and I understand. You want government to do less regulation, much like Conservative Republicans. Perhaps more like Classical Economists, you want more of a hands off type of government? How dare they limit your rights and what you can and can not do? You should be able to smoke as much as you want, any time you want, at any place. People suffering from second-hand smoke and getting sick is not your responsibility. It is their responsibility for breathing the second-hand smoke. Their rights to a smoke-free evironment should not take away your right to smoke. It does not matter to you that it affects their health, nor does it matter to you if it affects your health. Your only concern is your enjoyment of smoking, and how dare the government say that you cannot smoke in public, or at a pub or bar, or any other place. Your rights as a smoker, obviously, outweigh the rights of the non-smokers.

Did I get it right?