IWETHEY v. 0.3.0
|
TODO
1,095 registered users | 0
active users
| 0 LpH |
Statistics
Login
|
Create New User
Welcome to IWETHEY!
IWETHEY Home
/
IWETHEY Board
/
Open Forum
/
Thought it was obvious, but okay
Post #303,749
by
drook
2/6/09 10:58:45 PM
Reply
Thought it was obvious, but okay
My point is without "strings" there's no reason to believe the money will be used for its "explicit purpose".
--
Drew
Post #303,750
by
beepster
2/6/09 11:14:29 PM
Reply
Block grants happen all the time
and go into state general funds.
Maybe NY should buy CT. Almost everybody in CT works there already.
I will choose a path that's clear. I will choose freewill.
gore is in DC again
- (
boxley
)
- (79)
- Jan. 27, 2009, 12:57:06 PM EST
Re: gore is in DC again
- (
beepster
)
- (78)
- Jan. 27, 2009, 05:23:01 PM EST
Nah! Other states would parrot California.
- (
a6l6e6x
)
- Jan. 27, 2009, 05:35:04 PM EST
disagree california is the 8th largest economy in the world
- (
boxley
)
- Jan. 27, 2009, 07:57:41 PM EST
you can't really believe this
- (
rcareaga
)
- (75)
- Jan. 27, 2009, 08:43:26 PM EST
What's not to believe
- (
beepster
)
- (74)
- Jan. 27, 2009, 09:38:52 PM EST
You apparently don't understand the law in this case.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (70)
- Jan. 27, 2009, 09:55:53 PM EST
I understand.
- (
beepster
)
- (69)
- Jan. 27, 2009, 10:19:00 PM EST
If wishes were horses...
- (
Another Scott
)
- (61)
- Jan. 27, 2009, 11:05:26 PM EST
Settled law is only settled until its changed.
- (
beepster
)
- (60)
- Jan. 27, 2009, 11:38:46 PM EST
So everything not prohibited should be required?
-NT
- (
drook
)
- (59)
- Jan. 27, 2009, 11:59:21 PM EST
?
- (
beepster
)
- (58)
- Jan. 28, 2009, 12:00:34 AM EST
Don't know what point you were trying to make
- (
drook
)
- (57)
- Jan. 28, 2009, 12:32:04 AM EST
Lead
- (
beepster
)
- (5)
- Jan. 28, 2009, 01:05:17 AM EST
Now: two standards; future: two standards - no fragmentation
-NT
- (
drook
)
- (4)
- Jan. 28, 2009, 01:13:29 AM EST
Not how it works
- (
beepster
)
- (3)
- Jan. 28, 2009, 01:57:39 AM EST
"Similar Legislation" != "Similar Standards"
- (
Another Scott
)
- (2)
- Jan. 28, 2009, 07:13:29 AM EST
Of course I am
-NT
- (
beepster
)
- (1)
- Jan. 28, 2009, 07:38:42 AM EST
The obdurate path is never an easy one..
-NT
- (
Ashton
)
- Jan. 28, 2009, 04:56:34 PM EST
Les'see - where does BeeP usually stand on "State's Rights"?
- (
CRConrad
)
- (50)
- Feb. 4, 2009, 11:30:49 AM EST
National versus State versus Local
- (
beepster
)
- (48)
- Feb. 4, 2009, 11:58:54 AM EST
But with gas, don't we *need* different formulations?
- (
drook
)
- (8)
- Feb. 4, 2009, 12:25:31 PM EST
That's what I'm saying
- (
beepster
)
- (7)
- Feb. 4, 2009, 07:52:16 PM EST
Okay
- (
drook
)
- (6)
- Feb. 4, 2009, 10:21:41 PM EST
sigh
- (
beepster
)
- (4)
- Feb. 5, 2009, 02:01:06 AM EST
Not invention, logical extension
-NT
- (
drook
)
- (3)
- Feb. 5, 2009, 08:50:26 AM EST
Who's logic?
- (
beepster
)
- (2)
- Feb. 5, 2009, 04:40:22 PM EST
Power comes from the # of dollars, not the margins.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (1)
- Feb. 5, 2009, 06:02:50 PM EST
I don't think so
- (
beepster
)
- Feb. 6, 2009, 08:23:25 AM EST
part of the problem we had in atlanta was the lack of
- (
boxley
)
- Feb. 5, 2009, 09:23:08 AM EST
Didn't hear you harping on Bush for this, though.
- (
CRConrad
)
- (38)
- Feb. 5, 2009, 04:00:11 AM EST
sigh redux
-NT
- (
beepster
)
- (37)
- Feb. 5, 2009, 07:21:28 AM EST
Yes, I guess sigh is all you can do - not having any answer.
-NT
- (
CRConrad
)
- (36)
- Feb. 6, 2009, 02:50:09 AM EST
Sure I have one
- (
beepster
)
- (35)
- Feb. 6, 2009, 08:35:08 AM EST
Here's the problem with the way you present your agruments
- (
drook
)
- (34)
- Feb. 6, 2009, 09:45:25 AM EST
But I think his point is...
- (
folkert
)
- Feb. 6, 2009, 09:51:37 AM EST
Bwah ha ha ha
- (
beepster
)
- (32)
- Feb. 6, 2009, 10:18:32 AM EST
You're conflating things again...
