Et tu, Brute - (deSitter) - (61) - July 5, 2004, 01:39:22 PM EDT
         We've argued this one before - (ben_tilly) - (45) - July 5, 2004, 02:05:06 PM EDT
             Re: We've argued this one before - (deSitter) - (30) - July 5, 2004, 02:08:00 PM EDT
                 The problem is the employees. - (Another Scott) - (14) - July 5, 2004, 03:54:46 PM EDT
                     lets use that employee argument in another industry - (boxley) - (13) - July 6, 2004, 10:55:37 PM EDT
                         OSHA on autobody spray painting. - (Another Scott) - (12) - July 6, 2004, 11:52:19 PM EDT
                             I thought you were whining about employees? - (boxley) - (11) - July 7, 2004, 09:56:20 AM EDT
                                 Your right to swing your fist ends at my nose. - (inthane-chan) - (3) - July 7, 2004, 10:47:29 AM EDT
                                     not in my bar it dont. - (boxley) - (2) - July 7, 2004, 10:52:13 AM EDT
                                         That's why 2/3rds of the population stays out of bars. -NT - (inthane-chan) - (1) - July 7, 2004, 10:54:46 AM EDT
                                             And they're free to do that ... or open their own bars -NT - (drewk) - July 7, 2004, 11:03:41 AM EDT
                                 Good catch. - (Another Scott) - (6) - July 7, 2004, 11:04:42 AM EDT
                                     the process in a bar - (boxley) - (5) - July 7, 2004, 11:08:37 AM EDT
                                         Now you're redirecting. Employees are doing 1 and 2? -NT - (Another Scott) - (4) - July 7, 2004, 11:11:14 AM EDT
                                             Never worked at a bar, I see -NT - (drewk) - (2) - July 7, 2004, 11:14:33 AM EDT
                                                 I did, briefly. <hack, cough> Not many tips for 1, 2 though. -NT - (Another Scott) - (1) - July 7, 2004, 11:17:53 AM EDT
                                                     Dude, that *is* the tip -NT - (drewk) - July 7, 2004, 11:29:25 AM EDT
                                             ya wanna get some regular, work at a bar -NT - (boxley) - July 7, 2004, 11:26:21 AM EDT
                 The state giveth, the state taketh away - (ben_tilly) - (14) - July 5, 2004, 04:14:35 PM EDT
                     60 Minutes story on eminent domain - (lister) - (7) - July 5, 2004, 04:44:26 PM EDT
                         Pah, Mike Wallace. - (admin) - (6) - July 5, 2004, 06:35:02 PM EDT
                             Wasn't that something that came up at the party? - (ben_tilly) - (3) - July 5, 2004, 07:35:25 PM EDT
                                 (Nothing to see. (Thanks)). -NT - (Another Scott) - (1) - July 5, 2004, 07:39:18 PM EDT
                                     I don't know how that happened - (ben_tilly) - July 5, 2004, 07:39:54 PM EDT
                                 Mine. -NT - (admin) - July 5, 2004, 09:01:01 PM EDT
                             Explain -NT - (broomberg) - (1) - July 5, 2004, 06:56:08 PM EDT
                                 Re: Explain - (admin) - July 5, 2004, 09:06:31 PM EDT
                     You have no problem with government ownership of everything? - (imric) - (5) - July 5, 2004, 10:23:33 PM EDT
                         You got it - (ben_tilly) - (4) - July 6, 2004, 01:10:00 AM EDT
                             Excuse me? - (imric) - (3) - July 6, 2004, 06:52:59 AM EDT
                                 You'd be an example of someone who feels differently - (ben_tilly) - (2) - July 6, 2004, 10:29:30 AM EDT
                                     And now - (imric) - (1) - July 6, 2004, 12:35:56 PM EDT
                                         Prepare your residence for quartering -NT - (ChrisR) - July 6, 2004, 12:43:56 PM EDT
             Why doesn't anyone else notice? - (drewk) - (13) - July 6, 2004, 11:22:14 AM EDT
                 Because that doesn't work - (ben_tilly) - (12) - July 6, 2004, 11:51:56 AM EDT
                     So who cares more? - (drewk) - (11) - July 6, 2004, 01:54:54 PM EDT
                         Re: So who cares more? - (deSitter) - July 6, 2004, 02:06:08 PM EDT
                         Because a critical group is invisible - (ben_tilly) - (9) - July 6, 2004, 06:55:30 PM EDT
                             Ah, that invisible opportunity cost. - (a6l6e6x) - July 6, 2004, 07:24:16 PM EDT
                             Re: Because a critical group is invisible - (deSitter) - (7) - July 6, 2004, 08:24:31 PM EDT
                                 Really? - (admin) - (6) - July 6, 2004, 08:27:09 PM EDT
                                     Re: Really? - (deSitter) - (5) - July 6, 2004, 08:30:52 PM EDT
                                         I don't live there. - (admin) - (4) - July 6, 2004, 08:32:11 PM EDT
                                             Re: I don't live there. - (deSitter) - (3) - July 6, 2004, 08:34:28 PM EDT
                                                 High side of 20%... - (admin) - (2) - July 6, 2004, 09:09:37 PM EDT
                                                     $5 for two beers - (deSitter) - (1) - July 6, 2004, 09:12:05 PM EDT
                                                         That won't buy one at ballgame. -NT - (jbrabeck) - July 6, 2004, 10:35:58 PM EDT
         Horribly overboard - (JayMehaffey) - July 5, 2004, 02:08:43 PM EDT
         Tough luck - (lister) - (10) - July 5, 2004, 03:45:14 PM EDT
             A-friggin'-men. -NT - (inthane-chan) - (9) - July 5, 2004, 06:57:15 PM EDT
                 "A-friggin'-men." - it's the new MeToo! (tm) - (Meerkat) - (8) - July 5, 2004, 07:47:35 PM EDT
                     Here in Kingston, Ontario - (jake123) - (7) - July 5, 2004, 10:24:12 PM EDT
                         Hasten the old folks to the grave - (lister) - (6) - July 5, 2004, 10:32:04 PM EDT
                             Re: parents who smoke in front of their kids - (a6l6e6x) - (5) - July 6, 2004, 12:42:12 PM EDT
                                 My wife and SIL had non smoking seats on Aeroflot. - (Another Scott) - (2) - July 6, 2004, 12:52:13 PM EDT
                                     Re: My wife and SIL had non smoking seats on Aeroflot. - (deSitter) - July 6, 2004, 12:58:56 PM EDT
                                     Another recent Aeroflot story. - (Another Scott) - July 20, 2004, 10:29:53 AM EDT
                                 Smoking & non-smoking sections on airplanes - (StevenYap) - (1) - July 8, 2004, 03:27:18 AM EDT
                                     Now don't start getting all logical on us... -NT - (Another Scott) - July 8, 2004, 07:11:57 AM EDT
         I see what you posted - (orion) - July 9, 2004, 07:09:11 PM EDT
         Bloomington (MN) Bans Smoking - (jbrabeck) - (1) - July 20, 2004, 10:37:26 AM EDT
             I'm sure we can go for !00% Sin-free, next. -NT - (Ashton) - July 21, 2004, 06:33:39 PM EDT