ObLRPD:

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #94,721 by admin 4/6/03 9:12:17 PM Reply	ObLRPD: It's only a few more levels till we're throwing lions to the lawyers in arena combat. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #94,766 by drewk 4/7/03 8:25:01 AM Reply	ObLRPD: Swiftly thereafter, Choco Taco delight. Then: They're behind the couch. === Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.

Heh. Nice edit. Minor nit. - (inthane-chan) - (37) - April 4, 2003, 12:32:36 PM EST

I'll tell you why. - (pwhysall) - (36) - April 5, 2003, 02:12:20 AM EST

Well stated Peter. Ditto for my situation - work and home. -NT - (jbrabeck) - (35) - April 5, 2003, 08:12:29 AM EST

Tis annoying... - (bepatient) - (34) - April 5, 2003, 09:04:37 AM EST

It takes time to find and edit an offensive subject line - (orion) - (33) - April 5, 2003, 09:21:38 AM EST

This I know. - (bepatient) - (32) - April 5, 2003, 09:35:39 AM EST

Possibility: auto-munging of title on insert - (Yendor) - (6) - April 5, 2003, 09:38:22 AM EST

Funky monkey dancing!!! -NT - (admin) - April 5, 2003, 09:40:42 AM EST

Worse than that. - (bepatient) - (2) - April 5, 2003, 09:41:06 AM EST

That... should be - (folkert) - April 5, 2003, 09:44:41 AM EST

Moral-LRPD: I'm very sorry, but I'm not allowed to argue - (Ashton) - April 5, 2003, 04:29:48 PM EST

The code is there - (orion) - April 5, 2003, 09:41:14 AM EST

This I could live with... with a twist... (new thread) - (folkert) - April 5, 2003, 09:43:44 AM EST

Banning? No. Never. - (folkert) - (16) - April 5, 2003, 09:39:52 AM EST

Re: Banning? No. Never. - (Nightowl) - (3) - April 5, 2003, 10:41:44 AM EST

Peter also... - (folkert) - April 5, 2003, 01:49:01 PM EST

We've been through those fires before. - (static) - (1) - April 5, 2003, 10:48:41 PM EST

Re: We've been through those fires before. - (Nightowl) - April 5, 2003, 11:08:41 PM EST

Re: Banning? No. Never. - (kmself) - (11) - April 6, 2003, 06:08:03 PM EDT

Cholmondeley's Annular Grillage Constant - (Ashton) - April 6, 2003, 11:13:00 PM EDT

Re: Banning? No. Never. - (Nightowl) - (9) - April 7, 2003, 05:06:39 PM EDT

...the concept of...high-value content... - (kmself) - (8) - April 7, 2003, 07:00:57 PM EDT

You scare me -NT - (deSitter) - (2) - April 7, 2003, 07:21:48 PM EDT

I think he's ahead of the curve. - (Ashton) - (1) - April 7, 2003, 07:36:50 PM EDT

Re: I think he's ahead of the curve. - (deSitter) - April 7, 2003, 07:47:43 PM EDT

Re: ...the concept of...high-value content... - (Nightowl) - (4) - April 8, 2003, 01:03:52 AM EDT

Moderation 101 - (drewk) - (1) - April 8, 2003, 07:42:52 AM EDT

Re: Moderation 101 - (Nightowl) - April 8, 2003, 02:00:19 PM EDT

Translation into English... - (ben_tilly) - April 8, 2003, 08:01:59 AM EDT

a good example of that is snmp - (boxley) - April 8, 2003, 10:18:36 AM EDT

When did you become a moralizer? - (deSitter) - (7) - April 5, 2003, 01:44:28 PM EST

RTFT - (inthane-chan) - (6) - April 6, 2003, 06:41:01 PM EDT

Fine - (deSitter) - (5) - April 6, 2003, 07:54:16 PM EDT

But... - (folkert) - (4) - April 6, 2003, 08:00:01 PM EDT

I said, fine - (deSitter) - (3) - April 6, 2003, 08:10:21 PM EDT

Much thanks then to you Sir deSitter. - (folkert) - April 6, 2003, 08:27:42 PM EDT

ObLRPD: - (admin) - (1) - April 6, 2003, 09:12:17 PM EDT

ObLRPD: Swiftly thereafter, Choco Taco delight. - (drewk) - April 7, 2003, 08:25:01 AM EDT

At least as intelligible as your X-Man666.JPG monologues.
64 ms