I have problems with your use of "truth"

1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #149,827 by Arkadiy 4/2/04 3:39:23 PM Reply	I have problems with your use of "truth" My religious beliefs are blatant lies to some. Should I still be able to speak about them? -- Less Is More. In my book, About Face, I introduce over 50 powerful design axioms. This is one of them. --Alan Cooper. The Inmates Are Running the Asylum
Post #149,834 by inthane-chan 4/2/04 4:08:41 PM Reply	Freedom of religion. As long as you state that these are your religious beliefs, you are free to say what you want, as long as you do not threaten others, or incite others to harm. I need to come up with a better way of saying that. Nobody wins in a butter eating contest

Defining the "next" constitution. - (inthane-chan) - (37) - April 2, 2004, 04:07:40 PM EST

"is not a living, self-aware organism" ... coma? - (drewk) - (11) - April 2, 2004, 03:05:56 PM EST

If you've got better verbiage, I'm all ears. - (inthane-chan) - (10) - April 2, 2004, 03:11:41 PM EST

How about - (jbrabeck) - (6) - April 2, 2004, 03:43:58 PM EST

Artificail life? Alien life? -NT - (Arkadiy) - (3) - April 2, 2004, 03:51:15 PM EST

Re: Artificail life? Alien life? - (jb4) - (2) - April 2, 2004, 06:06:54 PM EST

I think granting them the rights of citizens... - (inthane-chan) - April 2, 2004, 06:12:25 PM EST

But when they are made/found - (Arkadiy) - April 3, 2004, 12:43:46 PM EST

Re: How about.. don't forget my cats - (xtensive) - (1) - April 2, 2004, 04:42:43 PM EST

That's a long limb, alright. - (inthane-chan) - April 2, 2004, 04:56:17 PM EST

Current legal standard is "natural person" - (drewk) - (2) - April 2, 2004, 03:59:00 PM EST

Thanks, incorporated. -NT - (inthane-chan) - April 2, 2004, 04:09:19 PM EST

Needs clarification - (tuberculosis) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:40:20 AM EDT

I have problems with your use of "truth" - (Arkadiy) - (1) - April 2, 2004, 03:39:23 PM EST

Freedom of religion. - (inthane-chan) - April 2, 2004, 04:08:41 PM EST

Re: Defining the "next" constitution. - (JayMehaffey) - (2) - April 2, 2004, 05:53:52 PM EST

on your post right to assemble and seek redress from the gov - (boxley) - April 2, 2004, 06:15:18 PM EST

Good food for thought. - (inthane-chan) - April 2, 2004, 06:16:36 PM EST

Re: Defining the "next" constitution. - (jb4) - (1) - April 2, 2004, 06:05:37 PM EST

Re: Defining the "next" constitution. - (inthane-chan) - April 2, 2004, 06:18:02 PM EST

Give it a shot - (boxley) - April 2, 2004, 06:32:55 PM EST

Another thing to consider as a source - the UDHR. - (Another Scott) - (16) - April 2, 2004, 11:09:17 PM EST

total disagreement on a few things - (boxley) - (15) - April 2, 2004, 11:27:34 PM EST

Re: total disagreement on a few things - (JayMehaffey) - (14) - April 3, 2004, 01:16:37 AM EST

that is not a basic function of states - (boxley) - (13) - April 3, 2004, 07:27:15 AM EST

The basic function of states . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - April 3, 2004, 10:20:41 AM EST

Re: that is not a basic function of states - (JayMehaffey) - (10) - April 3, 2004, 01:54:38 PM EST

what the state is better doing? - (boxley) - (1) - April 3, 2004, 08:47:38 PM EST

US doesn't do it very well - (JayMehaffey) - April 4, 2004, 12:20:27 AM EST

Actually, it is... - (danreck) - (7) - April 5, 2004, 04:33:12 PM EDT

Confucius said it better - (Ashton) - April 5, 2004, 05:28:23 PM EDT

Not sure what your point is - (JayMehaffey) - (5) - April 5, 2004, 06:01:44 PM EDT

why should government cover health care? -NT - (boxley) - (4) - April 5, 2004, 06:06:00 PM EDT

Why should business 'cover' health care? - (Ashton) - (1) - April 5, 2004, 07:40:43 PM EDT

Lets start a new thread, free medical care for all or not (new thread) - (boxley) - April 5, 2004, 09:44:30 PM EDT

Things to consider - (JayMehaffey) - (1) - April 5, 2004, 09:37:12 PM EDT

Have you visited a VA hospital or IHS clinic lately? -NT - (boxley) - April 5, 2004, 09:45:36 PM EDT

Re: that is not a basic function of states - (Ashton) - April 4, 2004, 01:32:10 AM EST

I have this theory about the Brontosaurus...
65 ms