Its not a hidden clause.
Its not a "lttle known sub-paragraph"
Its not any of these things.
Why.
Because the transaction was absolutely legal.
There was no circumventing involved.
There was no "loophole" involved.
But I expect you to continue this..and continue your attacks against me...simply because I know your position that anyone even remotely involved with the current US government is an evil, lying bastard thief...and then you get really nasty with oil men. So none of them could possibly be upholding the law. (except the Holy Ghost" tm of the law maybe)
You continue to INVENT "loopholes". Talk about "letter" versus "spirit" of the law (and then mention Clinton like I would have a different opinion if it were >him<)(post edit..sorry...not you) I don't have that problem...much as it would be >convenient< to assume.
Your "friend" continues to be too afraid to tackle any issue with me directly. But since he has been supporting Chirac..well you know where that leads..we're far enough right for that to be very clear.
I expect more of the same.