That address responds to ping

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #53,982 by SpiceWare 9/30/02 1:51:48 PM Reply	That address responds to ping but no response to ftp or http. Anybody know if SWBELL in St. Louis provides static IPs for ADSL accounts? Darrell Spice, Jr. [link\|http://home.houston.rr.com/spiceware/\|SpiceWare] - We don't do Windows, it's too much of a chore
Post #53,985 by deSitter 9/30/02 2:17:35 PM Reply	Re: That address responds to ping The point is made, let's please not rub it in. It's a serious issue to manipulate your friends like that. But there is no point in increasing the pain. Let me handle it, please. (Static or not, ICMP is on.) -drl
Post #53,986 by admin 9/30/02 2:20:47 PM Reply	Some personal accountability would be nice. Since I have the perp pretty much dead to rights with additional access log information that I haven't posted... It never hurts to apologize... especially considering the amount of time I've had to invest tracking this crap down. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #54,093 by boxley 9/30/02 9:10:48 PM Reply	Any chance of a 3rd person in STL with BSdsl who norm isnt having any luck installing a webserver for and who prolly knows very well this board and how it works because of norms frequent posting. I remember a co-worker who watched me on sleazyboard and shuffled my picture around. I was convinced one of you guys had hacked our server and was twisting in knots trying to find the hole while he was laughing his ass off. thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] qui mori didicit servire dedidicit
Post #54,116 by admin 9/30/02 9:30:45 PM Reply	... I'm not going to get into it any further, owing to the request Ross made. There is more to this than just an IP address, however. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #54,126 by SpiceWare 9/30/02 10:15:22 PM Reply	? The point is made, let's please not rub it in. Umm, ok. I guess I missed something somewhere. :-/ Darrell Spice, Jr. [link\|http://home.houston.rr.com/spiceware/\|SpiceWare] - We don't do Windows, it's too much of a chore

Sorry for the troubles - (orion) - (97) - Sept. 21, 2002, 08:44:38 PM EDT

It's not about your whining... err... troubles - (folkert) - (3) - Sept. 22, 2002, 06:56:36 PM EDT

Well I am confused - (orion) - (2) - Sept. 22, 2002, 10:30:25 PM EDT

Did you get your Uncle"s hair???? - (bepatient) - Sept. 22, 2002, 10:36:52 PM EDT

Please distinguish... - (folkert) - Sept. 22, 2002, 11:26:22 PM EDT

Softly softly. - (static) - (5) - Sept. 23, 2002, 12:20:57 AM EDT

Good advice - (Silverlock) - (4) - Sept. 23, 2002, 01:09:43 AM EDT

That's not quite what I meant, but that's okay. :-) -NT - (static) - (2) - Sept. 23, 2002, 01:31:47 AM EDT

I know what you meant - (Silverlock) - (1) - Sept. 23, 2002, 09:49:40 AM EDT

Troublemaker.. - (Ashton) - Sept. 24, 2002, 04:03:12 PM EDT

Muahahaha, great one! :-) - (CRConrad) - Sept. 23, 2002, 09:26:48 AM EDT

I personally cannot believe it - (tseliot) - (2) - Sept. 23, 2002, 01:58:24 PM EDT

IT with kids in the house - (jake123) - (1) - Sept. 24, 2002, 04:12:14 PM EDT

Now imagine.. - (Ashton) - Sept. 24, 2002, 05:06:50 PM EDT

You are set up Norm! - (Snitcherooni) - (83) - Sept. 27, 2002, 10:30:15 PM EDT

Take it elsewhere... - (ChrisR) - (65) - Sept. 27, 2002, 10:44:14 PM EDT

Re: Take it elsewhere... - (deSitter) - (64) - Sept. 27, 2002, 11:19:16 PM EDT

seconded -NT - (boxley) - Sept. 27, 2002, 11:21:18 PM EDT

Doesn't change my response - (bepatient) - Sept. 28, 2002, 01:57:13 AM EDT

Doesn't seem like NK's writing to me. - (Another Scott) - (61) - Sept. 28, 2002, 11:16:34 AM EDT

