Nucular(TM)

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #55,503 by Arkadiy 10/8/02 1:32:04 PM Reply	Nucular(TM) is a property of Bush Consulting, Inc. Do not attempt to dilute this valuable trademark by your laughably incorrect spelling. We have only 2 things to worry about: That things will never get back to normal, and that they already have.
Post #55,505 by deSitter 10/8/02 1:51:55 PM Reply	Re: Nucular(TM) Ha! Everyone knows the correct spelling is "nookler". Usage: "Well boys, this is it! [link\|http://www.tigersweat.com/movies/strange/slove03.wav\|Nookler] combat, toe ta toe with the Rooskies!" -drl
Post #55,512 by Ashton 10/8/02 2:48:30 PM Reply	[cackle] - Our pResident's alter-ego: Slim Pickens w/hat
Post #55,514 by a6l6e6x 10/8/02 2:54:08 PM Reply	ROFL! I need to see that movie again. Alex The sun will set without thy assistance. -- The Talmud
Post #55,644 by deSitter 10/8/02 10:40:08 PM Reply	Oh Yeah The great thing about that movie - these people are willing to blow the world to bits because THEY CAN'T GET LAID! Everywhere in the film the message is lack of sex = death. Precious bodily fluids. Preverts (particularly English preverts). Phallic bombers and bombs. Sexy secretaries. Playboy in a B-52. Breeding stock. "Buck" "Turgid"son. Milfred "Muff"ley. Even Dmitri has can't hear over the noise of the party. My theory is - get the leaders laid. Buy them all the best hookers and charge the citizens. Throw in a bag of good dope and the world will be safe - until the dry season. POE - Wing attack R! -drl

Bush speech - Oh lawd - was hoping he could do better ... - (dmarker2) - (70) - Oct. 7, 2002, 08:30:56 PM EDT

Actually I thought he did very well... - (Simon_Jester) - Oct. 7, 2002, 08:44:35 PM EDT

No One Gives A Watty's Cheek - (deSitter) - (1) - Oct. 7, 2002, 08:45:26 PM EDT

shouldnt that be watie?(rifles for) if bill was gonna lift - (boxley) - Oct. 8, 2002, 12:10:00 AM EDT

What do you expect? He doesn't have any material. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Oct. 7, 2002, 08:56:26 PM EDT

They made him an offer he couldn't refuse... - (jb4) - Oct. 8, 2002, 04:35:30 PM EDT

Mr. President, you nailed it! - (Arkadiy) - (58) - Oct. 8, 2002, 09:35:40 AM EDT

If Cuba had oil, these stupid analogies might - (screamer) - (57) - Oct. 8, 2002, 11:22:41 AM EDT

I've said it already - (Arkadiy) - (5) - Oct. 8, 2002, 11:52:38 AM EDT

Again, slight difference of opinion... - (screamer) - (4) - Oct. 8, 2002, 12:44:00 PM EDT

No tyranny? - (Arkadiy) - Oct. 8, 2002, 01:26:11 PM EDT

Are you REALLY that naive? - (jb4) - (1) - Oct. 8, 2002, 04:45:37 PM EDT

jb...be polite. - (Simon_Jester) - Oct. 8, 2002, 05:17:51 PM EDT

Um, you might want to look up "slant drilling". Kuwait did. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Oct. 8, 2002, 07:53:55 PM EDT

Incorrect. - (Brandioch) - (46) - Oct. 8, 2002, 12:33:40 PM EDT

Points on your points... - (screamer) - (45) - Oct. 8, 2002, 02:12:00 PM EDT

Re: Points on your points... - (deSitter) - (16) - Oct. 8, 2002, 02:17:44 PM EDT

Like I said. - (Brandioch) - Oct. 8, 2002, 03:37:16 PM EDT

The best answer I can give... - (screamer) - (14) - Oct. 8, 2002, 04:02:45 PM EDT

Yeah I do know - (Silverlock) - (11) - Oct. 8, 2002, 04:53:58 PM EDT

Anybody else here scared of their own government? - (inthane-chan) - (9) - Oct. 8, 2002, 05:07:41 PM EDT

ditto - (Brandioch) - (1) - Oct. 8, 2002, 07:40:15 PM EDT

Just by being labeled a "terrorist". - WRONG! - (mhuber) - Oct. 9, 2002, 08:38:28 PM EDT

Re: Anybody else here scared of their own government? - (deSitter) - Oct. 8, 2002, 07:53:20 PM EDT

Hopefully everybody - (JayMehaffey) - Oct. 8, 2002, 09:21:45 PM EDT

Scared as in... - (Arkadiy) - (1) - Oct. 8, 2002, 10:29:57 PM EDT

I'll take "A", please. -NT - (inthane-chan) - Oct. 9, 2002, 11:55:54 AM EDT

Not scared - livid__ (but only once in a while) - (Ashton) - (1) - Oct. 9, 2002, 02:45:14 AM EDT

Fear is a warning. - (inthane-chan) - Oct. 9, 2002, 11:58:52 AM EDT

Re: Not of mine thank God, but alarmed at yours <grin> - (dmarker2) - Oct. 9, 2002, 05:50:17 AM EDT

