Oh, right. The origin of life is indeed outside of standard mechanisms of Darwinian evolution (a fact first noted by Darwin).
The origin of life is not outside the theory of Creationism. We know who did it, and we just don't know how or why yet. Provide an alternative to the origin of life if you can. Random Chance just doesn't cut it. Science is unable to reproduce the same results in a controlled environment. These failings show that there was actually some intellgence that provided the origin of life and did so by Intelligent Design. Otherwise scientists could reproduce life in a lab using Random Chance.
The fact that Scientists cannot sucessfully clone anything without it breaking down, aging rapidly, or dying, proves that there is copy protection in the Genetic Code. How did it get there? Why is it there? Not only is the copy protection there, it is signed by its creator by it's very design. The creator didn't want us to genetically copy species, at least not in an easy way.
So let me quickly brush over the final point, your railing about attempted proofs of the non-existence of God. Oddly enough I didn't attempt to prove the non-existence of God. For one thing I know better than that, I am fully aware that the existence or non-existence of God is not amenable to proof. Or, more precisely put, there are many "demonstrations" available, but each has a strong tendancy to confirm for all readers their prior belief system on the subject.
In order to prove or disprove the existance of God, you must define what God is. Nobody is qualified to do that. Like trying to define infinity and measure it with finite measuring devices. Nothing I can show in any evidence, in any proof, in any way shape or form will convince you, if you are a skeptic and totally against the idea and do not have an open mind. God goes beyond all logic, all physical laws, time and space itself are meaningless to such a being.
My prior belief system says that any God able to create the Universe must, a prior, be far more amazing than the Universe created. Going further, if we consider geological time to be The Eiffel Tower, all of human history is a small fleck of paint partway up the tower. The entire history of science fits on a speck of dust on the fleck of paint. And I am but an amused microbe who hears other microbes going on about how we are clearly the purpose of this whole edifice, what it all leads to, and I'm laughing to myself about the lack of perspective.
We could be all goldfish swimming in a big bowl, living in our own waste, realtively speaking. :) The whole purpose of the edifice is unknown. Life is only temporary and finite. 1000 years from now, what will it matter? Religion comes in and gives life a purpose. Suddenly the microbes are important, and find that death is not an end, but only the beginning to something different. The physical body gives way to the soul or spirit. Life continues on in the Afterlife in a different form. The edifice is replaced with something more wonderful, something much larger, no more suffering, no more death, life eternal. Then we find out that physical life as we knew it was one big test, either we pass or fail. The one who created life does the judging in the Afterlife. Hope you pass the audition. :)