You're aware that the "boutique" fuel problem was addressed?

This was a big topic about 4 years ago, but the EPA issued new rules in December 2006. It wasn't that big a deal to begin with, IMO...

http://www.epa.gov/oms/boutique.htm

Twelve states have adopted their own clean fuel programs for part or all of the state. Most of these states require gasoline with lower volatility than federal standards, and most are effective for only part of the year. These state fuel programs make up eight different kinds of fuels. The federal programs (Reformulated Gasoline and low Reid Vapor Pressure) make up four different kinds of fuel. The combination of federal fuel programs and states' abilities to adopt state fuel controls is intended to reflect a balance that allows areas sufficient flexibility to accomplish air quality needs.

I see 7 types of fuel, plus a low sulfur diesel, listed here:

http://www.epa.gov/o...boutique-list.htm

As to why there shouldn't be a single national standard, it's simple - The fuel standards are based on air quality rules, and the ability of a locality to meet those rules depend on the local environment. These additives aren't free, and can cost in terms of mileage, so requiring everyone to use them doesn't make sense for lots of reasons.

HTH.

Cheers,
Scott.

Post #303,635 by Another Scott 2/4/09 10:54:09 PM Reply	You're aware that the "boutique" fuel problem was addressed? This was a big topic about 4 years ago, but the EPA issued new rules in December 2006. It wasn't that big a deal to begin with, IMO... http://www.epa.gov/oms/boutique.htm Twelve states have adopted their own clean fuel programs for part or all of the state. Most of these states require gasoline with lower volatility than federal standards, and most are effective for only part of the year. These state fuel programs make up eight different kinds of fuels. The federal programs (Reformulated Gasoline and low Reid Vapor Pressure) make up four different kinds of fuel. The combination of federal fuel programs and states' abilities to adopt state fuel controls is intended to reflect a balance that allows areas sufficient flexibility to accomplish air quality needs. I see 7 types of fuel, plus a low sulfur diesel, listed here: http://www.epa.gov/o...boutique-list.htm As to why there shouldn't be a single national standard, it's simple - The fuel standards are based on air quality rules, and the ability of a locality to meet those rules depend on the local environment. These additives aren't free, and can cost in terms of mileage, so requiring everyone to use them doesn't make sense for lots of reasons. HTH. Cheers, Scott.
Post #303,637 by drook 2/4/09 11:29:07 PM Reply	That can't be true This problem, which you're now saying isn't really a problem, is being used as the template to attack fuel economy legislation. If this isn't a problem, that would suggest that maybe the fuel economy problem ... isn't. And that, as I said above, can't be true. -- Drew
Post #303,639 by folkert 2/4/09 11:57:38 PM Reply	and... AND 2 of the Big 3 that got a "bailout" are ramping up legal fights to shoot down those fuel economy standards... with our own damn money we just gave them! I call WTF!?

Welcome to IWETHEY!