Let me see....

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #83,813 by Silverlock 2/24/03 3:40:38 PM Reply	Let me see.... You twist my words and ascribe to me positions I haven't taken. Why is that I wonder? Your "creative" recounting of my words- The French are not deserving of criticism. Never said it. Next The Americans are slime. No, the oil companies are slime, not Americans. Yet they are doing the exact same thing. Both the American and French oil companies are flouting the laws of their respective contries? Both are slime, like I've said before. As your premises are false, your conclusion is invalid. How many lives per gallon? --Sign outside of various churches
Post #83,815 by bepatient 2/24/03 3:44:58 PM Reply	Nice tap dance. Lets not see any more support of the French ... shall we... since nothing happens in their oil business (involving foreign reserves and contracting said reserves) that is not reviewed and approved by the government. Other than that. Since they are all slime...I suppose I'll let you dance out of this thread. You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #83,819 by Silverlock 2/24/03 3:57:39 PM Reply	Soft shoeing it. You seem to place a great deal of weight on my having posted the Ivins column defending France. I asked before, did you read the column? Do you know what she was pointing out? I don't remember her defending the business practices of the French in that column. I don't remember me ever saying anywhere that the French were not deserving of criticism or any words that could be construed that way. You argue your point as if I had woken you from a nap by shouting that position in your ear. You argue against that position quite well. Unfortunatly, it's not my position. How many lives per gallon? --Sign outside of various churches
Post #83,823 by bepatient 2/24/03 4:16:23 PM Reply	And I retract. Because you so eloquently clarified your position. Like I said...lets not see you joining in praise for Chirac, ok? You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #83,826 by Silverlock 2/24/03 4:35:46 PM Reply	Haven't yet. Don't expect to. How many lives per gallon? --Sign outside of various churches

An odd Iraq analysis - (cwbrenn) - (69) - Feb. 24, 2003, 07:24:54 AM EST

That would be cute if it weren't for ... - (dmarker) - (68) - Feb. 24, 2003, 08:29:11 AM EST

Oh, I believe the split is real. - (cwbrenn) - Feb. 24, 2003, 09:29:55 AM EST

You see...this is what I mean. - (bepatient) - (66) - Feb. 24, 2003, 09:54:47 AM EST

One other "minor detail" *you* "forgot" to mention - (Silverlock) - (65) - Feb. 24, 2003, 10:20:01 AM EST

*chuckle* - (bepatient) - (64) - Feb. 24, 2003, 10:41:26 AM EST

Just goes to show... - (marlowe) - (1) - Feb. 24, 2003, 11:24:54 AM EST

Also goes to show... - (bepatient) - Feb. 24, 2003, 11:34:54 AM EST

If the loophole fits, you must acquit? - (Silverlock) - (61) - Feb. 24, 2003, 12:00:42 PM EST

ROFL - (bepatient) - (60) - Feb. 24, 2003, 12:13:37 PM EST

Was it against the law for Halliburton to sell to Iraq? - (Silverlock) - (59) - Feb. 24, 2003, 12:27:39 PM EST

There you go again. - (bepatient) - (47) - Feb. 24, 2003, 12:53:47 PM EST

Hypocrisy? - (Silverlock) - (34) - Feb. 24, 2003, 01:44:00 PM EST

Yes. Clearly. - (bepatient) - (33) - Feb. 24, 2003, 02:03:53 PM EST

You missed something - (Silverlock) - (32) - Feb. 24, 2003, 02:12:23 PM EST

I guess the link to Molly... - (bepatient) - (31) - Feb. 24, 2003, 02:48:53 PM EST

Back to the point, shall we? - (Silverlock) - (30) - Feb. 24, 2003, 03:02:28 PM EST

Questions - (drewk) - (23) - Feb. 24, 2003, 03:14:04 PM EST

Good questions. - (Silverlock) - (22) - Feb. 24, 2003, 03:24:01 PM EST

Find those sources. - (bepatient) - (19) - Feb. 24, 2003, 03:30:31 PM EST

You feel good about defending slime? - (Silverlock) - (18) - Feb. 24, 2003, 03:44:26 PM EST

Oh. So you lie about something... - (bepatient) - (17) - Feb. 24, 2003, 03:49:09 PM EST

