Wasn't that something that came up at the party?

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #162,935 by ben_tilly 7/5/04 6:50:20 PM 7/5/04 7:35:25 PM Reply	Wasn't that something that came up at the party? Dang, whose story was that? Cheers, Ben To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act - [link\|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20\|Nebraska Supreme Court] Edited by ben_tilly July 5, 2004, 07:34:35 PM EDT Edited by ben_tilly July 5, 2004, 07:35:25 PM EDT Expand All History
Post #162,944 by Another Scott 7/5/04 7:09:02 PM 7/5/04 7:39:18 PM Reply	(Nothing to see. (Thanks)). Edited by Another Scott July 5, 2004, 07:36:20 PM EDT Edited by Another Scott July 5, 2004, 07:39:18 PM EDT Expand All History
Post #162,947 by ben_tilly 7/5/04 7:39:54 PM Reply	I don't know how that happened I don't have those boxes normally unchecked. And I don't remember unchecking them. I've seen a bug like that on a Perl website which was using the POST method. It can happen sporadically when the software does not check whether the amount of data received matches what CONTENT_LENGTH said should be sent. (Perl's CGI.pm only remembered to do that on multi-part posts. I sent in a bug report. I'm not sure that it was acted on though.) Cheers, Ben To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act - [link\|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20\|Nebraska Supreme Court]
Post #162,967 by admin 7/5/04 9:01:01 PM Reply	Mine. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."

Et tu, Brute - (deSitter) - (61) - July 5, 2004, 01:39:22 PM EDT

We've argued this one before - (ben_tilly) - (45) - July 5, 2004, 02:05:06 PM EDT

Re: We've argued this one before - (deSitter) - (30) - July 5, 2004, 02:08:00 PM EDT

The problem is the employees. - (Another Scott) - (14) - July 5, 2004, 03:54:46 PM EDT

lets use that employee argument in another industry - (boxley) - (13) - July 6, 2004, 10:55:37 PM EDT

OSHA on autobody spray painting. - (Another Scott) - (12) - July 6, 2004, 11:52:19 PM EDT

I thought you were whining about employees? - (boxley) - (11) - July 7, 2004, 09:56:20 AM EDT

Your right to swing your fist ends at my nose. - (inthane-chan) - (3) - July 7, 2004, 10:47:29 AM EDT

not in my bar it dont. - (boxley) - (2) - July 7, 2004, 10:52:13 AM EDT

That's why 2/3rds of the population stays out of bars. -NT - (inthane-chan) - (1) - July 7, 2004, 10:54:46 AM EDT

And they're free to do that ... or open their own bars -NT - (drewk) - July 7, 2004, 11:03:41 AM EDT

Good catch. - (Another Scott) - (6) - July 7, 2004, 11:04:42 AM EDT

the process in a bar - (boxley) - (5) - July 7, 2004, 11:08:37 AM EDT

Now you're redirecting. Employees are doing 1 and 2? -NT - (Another Scott) - (4) - July 7, 2004, 11:11:14 AM EDT

Never worked at a bar, I see -NT - (drewk) - (2) - July 7, 2004, 11:14:33 AM EDT

I did, briefly. <hack, cough> Not many tips for 1, 2 though. -NT - (Another Scott) - (1) - July 7, 2004, 11:17:53 AM EDT

Dude, that *is* the tip -NT - (drewk) - July 7, 2004, 11:29:25 AM EDT

ya wanna get some regular, work at a bar -NT - (boxley) - July 7, 2004, 11:26:21 AM EDT

The state giveth, the state taketh away - (ben_tilly) - (14) - July 5, 2004, 04:14:35 PM EDT

60 Minutes story on eminent domain - (lister) - (7) - July 5, 2004, 04:44:26 PM EDT

Pah, Mike Wallace. - (admin) - (6) - July 5, 2004, 06:35:02 PM EDT

Wasn't that something that came up at the party? - (ben_tilly) - (3) - July 5, 2004, 07:35:25 PM EDT

(Nothing to see. (Thanks)). -NT - (Another Scott) - (1) - July 5, 2004, 07:39:18 PM EDT

