Welcome to IWETHEY!
#include "file" for HTML?
- (
inthane-chan)
- (17)
- Feb. 23, 2002, 05:19:30 PM EST
Apache
- (
admin)
- Feb. 23, 2002, 05:23:50 PM EST
Use a templating solution for this
- (
ben_tilly)
- Feb. 23, 2002, 05:33:52 PM EST
Should have been clearer.
- (
inthane-chan)
- (12)
- Feb. 23, 2002, 05:46:08 PM EST
Only workaround...
- (
ChrisR)
- (3)
- Feb. 23, 2002, 05:58:54 PM EST
Bleah.
- (
inthane-chan)
- (2)
- Feb. 23, 2002, 06:07:51 PM EST
If you're gonna do that...
- (
imric)
- (1)
- Feb. 23, 2002, 06:22:34 PM EST
'Cause...
- (
inthane-chan)
- Feb. 23, 2002, 06:35:03 PM EST
What kind of server?
-NT
- (
admin)
- (6)
- Feb. 23, 2002, 10:14:36 PM EST
No control over that.
- (
inthane-chan)
- (5)
- Feb. 25, 2002, 02:17:05 PM EST
But *YOU CAN* include external html fragments.
- (
a6l6e6x)
- (2)
- Feb. 25, 2002, 11:12:43 PM EST
Oops.
- (
inthane-chan)
- (1)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 12:17:16 AM EST
Re: Oops.
- (
a6l6e6x)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 12:15:21 PM EST
I think it's a lexical question.
- (
static)
- (1)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 05:18:31 AM EST
Actually...
- (
inthane-chan)
- Feb. 26, 2002, 03:19:18 PM EST
Nothing in the standard.
- (
static)
- Feb. 24, 2002, 12:19:30 AM EST
Check out the <layer>...</layer> tags
- (
a6l6e6x)
- (1)
- Feb. 23, 2002, 11:03:53 PM EST
Sorry, but that's only for Netscape. Here is how:
- (
a6l6e6x)
- Feb. 24, 2002, 12:44:58 PM EST
Warning - Mozilla 0.9.8 Win32 has problems.
- (
Another Scott)
- (11)
- Feb. 5, 2002, 09:04:39 PM EST
Am looking forward to the OS X version
- (
Meerkat)
- (4)
- Feb. 5, 2002, 08:42:53 PM EST
I like the OS X version a lot (and the lInux one, too)
- (
tjsinclair)
- (3)
- Feb. 6, 2002, 01:13:29 AM EST
Tabbed browsing?
- (
wharris2)
- (1)
- Feb. 6, 2002, 03:10:39 AM EST
No, no cats
- (
tjsinclair)
- Feb. 6, 2002, 02:52:37 PM EST
Am now running 0.9.8 for OS X
- (
Meerkat)
- Feb. 9, 2002, 07:03:10 PM EST
404 errors - is there a proxy around??
- (
scoenye)
- (5)
- Feb. 9, 2002, 10:46:07 AM EST
Yup. That's probably it.
- (
Another Scott)
- (3)
- Feb. 9, 2002, 10:59:35 AM EST
Junkbuster
- (
scoenye)
- (2)
- Feb. 9, 2002, 11:13:15 AM EST
Looks neat. Thanks. Now to figure out the config file...
-NT
- (
Another Scott)
- (1)
- Feb. 12, 2002, 11:01:51 AM EST
Forgot to mention the best part: refiltering
- (
scoenye)
- Feb. 12, 2002, 01:20:29 PM EST
Thanks for bringing this to our attention.
- (
a6l6e6x)
- Feb. 9, 2002, 06:13:49 PM EST
Is it possible to build a good Dynamic HTML application...
- (
johnu)
- (12)
- Feb. 1, 2002, 01:07:12 PM EST
You can get about 80% there.
- (
static)
- (6)
- Feb. 2, 2002, 12:30:58 AM EST
Re: You can get about 80% there.
- (
johnu)
- (2)
- Feb. 4, 2002, 08:51:05 AM EST
Depends on your browser targets...
- (
admin)
- Feb. 4, 2002, 09:12:39 AM EST
I don't know about better...
- (
static)
- Feb. 4, 2002, 09:37:53 PM EST
Re: You can get about 80% there.
- (
johnu)
- Feb. 4, 2002, 08:51:13 AM EST
Re: You can get about 80% there.
