4, 2004, 02:29:43 PM EST
It is the Heat Death of the literalists -
- (
Ashton
)
- Jan. 4, 2004, 06:43:55 PM EST
Re: "right wicked sense of humor"?
- (
a6l6e6x
)
- (11)
- Jan. 4, 2004, 01:41:47 PM EST
What I believe
- (
orion
)
- (10)
- Jan. 4, 2004, 09:08:57 PM EST
Re: What I believe
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- (9)
- Jan. 4, 2004, 10:33:51 PM EST
Re: What I believe
- (
Ashton
)
- (2)
- Jan. 5, 2004, 08:21:13 PM EST
While you were out:
- (
danreck
)
- (1)
- Jan. 6, 2004, 05:04:06 PM EST
s'OK Danno
- (
Ashton
)
- Jan. 7, 2004, 04:03:12 AM EST
I see it as this
- (
orion
)
- (5)
- Jan. 7, 2004, 02:16:41 AM EST
Didn't address the issue
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- (4)
- Jan. 7, 2004, 03:51:29 AM EST
Disagree
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (3)
- Jan. 7, 2004, 10:46:02 AM EST
That's true
- (
Nightowl
)
- Jan. 7, 2004, 11:44:38 AM EST
Re: Disagree
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- (1)
- Jan. 7, 2004, 08:04:24 PM EST
It's most likely pointless
- (
Ashton
)
- Jan. 9, 2004, 01:58:20 AM EST
Faith and Science
- (
andread
)
- Jan. 6, 2004, 02:43:07 PM EST
i
we
they
.org
gconftool is used to control GConf from the command line.
269 ms