I don't know how that happened - (ben_tilly) - July 5, 2004, 07:39:54 PM EDT

Mine. -NT - (admin) - July 5, 2004, 09:01:01 PM EDT

Explain -NT - (broomberg) - (1) - July 5, 2004, 06:56:08 PM EDT

Re: Explain - (admin) - July 5, 2004, 09:06:31 PM EDT

You have no problem with government ownership of everything? - (imric) - (5) - July 5, 2004, 10:23:33 PM EDT

You got it - (ben_tilly) - (4) - July 6, 2004, 01:10:00 AM EDT

Excuse me? - (imric) - (3) - July 6, 2004, 06:52:59 AM EDT

You'd be an example of someone who feels differently - (ben_tilly) - (2) - July 6, 2004, 10:29:30 AM EDT

And now - (imric) - (1) - July 6, 2004, 12:35:56 PM EDT

Prepare your residence for quartering -NT - (ChrisR) - July 6, 2004, 12:43:56 PM EDT

Why doesn't anyone else notice? - (drewk) - (13) - July 6, 2004, 11:22:14 AM EDT

Because that doesn't work - (ben_tilly) - (12) - July 6, 2004, 11:51:56 AM EDT

So who cares more? - (drewk) - (11) - July 6, 2004, 01:54:54 PM EDT

Re: So who cares more? - (deSitter) - July 6, 2004, 02:06:08 PM EDT

Because a critical group is invisible - (ben_tilly) - (9) - July 6, 2004, 06:55:30 PM EDT

Ah, that invisible opportunity cost. - (a6l6e6x) - July 6, 2004, 07:24:16 PM EDT

Re: Because a critical group is invisible - (deSitter) - (7) - July 6, 2004, 08:24:31 PM EDT

Really? - (admin) - (6) - July 6, 2004, 08:27:09 PM EDT

Re: Really? - (deSitter) - (5) - July 6, 2004, 08:30:52 PM EDT

I don't live there. - (admin) - (4) - July 6, 2004, 08:32:11 PM EDT

Re: I don't live there. - (deSitter) - (3) - July 6, 2004, 08:34:28 PM EDT

High side of 20%... - (admin) - (2) - July 6, 2004, 09:09:37 PM EDT

$5 for two beers - (deSitter) - (1) - July 6, 2004, 09:12:05 PM EDT

That won't buy one at ballgame. -NT - (jbrabeck) - July 6, 2004, 10:35:58 PM EDT

Horribly overboard - (JayMehaffey) - July 5, 2004, 02:08:43 PM EDT

Tough luck - (lister) - (10) - July 5, 2004, 03:45:14 PM EDT

A-friggin'-men. -NT - (inthane-chan) - (9) - July 5, 2004, 06:57:15 PM EDT

"A-friggin'-men." - it's the new MeToo! (tm) - (Meerkat) - (8) - July 5, 2004, 07:47:35 PM EDT

Here in Kingston, Ontario - (jake123) - (7) - July 5, 2004, 10:24:12 PM EDT

Hasten the old folks to the grave - (lister) - (6) - July 5, 2004, 10:32:04 PM EDT

Re: parents who smoke in front of their kids - (a6l6e6x) - (5) - July 6, 2004, 12:42:12 PM EDT

My wife and SIL had non smoking seats on Aeroflot. - (Another Scott) - (2) - July 6, 2004, 12:52:13 PM EDT

Re: My wife and SIL had non smoking seats on Aeroflot. - (deSitter) - July 6, 2004, 12:58:56 PM EDT

Another recent Aeroflot story. - (Another Scott) - July 20, 2004, 10:29:53 AM EDT

Smoking & non-smoking sections on airplanes - (StevenYap) - (1) - July 8, 2004, 03:27:18 AM EDT

Now don't start getting all logical on us... -NT - (Another Scott) - July 8, 2004, 07:11:57 AM EDT

I see what you posted - (orion) - July 9, 2004, 07:09:11 PM EDT

Bloomington (MN) Bans Smoking - (jbrabeck) - (1) - July 20, 2004, 10:37:26 AM EDT

I'm sure we can go for !00% Sin-free, next. -NT - (Ashton) - July 21, 2004, 06:33:39 PM EDT

iwethey.org

Loaded with more RAM than a goat festival!
320 ms