Not me, but it disturbs me greatly - (orion) - Sept. 29, 2002, 11:06:38 PM EDT

Not me, but it disturbs me greatly - (orion) - Sept. 29, 2002, 11:05:48 PM EDT

No, the actual telltale sign.. - (deSitter) - (58) - Sept. 30, 2002, 04:12:33 AM EDT

Interesting - (orion) - (57) - Sept. 30, 2002, 07:12:08 AM EDT

Re: Interesting - (deSitter) - (48) - Sept. 30, 2002, 10:57:30 AM EDT

What can I do then? - (orion) - (47) - Oct. 3, 2002, 09:50:14 PM EDT

get a scrip for androgel - (boxley) - (2) - Oct. 3, 2002, 10:03:51 PM EDT

May not be the problem - (orion) - (1) - Oct. 4, 2002, 11:12:00 PM EDT

Not quite right. - (Another Scott) - Oct. 7, 2002, 08:22:46 PM EDT

Re: What can I do then? - (deSitter) - (43) - Oct. 3, 2002, 11:03:16 PM EDT

Re: What can I do then? - (deSitter) - (42) - Oct. 3, 2002, 11:06:58 PM EDT

That would've been my suggestion. -NT - (bepatient) - Oct. 3, 2002, 11:08:22 PM EDT

Apologizing - (orion) - (40) - Oct. 4, 2002, 11:10:33 PM EDT

No - (deSitter) - (38) - Oct. 4, 2002, 11:49:52 PM EDT

Apology again - (orion) - (37) - Oct. 7, 2002, 07:35:41 PM EDT

no prob norm -NT - (boxley) - Oct. 7, 2002, 07:38:45 PM EDT

Of Course! - (deSitter) - (30) - Oct. 7, 2002, 07:44:51 PM EDT

There is a fine line - (orion) - (29) - Oct. 7, 2002, 08:16:13 PM EDT

Heh - I'm still looking for the pencil to draw it with... -NT - (imric) - Oct. 7, 2002, 08:21:06 PM EDT

Bullshit - (deSitter) - (27) - Oct. 7, 2002, 08:22:05 PM EDT

I dunno... - (imric) - (25) - Oct. 7, 2002, 08:33:15 PM EDT

Very nice - (Ashton) - Oct. 7, 2002, 10:40:00 PM EDT

Stupid request - (ben_tilly) - (23) - Oct. 8, 2002, 07:04:00 AM EDT

Sure... - (imric) - (5) - Oct. 8, 2002, 08:31:58 AM EDT

Re: Sure... - (deSitter) - (4) - Oct. 8, 2002, 09:46:38 AM EDT

Nice to be appreciated - thanks! -NT - (imric) - (3) - Oct. 8, 2002, 07:01:08 PM EDT

Re: Nice to be appreciated - thanks! - (deSitter) - Oct. 8, 2002, 08:27:00 PM EDT

Re: Nice to be appreciated - (deSitter) - (1) - Oct. 8, 2002, 11:30:34 PM EDT

*blush* -NT - (imric) - Oct. 9, 2002, 09:06:54 AM EDT

Targets & tags -- annoying as hell - (kmself) - (16) - Oct. 8, 2002, 01:30:46 PM EDT

*shrug* Tell you what. Let's vote on it. - (imric) - (15) - Oct. 8, 2002, 06:31:23 PM EDT

What he's talking about - (drewk) - (3) - Oct. 8, 2002, 06:52:45 PM EDT

So - you don't mind targets? 'K.. - (imric) - (1) - Oct. 8, 2002, 06:59:25 PM EDT

Sure, I see why - (drewk) - Oct. 8, 2002, 07:40:18 PM EDT

What he said - (ben_tilly) - Oct. 8, 2002, 07:11:47 PM EDT

FWIW, I've always disliked targeted links. - (admin) - (2) - Oct. 8, 2002, 07:04:54 PM EDT

Bribes... - (imric) - (1) - Oct. 8, 2002, 07:29:32 PM EDT

Bah. - (admin) - Oct. 8, 2002, 07:34:15 PM EDT

If I see a link in Imric's post I know a new window will pop - (boxley) - Oct. 8, 2002, 07:54:11 PM EDT

