As long as you state that these are your religious beliefs, you are free to say what you want, as long as you do not threaten others, or incite others to harm.
I need to come up with a better way of saying that.
Defining the "next" constitution.
- (inthane-chan)
- (37)
- April 2, 2004, 04:07:40 PM EST
"is not a living, self-aware organism" ... coma?
- (drewk)
- (11)
- April 2, 2004, 03:05:56 PM EST
If you've got better verbiage, I'm all ears.
- (inthane-chan)
- (10)
- April 2, 2004, 03:11:41 PM EST
How about
- (jbrabeck)
- (6)
- April 2, 2004, 03:43:58 PM EST
Artificail life? Alien life?
-NT
- (Arkadiy)
- (3)
- April 2, 2004, 03:51:15 PM EST
Re: Artificail life? Alien life?
- (jb4)
- (2)
- April 2, 2004, 06:06:54 PM EST
I think granting them the rights of citizens...
- (inthane-chan)
- April 2, 2004, 06:12:25 PM EST
But when they are made/found
- (Arkadiy)
- April 3, 2004, 12:43:46 PM EST
Re: How about.. don't forget my cats
- (xtensive)
- (1)
- April 2, 2004, 04:42:43 PM EST
That's a long limb, alright.
- (inthane-chan)
- April 2, 2004, 04:56:17 PM EST
Current legal standard is "natural person"
- (drewk)
- (2)
- April 2, 2004, 03:59:00 PM EST
Thanks, incorporated.
-NT
- (inthane-chan)
- April 2, 2004, 04:09:19 PM EST
Needs clarification
- (tuberculosis)
- Aug. 21, 2007, 06:40:20 AM EDT
I have problems with your use of "truth"
- (Arkadiy)
- (1)
- April 2, 2004, 03:39:23 PM EST
Freedom of religion.
- (inthane-chan)
- April 2, 2004, 04:08:41 PM EST
Re: Defining the "next" constitution.
- (JayMehaffey)
- (2)
- April 2, 2004, 05:53:52 PM EST
on your post right to assemble and seek redress from the gov
- (boxley)
- April 2, 2004, 06:15:18 PM EST
Good food for thought.
- (inthane-chan)
- April 2, 2004, 06:16:36 PM EST
Re: Defining the "next" constitution.
- (jb4)
- (1)
- April 2, 2004, 06:05:37 PM EST
Re: Defining the "next" constitution.
- (inthane-chan)
- April 2, 2004, 06:18:02 PM EST
Give it a shot
- (boxley)
- April 2, 2004, 06:32:55 PM EST
Another thing to consider as a source - the UDHR.
- (Another Scott)
- (16)
- April 2, 2004, 11:09:17 PM EST
total disagreement on a few things
- (boxley)
- (15)
- April 2, 2004, 11:27:34 PM EST
Re: total disagreement on a few things
- (JayMehaffey)
- (14)
- April 3, 2004, 01:16:37 AM EST
that is not a basic function of states
- (boxley)
- (13)
- April 3, 2004, 07:27:15 AM EST
The basic function of states . . .
- (Andrew Grygus)
- April 3, 2004, 10:20:41 AM EST
Re: that is not a basic function of states
- (JayMehaffey)
- (10)
- April 3, 2004, 01:54:38 PM EST
what the state is better doing?
- (boxley)
- (1)
- April 3, 2004, 08:47:38 PM EST
US doesn't do it very well
- (JayMehaffey)
- April 4, 2004, 12:20:27 AM EST
Actually, it is...
- (danreck)
- (7)
- April 5, 2004, 04:33:12 PM EDT
Confucius said it better
- (Ashton)
- April 5, 2004, 05:28:23 PM EDT
Not sure what your point is
- (JayMehaffey)
- (5)
- April 5, 2004, 06:01:44 PM EDT
why should government cover health care?
-NT
- (boxley)
- (4)
- April 5, 2004, 06:06:00 PM EDT
Why should business 'cover' health care?
- (Ashton)
- (1)
- April 5, 2004, 07:40:43 PM EDT
Lets start a new thread, free medical care for all or not (new thread)
- (boxley)
- April 5, 2004, 09:44:30 PM EDT
Things to consider
- (JayMehaffey)
- (1)
- April 5, 2004, 09:37:12 PM EDT
Have you visited a VA hospital or IHS clinic lately?
-NT
- (boxley)
- April 5, 2004, 09:45:36 PM EDT
Re: that is not a basic function of states
- (Ashton)
- April 4, 2004, 01:32:10 AM EST