Yeah, my hands are raised too... - (screamer) - Oct. 10, 2002, 03:56:00 PM EDT

Re: The best answer I can give... - (deSitter) - (1) - Oct. 8, 2002, 09:50:32 PM EDT

Agreed - the decline is within - (Ashton) - Oct. 9, 2002, 03:09:57 AM EDT

Counters to your counters. - (Brandioch) - (27) - Oct. 8, 2002, 03:35:01 PM EDT

And so it goes... - (screamer) - (26) - Oct. 8, 2002, 04:30:14 PM EDT

Huh? - (Brandioch) - (25) - Oct. 8, 2002, 07:35:14 PM EDT

nits and LMAO - (screamer) - (22) - Oct. 9, 2002, 11:21:58 AM EDT

WTF? Here are the PHOTOGRAPHS! - (Brandioch) - (21) - Oct. 9, 2002, 03:09:36 PM EDT

I give up... - (screamer) - (20) - Oct. 9, 2002, 07:46:47 PM EDT

And now you go for the semantic play. - (Brandioch) - (19) - Oct. 10, 2002, 01:25:39 AM EDT

OT: Easy on the ad hominem, please. 'Tis not necessary. -NT - (Another Scott) - (18) - Oct. 10, 2002, 07:01:28 AM EDT

Ad hominem attack against minor off topic point=par - (bepatient) - (6) - Oct. 10, 2002, 08:08:14 AM EDT

Re: TIME FOR ALL OF US TO COOL IT - We all ... - (dmarker2) - Oct. 10, 2002, 10:27:42 AM EDT

Deal with it. - (Brandioch) - (4) - Oct. 10, 2002, 10:38:24 AM EDT

Lighten up - (Silverlock) - (1) - Oct. 10, 2002, 11:07:34 AM EDT

That would be valid, except I provided a physical example. - (Brandioch) - Oct. 10, 2002, 01:56:18 PM EDT

Note - (deSitter) - Oct. 10, 2002, 11:22:35 AM EDT

Rules for the home game... - (bepatient) - Oct. 10, 2002, 12:58:04 PM EDT

That wasn't "ad hominem". - (Brandioch) - (10) - Oct. 10, 2002, 12:28:12 PM EDT

The semantic difference may not be the crux of that exchange - (Ashton) - Oct. 10, 2002, 02:24:12 PM EDT

You missed the point of my post. - (Another Scott) - (8) - Oct. 10, 2002, 02:52:07 PM EDT

Simple, it was after I had provided the rebuttal. - (Brandioch) - (7) - Oct. 10, 2002, 03:44:09 PM EDT

Still missing the point: - (admin) - (6) - Oct. 10, 2002, 04:18:35 PM EDT

So many things we do are not "necessary". - (Brandioch) - (5) - Oct. 11, 2002, 07:25:49 AM EDT

And so it goes from the self-appointed knower of all things. -NT - (bepatient) - (4) - Oct. 11, 2002, 08:35:32 AM EDT

What about the Hughes Loan? - (Ashton) - (3) - Oct. 12, 2002, 04:27:49 AM EDT

? - (bepatient) - (2) - Oct. 12, 2002, 08:20:30 AM EDT

Ashleigh Brilliant - (Ashton) - (1) - Oct. 13, 2002, 07:03:05 AM EDT

I thought that... - (bepatient) - Oct. 13, 2002, 10:21:41 AM EDT

bzzt wrong conclusion - (boxley) - (1) - Oct. 10, 2002, 12:45:13 AM EDT

I don't see where you disagree. - (Brandioch) - Oct. 10, 2002, 01:30:26 AM EDT

Re: If Cuba had oil, these stupid analogies might - (deSitter) - (2) - Oct. 8, 2002, 01:31:33 PM EDT

Great site... Thanks for the link... - (screamer) - (1) - Oct. 8, 2002, 03:07:19 PM EDT

Re: Great site... Thanks for the link... - (deSitter) - Oct. 8, 2002, 04:41:09 PM EDT

BZZZT - "For The Children" - (mhuber) - Oct. 9, 2002, 08:55:27 PM EDT

I for one am gratified... - (marlowe) - (5) - Oct. 8, 2002, 01:03:24 PM EDT

Nucular(TM) - (Arkadiy) - (4) - Oct. 8, 2002, 01:32:04 PM EDT

Re: Nucular(TM) - (deSitter) - (3) - Oct. 8, 2002, 01:51:55 PM EDT

[cackle] - Our pResident's alter-ego: Slim Pickens w/hat -NT - (Ashton) - Oct. 8, 2002, 02:48:30 PM EDT

ROFL! I need to see that movie again. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - (1) - Oct. 8, 2002, 02:54:08 PM EDT

Oh Yeah - (deSitter) - Oct. 8, 2002, 10:40:08 PM EDT

I invited her up to my place for a little midnight bait. I said, "Come on, baby. It'll only take a few minnows." She threw me that same old line: "Not tonight, I've got a haddock."
72 ms