- (
Another Scott
)
- (9)
- Feb. 6, 2009, 11:45:10 AM EST
Am I.
- (
beepster
)
- (8)
- Feb. 6, 2009, 05:54:01 PM EST
the stimulus to you and I was not a mistake
- (
boxley
)
- Feb. 6, 2009, 06:31:24 PM EST
Black or white, again ... strawman much?
- (
drook
)
- (5)
- Feb. 6, 2009, 07:54:06 PM EST
Excuse me?
- (
beepster
)
- (4)
- Feb. 6, 2009, 08:15:03 PM EST
What did you mean by strings, then?
- (
drook
)
- (3)
- Feb. 6, 2009, 09:18:54 PM EST
Your point?
- (
beepster
)
- (2)
- Feb. 6, 2009, 10:34:27 PM EST
Thought it was obvious, but okay
- (
drook
)
- (1)
- Feb. 6, 2009, 10:58:45 PM EST
Block grants happen all the time
- (
beepster
)
- Feb. 6, 2009, 11:14:29 PM EST
Year by year, you sound more and more like...
- (
CRConrad
)
- April 22, 2009, 08:03:14 AM EDT
That's not a problem with government per se
- (
jake123
)
- (2)
- Feb. 6, 2009, 11:46:06 AM EST
Double edge on healthcare.
- (
beepster
)
- (1)
- Feb. 6, 2009, 05:58:18 PM EST
get rid of the last 8 months of life would slice our
- (
boxley
)
- Feb. 6, 2009, 06:33:19 PM EST
Wait, Greg was right, that *is* your point?
- (
drook
)
- (18)
- Feb. 6, 2009, 12:14:37 PM EST
Can't or won't?
- (
beepster
)
- (17)
- Feb. 6, 2009, 06:10:28 PM EST
Right
- (
drook
)
- (16)
- Feb. 6, 2009, 07:58:55 PM EST
Sure I do.
- (
beepster
)
- (15)
- Feb. 6, 2009, 08:19:47 PM EST
Repairing the National Mall is infrastructure...
- (
Another Scott
)
- (13)
- Feb. 6, 2009, 08:31:33 PM EST
Re: Repairing the National Mall is infrastructure...
- (
beepster
)
- (12)
- Feb. 6, 2009, 10:38:34 PM EST
Some of them screamed about everything, at various points.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (11)
- Feb. 6, 2009, 10:51:12 PM EST
His plan was garbage too
- (
beepster
)
- (10)
- Feb. 6, 2009, 11:18:42 PM EST
You're not paying attention. See HR 1 preamble text again.
-NT
- (
Another Scott
)
- (9)
- Feb. 6, 2009, 11:22:04 PM EST
Re: You're not paying attention. See HR 1 preamble text aga
- (
beepster
)
- (8)
- Feb. 7, 2009, 10:13:52 AM EST
Eh?
- (
Another Scott
)
- (7)
- Feb. 7, 2009, 11:03:04 AM EST
75% spend within 18 months.
- (
beepster
)
- (6)
- Feb. 7, 2009, 12:30:28 PM EST
More words, please.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (5)
- Feb. 7, 2009, 12:51:07 PM EST
Re: More words, please.
- (
beepster
)
- (4)
- Feb. 7, 2009, 01:11:04 PM EST
:-)
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- Feb. 7, 2009, 03:04:56 PM EST
That's a number proposed by a citizen on a web page.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (2)
- Feb. 7, 2009, 03:32:26 PM EST
Thanks for weasel wording for him.
-NT
- (
beepster
)
- (1)
- Feb. 7, 2009, 05:07:02 PM EST
Thought the weasel was the Patron Saint of Reactionaries :-0
-NT
- (
Ashton
)
- Feb. 7, 2009, 07:10:22 PM EST
Right, again
- (
drook
)
- Feb. 6, 2009, 09:22:18 PM EST
Now, now -- it's hard to be an Ayn-Marxist
- (
Ashton
)
- Feb. 4, 2009, 05:08:27 PM EST
There should be a number of gasoline mixes . . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (6)
- Jan. 27, 2009, 11:13:35 PM EST
and grousing from buyers
- (
beepster
)
- Jan. 27, 2009, 11:43:16 PM EST
You're talking about practical reasons for different mixes.
- (
static
)
- Jan. 28, 2009, 01:08:00 AM EST
hows that groundwater poisoning working out?
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- (3)
- Jan. 28, 2009, 08:55:26 AM EST
Stupidity re chemistry goes with general dumbth. Move, then?
-NT
- (
Ashton
)
- (2)
- Jan. 28, 2009, 05:20:53 PM EST
dont let science and mtbe get in your way
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- (1)
- Jan. 28, 2009, 08:35:56 PM EST
Don't let snide intransigence get in yours :-0
-NT
- (
Ashton
)
- Jan. 30, 2009, 03:21:08 PM EST
You're aware that the "boutique" fuel problem was addressed?
- (
Another Scott
)
- (2)
- Feb. 4, 2009, 10:54:09 PM EST
That can't be true
- (
drook
)
- (1)
- Feb. 4, 2009, 11:29:07 PM EST
and... *AND*
- (
folkert
)
- Feb. 4, 2009, 11:57:38 PM EST
i
we
they
.org
Nothing like the smell of Nadsat in the morning!
91 ms