and you say that Govt has no right to spend money it borrowed. In his case, the money should go back to the taxpayers, in your case, (I guess) to the bondholders. Right?


I do know that I built a strawman. I do know that you and Ayn Rand Institute are worlds apart. But is it not funny when such a different premises bring different peope to (outwardly) similar conclusions?

There is one premise that you folks share, though. Both you and Rand fans think that human nature is, in essense, good. Yours and theirs definitions of "good" may differ, but the premises do sound the same.