Re: *shrug* Tell you what. Let's vote on it. - (deSitter) - (1) - Oct. 8, 2002, 08:16:53 PM EDT

your target did not link :-) -NT - (boxley) - Oct. 8, 2002, 08:44:42 PM EDT

Can see both sides. - (Another Scott) - Oct. 8, 2002, 08:56:11 PM EDT

How to open in new windows, block target-generated windows - (kmself) - (3) - Oct. 9, 2002, 03:31:10 AM EDT

*smile* OK, then, no problems anymore? Ben, anyone? - (imric) - (2) - Oct. 9, 2002, 09:05:33 AM EDT

I can't use Karsten's solution - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Oct. 9, 2002, 06:48:43 PM EDT

Hmmm. - (imric) - Oct. 9, 2002, 07:58:14 PM EDT

absolutely true Im quite off brand myself - (boxley) - Oct. 8, 2002, 07:51:55 AM EDT

*smile* - (imric) - Oct. 7, 2002, 08:19:05 PM EDT

Sure thing, man. -NT - (bepatient) - Oct. 7, 2002, 08:22:29 PM EDT

Much better - (ben_tilly) - Oct. 7, 2002, 09:27:41 PM EDT

De nada. -NT - (Ashton) - Oct. 7, 2002, 10:42:44 PM EDT

Yes, and Thanks. -NT - (Steve Lowe) - Oct. 8, 2002, 03:44:48 AM EDT

A tip - (ben_tilly) - Oct. 5, 2002, 07:36:01 AM EDT

What's really interesting... - (admin) - (7) - Sept. 30, 2002, 12:39:34 PM EDT

That address responds to ping - (SpiceWare) - (5) - Sept. 30, 2002, 01:51:48 PM EDT

Re: That address responds to ping - (deSitter) - (4) - Sept. 30, 2002, 02:17:35 PM EDT

Some personal accountability would be nice. - (admin) - (2) - Sept. 30, 2002, 02:20:47 PM EDT

Any chance of a 3rd person in STL - (boxley) - (1) - Sept. 30, 2002, 09:10:48 PM EDT

... - (admin) - Sept. 30, 2002, 09:30:45 PM EDT

? - (SpiceWare) - Sept. 30, 2002, 10:15:22 PM EDT

Interesting enough - (orion) - Oct. 3, 2002, 09:58:40 PM EDT

Fsck off bucko! -NT - (bepatient) - Oct. 5, 2002, 11:13:14 AM EDT

Right. - (pwhysall) - (15) - Sept. 28, 2002, 02:28:40 AM EDT

What do I know - (orion) - (14) - Sept. 29, 2002, 08:35:46 PM EDT

time to adjust again, working again has changed - (boxley) - Sept. 29, 2002, 08:38:56 PM EDT

Forgive me if I don't see a problem... - (bepatient) - (11) - Sept. 29, 2002, 09:15:33 PM EDT

Apparently not Klez - (orion) - (10) - Sept. 29, 2002, 11:01:16 PM EDT

Klez spoofs sender - (kmself) - Sept. 30, 2002, 12:14:56 AM EDT

I presume . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (8) - Sept. 30, 2002, 12:58:23 AM EDT

Re: I presume . . - (deSitter) - (3) - Sept. 30, 2002, 04:52:11 AM EDT

What fun? - (orion) - Sept. 30, 2002, 06:38:13 AM EDT

Actually you likely didn't miss it - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Sept. 30, 2002, 07:56:48 AM EDT

Re: Actually you likely didn't miss it - (deSitter) - Sept. 30, 2002, 12:04:02 PM EDT

Re: I presume . . - (orion) - (3) - Sept. 30, 2002, 06:44:59 AM EDT

Stop using windows - (jake123) - (1) - Sept. 30, 2002, 12:13:48 PM EDT

I know - (orion) - Oct. 3, 2002, 10:01:45 PM EDT

We use Command antivirus . . - (Andrew Grygus) - Sept. 30, 2002, 12:35:28 PM EDT

Fair weather friends? - (a6l6e6x) - Sept. 29, 2002, 09:25:05 PM EDT

Your Freak God[tm] was HERE!
199 ms