No, you mistake my meaning.
The supposed "sub-sub-thread" about "That your contention that it wasn't confusing" is your conversation, not mine. In other words, I'm not involved in your "Peter was wrong himself, therefore I was right" construct, which was invented far after the fact to justify your *original* post -- regardless of your attempt to hijack my meaning.
And now I'm done with this completely, now that you've finished your descent into casuistry.
HTH!
Regards,
-scott anderson
"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Edited by
admin
June 10, 2005, 08:22:40 AM EDT
No, you mistake my meaning.
The supposed "sub-sub-thread" about "That your contention that it wasn't confusing" is your conversation, not mine. I'm not involved in your "Peter was wrong himself, therefore I was right" construct, which was invented far after the fact to justify your *original* post.
And now I'm done with this completely, now that you've finished your descent into casuistry.
HTH!
Regards,
-scott anderson
"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."