More

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #419,973 by drook 8/25/17 10:13:21 AM 8/25/17 10:13:21 AM Reply	More Anyone who claims that Reagan was not (at the very least) a Fascist sympathizer didn't pay attention to the 1980's. Knowingly laying a wreath at the graves of dead SS is equivalent to saying, "All is forgiven." So, the intent of the wreath laying was to say, "We forgive you the atrocities, now let's move forward". -- Drew
Post #419,974 by mmoffitt 8/25/17 10:44:58 AM 8/25/17 10:44:58 AM Reply	Preamble qualified all of that as "In my view." HTH. Again. Context is everything. bcnu, Mikem It's mourning in America again.

of cornerstones and plinths - (rcareaga) - (29) - Aug. 18, 2017, 03:57:08 PM EDT

Re: the common soldiers of the Waffen SS - (mmoffitt) - (28) - Aug. 18, 2017, 04:19:13 PM EDT

Yeah, Bitburg - (rcareaga) - (1) - Aug. 18, 2017, 06:35:56 PM EDT

I remember Ross. - (mmoffitt) - Aug. 21, 2017, 08:30:40 AM EDT

How is that hypocritical? - (drook) - (3) - Aug. 18, 2017, 08:06:30 PM EDT

"widely suspected" - (Ashton) - Aug. 18, 2017, 10:07:59 PM EDT

And yet, he persisted. - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Aug. 21, 2017, 08:47:32 AM EDT

(I bloody-well visited THAT pernicious Place/also described an odd event--in these parts.) - (Ashton) - Aug. 21, 2017, 05:27:33 PM EDT

Huge diff. Says so right in the first sentence of the NYT article: - (CRConrad) - (21) - Aug. 21, 2017, 04:56:43 AM EDT

Ellie Wiesel thought I did. - (mmoffitt) - (20) - Aug. 22, 2017, 08:36:37 AM EDT

Well-done, young Nazi-Stalker! (one of the few [+] connotations of that word? :-) -NT - (Ashton) - Aug. 21, 2017, 05:13:19 PM EDT

They were a) actual corpses, not statues; b) 2.5 % Waffen-SS, 97.5 % Wehrmacht. - (CRConrad) - (18) - Aug. 24, 2017, 09:38:59 AM EDT

Re: He could be wrong, and there he was; - (mmoffitt) - (17) - Aug. 24, 2017, 11:49:18 AM EDT

Intent matters - (drook) - (12) - Aug. 24, 2017, 12:29:29 PM EDT

Yes, it does. - (mmoffitt) - (8) - Aug. 24, 2017, 01:06:29 PM EDT

Do you know the difference between "action" and "intent"? -NT - (drook) - (1) - Aug. 24, 2017, 02:23:36 PM EDT

One more time, slowly. - (mmoffitt) - Aug. 24, 2017, 03:40:40 PM EDT

You're still just as wrong. - (CRConrad) - (5) - Aug. 25, 2017, 02:17:36 AM EDT

Re: You're still just as wrong. - (mmoffitt) - (4) - Aug. 25, 2017, 08:30:12 AM EDT

Heh - (drook) - (3) - Aug. 25, 2017, 09:49:55 AM EDT

I'm sorry. I didn't know you were so unfamiliar with English. - (mmoffitt) - (2) - Aug. 25, 2017, 10:01:57 AM EDT

More - (drook) - (1) - Aug. 25, 2017, 10:13:21 AM EDT

Preamble qualified all of that as "In my view." HTH. Again. Context is everything. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Aug. 25, 2017, 10:44:58 AM EDT

There can be 'intent' ... clouded with umm.. ... insouciance? - (Ashton) - (2) - Aug. 24, 2017, 02:47:35 PM EDT

You sure you want to go there? - (drook) - (1) - Aug. 25, 2017, 09:56:56 AM EDT

Umm, where is that 'Writ-for-textbook-adornment' ? - (Ashton) - Aug. 25, 2017, 04:14:48 PM EDT

There is also significant difference among . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (3) - Aug. 24, 2017, 02:59:27 PM EDT

Heh. "Administrative". You mean like scheduling trains? -NT - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Aug. 24, 2017, 03:43:17 PM EDT

Yup, and placing orders for more ovens. - (Andrew Grygus) - Aug. 24, 2017, 04:29:23 PM EDT

Disctinctions are of scale only - (scoenye) - Aug. 25, 2017, 03:54:24 PM EDT

Danger, Will Robinson! Danger!
79 ms