Lie? - (Silverlock) - (16) - Feb. 24, 2003, 04:03:15 PM EST

The only one - (bepatient) - (15) - Feb. 24, 2003, 04:13:33 PM EST

If you say so. - (Silverlock) - (14) - Feb. 24, 2003, 04:46:47 PM EST

Hmmm. - (bepatient) - (13) - Feb. 24, 2003, 05:01:17 PM EST

plain enough - (Silverlock) - (12) - Feb. 24, 2003, 08:55:00 PM EST

Is OJ guilty of murder? - (Brandioch) - (11) - Feb. 24, 2003, 10:15:24 PM EST

ok, - (Silverlock) - (2) - Feb. 24, 2003, 10:35:44 PM EST

In any case...relax..... - (Simon_Jester) - (1) - Feb. 24, 2003, 10:42:20 PM EST

You want me to stay calm? - (Silverlock) - Feb. 24, 2003, 11:01:17 PM EST

Nobody called it a loophole... - (bepatient) - (7) - Feb. 24, 2003, 11:39:37 PM EST

You don't consider this a loophole? - (Silverlock) - (6) - Feb. 24, 2003, 11:49:50 PM EST

Another possible factor. - (Brandioch) - Feb. 25, 2003, 12:11:51 AM EST

Obviously not. - (bepatient) - (4) - Feb. 25, 2003, 01:19:56 AM EST

Take it slow - (Silverlock) - (3) - Feb. 25, 2003, 01:23:09 PM EST

I did. - (bepatient) - (2) - Feb. 25, 2003, 02:45:23 PM EST

Letter vs spirit post wasn't from me. - (Silverlock) - (1) - Feb. 25, 2003, 03:03:26 PM EST

Yep...review complete. - (bepatient) - Feb. 25, 2003, 03:26:09 PM EST

The problem is still larger than just this one instance - (drewk) - (1) - Feb. 24, 2003, 03:39:52 PM EST

Like I said - (Silverlock) - Feb. 24, 2003, 03:47:10 PM EST

Essential to the hypocrisy, - (bepatient) - (5) - Feb. 24, 2003, 03:29:32 PM EST

Let me see.... - (Silverlock) - (4) - Feb. 24, 2003, 03:40:38 PM EST

Nice tap dance. - (bepatient) - (3) - Feb. 24, 2003, 03:44:58 PM EST

Soft shoeing it. - (Silverlock) - (2) - Feb. 24, 2003, 03:57:39 PM EST

And I retract. - (bepatient) - (1) - Feb. 24, 2003, 04:16:23 PM EST

Haven't yet. - (Silverlock) - Feb. 24, 2003, 04:35:46 PM EST

Beep, the New World Order proselyte!!! - (jb4) - (11) - Feb. 25, 2003, 02:04:23 PM EST

Question, it is illegal for US Citizens to travel to cuba - (boxley) - (2) - Feb. 25, 2003, 02:07:57 PM EST

Not even applicable here. - (bepatient) - Feb. 25, 2003, 02:50:54 PM EST

Actually, its not - (tuberculosis) - Feb. 25, 2003, 05:38:46 PM EST

And they did. - (bepatient) - (7) - Feb. 25, 2003, 02:47:00 PM EST

Here's what I follow: - (jb4) - (6) - Feb. 25, 2003, 07:07:15 PM EST

You want to give a link? - (bepatient) - (5) - Feb. 25, 2003, 11:52:45 PM EST

Well, I did a search... - (jb4) - (4) - Feb. 27, 2003, 09:53:26 AM EST

There has been... - (bepatient) - (3) - Feb. 27, 2003, 12:27:03 PM EST

Nope. Clear. - (jb4) - (2) - Feb. 27, 2003, 01:53:52 PM EST

Only dimples. Else there be lawlessness :) -NT - (bepatient) - (1) - Feb. 27, 2003, 03:34:22 PM EST

Propinquitous LRPD:____ *snort* -NT - (Ashton) - Feb. 28, 2003, 02:48:27 AM EST

WashPost said it was legal. - (Another Scott) - (10) - Feb. 24, 2003, 04:59:32 PM EST

Reality. What a concept. -NT - (bepatient) - Feb. 24, 2003, 05:03:06 PM EST

Define "work". - (mmoffitt) - (8) - Feb. 24, 2003, 05:19:20 PM EST

No sanctions haven't worked - they haven't made Iraq comply. - (Another Scott) - (6) - Feb. 24, 2003, 05:40:16 PM EST

So whaddya think..we need one more resolution, right? ;-) -NT - (bepatient) - Feb. 24, 2003, 05:45:43 PM EST

Thanks for a cant-free report. Circle-jerk present. - (Ashton) - (3) - Feb. 24, 2003, 07:04:39 PM EST

See the Halliburton thread. - (Brandioch) - Feb. 24, 2003, 07:31:23 PM EST

Yup Ash - good call - could see where this thread was head - (dmarker) - (1) - Feb. 25, 2003, 02:05:18 AM EST

Sad. - (bepatient) - Feb. 25, 2003, 02:32:25 AM EST

Good points. However, ... - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 28, 2003, 04:05:31 PM EST

Yep. - (Brandioch) - Feb. 24, 2003, 06:27:16 PM EST

Powered by isospin!
84 ms