Man not allowed to wear a peace t-shirt in mall - (ben_tilly) - (52) - March 6, 2003, 07:20:20 AM EST
         I don't - (jake123) - (50) - March 6, 2003, 08:31:58 AM EST
             Malls are private property - (boxley) - (49) - March 6, 2003, 08:44:00 AM EST
                 Not quite any reason - (ben_tilly) - (48) - March 6, 2003, 08:46:33 AM EST
                     That may all be true you two... - (jake123) - (47) - March 6, 2003, 08:55:30 AM EST
                         Yup, 'xackly. -NT - (CRConrad) - March 6, 2003, 09:30:25 AM EST
                         That might have gotten the cops fired - (boxley) - (45) - March 6, 2003, 09:44:03 AM EST
                             Then you have a systemic problem. -NT - (jake123) - (44) - March 6, 2003, 11:08:16 AM EST
                                 yep, troublesome when the state works for the individuals - (boxley) - (43) - March 6, 2003, 12:06:47 PM EST
                                     Well, I can say - (jake123) - (36) - March 6, 2003, 12:14:49 PM EST
                                         Not exactly - (drewk) - (35) - March 6, 2003, 12:37:17 PM EST
                                             They should NOT, & (afaik) DO not, have that "right". - (CRConrad) - (34) - March 6, 2003, 03:33:44 PM EST
                                                 no shirt, no shoes, no service -NT - (SpiceWare) - (5) - March 6, 2003, 03:41:46 PM EST
                                                     Yeah, sure... But the point was, he HAD a shirt! - (CRConrad) - (4) - March 6, 2003, 03:58:11 PM EST
                                                         At the entrance to every Mall in America is a sign - (boxley) - March 6, 2003, 04:07:58 PM EST
                                                         not a functional requirement - (SpiceWare) - March 6, 2003, 04:55:43 PM EST
                                                         What's more... - (cwbrenn) - (1) - March 6, 2003, 05:08:31 PM EST
                                                             Ubersoft plotline: - (admin) - March 6, 2003, 05:10:45 PM EST
                                                 I've spent too long in Europe. - (Brandioch) - March 6, 2003, 03:57:35 PM EST
                                                 Yer starting to sound like Ashton - (jb4) - March 6, 2003, 07:01:04 PM EST
                                                 There's more to the story. - (static) - (1) - March 7, 2003, 06:15:07 AM EST
                                                     In that case... - (ben_tilly) - March 7, 2003, 07:09:57 AM EST
                                                 You do realize where he was, right? - (drewk) - (16) - March 7, 2003, 01:48:51 PM EST
                                                     or let smoke there? hopefully :0 -NT - (boxley) - March 7, 2003, 01:53:05 PM EST
                                                     Umm... Yes, I realise *exactly* where he was. Do YOU? - (CRConrad) - (14) - March 7, 2003, 06:32:42 PM EST
                                                         Then we just disagree - (drewk) - March 7, 2003, 08:46:17 PM EST
                                                         Wrong on a point - (boxley) - (12) - March 7, 2003, 09:14:07 PM EST
                                                             A) Too bloody obvious; B) Oh, that's "a rule", is it ?!? - (CRConrad) - (11) - March 8, 2003, 02:50:21 PM EST
                                                                 wasnt gaul where Julius made his bones? - (boxley) - (2) - March 8, 2003, 06:39:32 PM EST
                                                                     'Xackly - in Latin, it isn't "Gaul", but Gallia. - (CRConrad) - (1) - March 8, 2003, 11:53:16 PM EST
                                                                         {cackle} L'etat c'est Moi! Jacques Tati wherefore art thou? -NT - (Ashton) - March 9, 2003, 04:40:50 PM EST
                                                                 You clearly don't understand the U.S. - (drewk) - (7) - March 10, 2003, 08:31:56 AM EST
                                                                     Just because the USA is stupid, you don't have to be, too. - (CRConrad) - (6) - March 10, 2003, 10:30:35 AM EST
                                                                         Yeah, I can understand your anger, but... - (tseliot) - March 10, 2003, 11:16:23 AM EST
                                                                         I think you're still missing part of what I said - (drewk) - (4) - March 10, 2003, 12:53:21 PM EST
                                                                             No, it's becoming obvious YOU don't know what you're saying. - (CRConrad) - (3) - March 10, 2003, 05:07:46 PM EST
                                                                                 {sigh} And the jingoists want to suppress immigration - (Ashton) - March 11, 2003, 01:53:08 AM EST
                                                                                 Boy, did I say that badly - (drewk) - March 11, 2003, 08:34:34 AM EST
                                                                                 Very nicely put. - (mmoffitt) - March 11, 2003, 10:07:25 AM EST
                                                 It was more than just the shirt - (morganek) - (6) - March 7, 2003, 11:38:56 PM EST
                                                     " clearly states" - (Silverlock) - (5) - March 7, 2003, 11:54:50 PM EST
                                                         Re: " clearly states" - (morganek) - (4) - March 8, 2003, 12:25:44 AM EST
                                                             Doh! - (morganek) - (2) - March 8, 2003, 12:48:56 AM EST
                                                                 I can see why you wouldn't have noticed right off. -NT - (Silverlock) - (1) - March 8, 2003, 01:18:17 AM EST
                                                                     put an <hr> in that signature or some more <br>s before it! -NT - (folkert) - March 8, 2003, 09:00:05 AM EST
                                                             I'll have to take your word for it. - (Silverlock) - March 8, 2003, 01:15:17 AM EST
                                     "For individuals"? How many people have *you*... - (CRConrad) - (5) - March 6, 2003, 02:48:01 PM EST
                                         in practice yes, the constitution has been voided - (boxley) - March 6, 2003, 02:53:23 PM EST
                                         But it was a great idea. - (Brandioch) - March 6, 2003, 03:38:06 PM EST
                                         constitution or ex-parrot? - (rcareaga) - (2) - March 6, 2003, 04:05:46 PM EST
                                             There are a lot of quotes like that - (ben_tilly) - March 6, 2003, 07:05:59 PM EST
                                             Another variant has it - (Ashton) - March 8, 2003, 06:27:58 AM EST
         Update Security Guard fired, as I expected - (boxley) - March 9, 2003, 05:32:33 PM EST