There can be 'intent' ... clouded with umm.. ... insouciance?
As when {same guy..} LET FAIL that Genuine, genuinely-Possible *real* Joint-Action to begin eliminating All Nukes. Period.
Ronnie had this little-dream-inside; "Star Warz" == close-enough - and By-golly (plus a jar of Jelly Beans)
He Waren't gonna let that little (er WEAPON-dream) be upstaged by [see ^above^]
So, sorry then: pure-intent don't mean a whole lot, where the Reasoning is defective / emulates what was LOST at Reykjavik :-/
There is no algorithm extant, far as I've heard, as bestows Instant Wisdom on ..a flake.
Now let's define flake, Wash/rinse.. (Let's not even Try 'Reasoning', 'K?)
[Referents] Don't Leave Home without a correct one, sez Chase (et al)
Ronnie had this little-dream-inside; "Star Warz" == close-enough - and By-golly (plus a jar of Jelly Beans)
He Waren't gonna let that little (er WEAPON-dream) be upstaged by [see ^above^]
So, sorry then: pure-intent don't mean a whole lot, where the Reasoning is defective / emulates what was LOST at Reykjavik :-/
There is no algorithm extant, far as I've heard, as bestows Instant Wisdom on ..a flake.
Now let's define flake, Wash/rinse.. (Let's not even Try 'Reasoning', 'K?)
[Referents] Don't Leave Home without a correct one, sez Chase (et al)
