IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Yes, ' plan' is not the deed. More is implicit.
This is a *MAJOR* change (and complete reversal of Bush's stated aim towards reducing all dependence upon nuclear weapons):

Planning for a new generation of 'tactical' weapons and especially the nice euphemism of theater weapons. Note that just such a leaked-Announcement dovetails perfectly with the paranoid-view of Reagan ---> Bush plans for militarization of space; evidence exists to substantiate this ongoing sub-rosa direction in US thinking:


[link|http://www.cdi.org/adm/1330/Gagnon.html|
Bruce Gagnon comments at CDI]
(Center for Defense Information, DC)

[link|http://www.globenet.free-online.co.uk/|
Apparent main site in UK]

[link|http://past.thenation.com/issue/000619/0619hartung.shtml|
The Nation, from 6/19/00]

I have to find out more about Gagnon and his now several-year involvement in ferreting out material.. If he's a loony, he's a saner one than the Singing-AG of the DOJ.



Why am I not surprised at the event and the direction -->?

Ashton
Good Luck, Chaps - you will be *Needing* That.
New Uh, Ash, think about it a bit more.
These are called "contingency plans". They have them for every country in the world, and Antarctica. Most of them are dreamed up by Majors and below in brainstorming sessions not terribly dissimilar to the kinds of planning, etc. used by online action gamers. I'm quite sure that somewhere in the files there's a contingency plan for, e.g., nuking London, with ground zero(es) carefully plotted for maximum destructive effect. It wouldn't surprise me if there was one for New York city, just in case the Bad Guys (who?) should take it over. It does not surprise me in the least that there are contingency plans for bombing various places in the Middle East, with the ones we've been noticing lately being the most recently updated. [It's probably been a while since the plans for invasion of Argentina were looked at.]

Normally they don't get released. There was a time when they did once in a while, but in the modern hysterical atmosphere people always overreact. One of the worst bits of weaseling in the Freedom Of Information Act is the one that lets the military refuse to release such things.

This is a psyop aimed at Saddam and Prince Whatever of Saudi Arabia. Think of it as a line in an email header: Bcc: S. Hussein (via CNN)

Regards,
Ric
New "Disinformation, Age of" - see under "Current Events"
See also: dissembling and gerund phrases such as at:

[link|http://www.geocities.com/gene_moutoux/diagram2.htm|Lying techniques parsed]

Umm Ric - you didn't imagine that I/we er *believe* at face value ANYTHING released officially or officially-leaked (from M$ or any agency, that is. Now the Pope is in an entireley different category, natch..)

Mean only: this particular tack creates an open-ended set of expectations - opposite to those generated by the [lie] Other recent [lie] regarding our Selected Resident's putative view of:

Say? "The non-Role of Nukes in Everyone's Future". THAT piece of disinfo you see.. clashes a bit with the latest homogenized piece of fluff.

My merely personal opinion is: no military mind can long stay away from imagining: possession of Ultimate Control of all aspects of the daily world play. It is *THERE* to be imagined about, as perfectly obviously as, as a down-scale Mercedes owner's guaranteed lust for a new $86K SL-500 .... the both convertible AND hardtop - at the push of a VERY-expensive button, covered by the skin of a popular endangered-species du jour.. (er the button, not the top itself). Ergo" Military Control of Space\ufffd is as natural as a MBA's catechism or a flak's fluff.

SO I merely commented upon the neat way in which this latest disinfo dovetails with that equally obvious Military Grail. Just add into the mix, our utter Religious Faith in the exercise of pure Power - over all more subtle human considerations like (persuasion?) ...

and stir.

Otherwise of course: Nothing is changed.


HTH.


Ashton

*FLASH* This just in:

Every day and in every way.. the Russians are believing more and more that, we are a bunch of poop-heads* and will do Anything to keep them screwed up - while smiling a lot.

* poop-head - illustrates the level of actual discourse when Dr. K(issinger - you thought I meant Kevorkian din'cha?) and Dubya get down to Long Term Stradigy: sellin' the mining rights on Ceres, say.. to the Lone Star Drilling Co. and bro Jeb's branch o' the Prescott Bush Legacy.
     Thinking the unthinkable - (marlowe) - (38)
         If you've got the weapons . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (11)
             Tactical Nukes - (nking) - (5)
                 Not as effective as might be hoped. - (JayMehaffey) - (4)
                     You mean old-old tech - (nking) - (3)
                         Sort of - (JayMehaffey) - (2)
                             Armor? - (Ashton) - (1)
                                 What it says . . . - (Andrew Grygus)
             Yes, ' plan' is not the deed. More is implicit. - (Ashton) - (2)
                 Uh, Ash, think about it a bit more. - (Ric Locke) - (1)
                     "Disinformation, Age of" - see under "Current Events" - (Ashton)
             Re: As usual - balanced well reasoned logic ... - (dmarker2) - (1)
                 Bush 2 imitates Reagan? - (wharris2)
         Not so unthinkable - (JayMehaffey) - (1)
             Iran on the enemy list - (wharris2)
         Ummm, this has been our doctrine..... - (Brandioch) - (23)
             Strategic Doctrine - (Ric Locke) - (22)
                 20 years is the limit of my personal experience. - (Brandioch) - (20)
                     Re: 20 years is the limit of my personal experience. - (Ric Locke) - (19)
                         Not that thinking. - (Brandioch) - (18)
                             What was the Clancy novel? - (wharris2) - (1)
                                 Red Storm - (dlevitt)
                             Re: Not that thinking. - (Ric Locke) - (15)
                                 India and Pakistan. - (Brandioch) - (14)
                                     Agreed - down to the root issues - - (Ashton) - (5)
                                         Ashton, you said it. - (Arkadiy) - (1)
                                             If there were a simpler explanation - (Ashton)
                                         Aston..I must disagree... - (Simon_Jester)
                                         Koki Annann on Charlie Rose, last night - (Ashton) - (1)
                                             (cough, cough) Kofi Annan that is. :) - (a6l6e6x)
                                     India and Pakistan. - (Ric Locke) - (7)
                                         Whatever. - (Brandioch) - (6)
                                             Oh. Drift. - (Ric Locke) - (5)
                                                 Who, what, where? - (Brandioch) - (4)
                                                     Ah, yes. - (Ric Locke) - (3)
                                                         Step #1. Knowledge. - (Brandioch) - (2)
                                                             So simple. - (Ric Locke) - (1)
                                                                 It's very simple to refute me. - (Brandioch)
                 Well-enough put, but only part of the scenario IMhO - (Ashton)

Such firms gave a bad name to the penis enhancement business.
71 ms