- (
johnu)
- (1)
- Feb. 4, 2002, 08:51:13 AM EST
Re: You can get about 80% there.
- (
johnu)
- Feb. 4, 2002, 08:52:40 AM EST
If you decide to try...
- (
ben_tilly)
- (1)
- Feb. 2, 2002, 10:40:06 AM EST
Re: If you decide to try...
- (
johnu)
- Feb. 4, 2002, 08:53:53 AM EST
Yes, but it requires a rethink
- (
tseliot)
- Feb. 4, 2002, 06:38:14 PM EST
I had another idea.
- (
static)
- Feb. 4, 2002, 09:43:01 PM EST
Looks like it's worth a try
- (
johnu)
- Feb. 5, 2002, 01:23:37 PM EST
Next call for opinions:
- (
admin)
- (7)
- Jan. 30, 2002, 09:55:53 AM EST
Build it into the App?
- (
boxley)
- (1)
- Jan. 30, 2002, 09:58:37 AM EST
Don't want to have to build it...
- (
admin)
- Jan. 30, 2002, 09:59:26 AM EST
Webtrends?
- (
pwhysall)
- (3)
- Jan. 30, 2002, 10:35:27 AM EST
Erm... not exactly that kind of reporting :-)
- (
admin)
- (2)
- Jan. 30, 2002, 10:57:34 AM EST
WebTrends have doin's that do that too...
- (
pwhysall)
- (1)
- Jan. 30, 2002, 01:23:41 PM EST
Just looked like web visit analysis to me.
- (
admin)
- Jan. 30, 2002, 01:51:45 PM EST
Doesn't Crystal Reports make one?
-NT
- (
tablizer)
- Feb. 14, 2002, 11:00:18 PM EST
Call for opinions: re: IE vs. Netscape vs. Citrix vs. .NET
- (
admin)
- (39)
- Jan. 25, 2002, 02:15:06 PM EST
Just to be obvious
- (
drewk)
- (1)
- Jan. 25, 2002, 02:20:37 PM EST
That will be one of the points.
- (
admin)
- Jan. 25, 2002, 02:41:37 PM EST
This is up my alley.
- (
nking)
- (3)
- Jan. 25, 2002, 03:54:25 PM EST
Re: This is up my alley.
- (
admin)
- (1)
- Jan. 25, 2002, 05:37:31 PM EST
Alley cats
- (
nking)
- Jan. 25, 2002, 09:24:53 PM EST
Another ? on licensing
- (
admin)
- Jan. 25, 2002, 06:22:57 PM EST
Does it run under Mozilla?
- (
ben_tilly)
- (1)
- Jan. 25, 2002, 04:11:42 PM EST
No.
- (
admin)
- Jan. 25, 2002, 05:08:17 PM EST
Modification effort?
- (
tablizer)
- (1)
- Jan. 25, 2002, 04:33:02 PM EST
IF statements not even necessary
- (
admin)
- Jan. 25, 2002, 05:09:51 PM EST
Take a look at Ximian's Mono...
- (
kmself)
- (1)
- Jan. 25, 2002, 06:44:07 PM EST
Very doubtful.
- (
admin)
- Jan. 25, 2002, 08:13:22 PM EST
Is IE still on the clients' machines?
- (
altmann)
- (3)
- Jan. 25, 2002, 11:52:36 PM EST
Unknown.
- (
admin)
- (2)
- Jan. 26, 2002, 12:21:38 AM EST
IE on client machines
- (
nking)
- (1)
- Jan. 26, 2002, 02:41:35 PM EST
The idea is to avoid a complete rewrite...
-NT
- (
admin)
- Jan. 26, 2002, 04:17:43 PM EST
My $0.02.
- (
Another Scott)
- (9)
- Jan. 26, 2002, 12:50:24 AM EST
Nicely put, or, the dentist says "this won't hurt a bit"
-NT
- (
wharris2)
- Jan. 26, 2002, 02:06:00 AM EST
Netscape 6.02...
- (
admin)
- (7)
- Jan. 26, 2002, 09:32:16 AM EST
Yr facing a psycholgcl. issue not really a technical one
- (
tablizer)
- (1)
- Jan. 26, 2002, 02:14:57 PM EST
This isn't a PHB thing.
- (
admin)
- Jan. 26, 2002, 02:20:36 PM EST
Web Compass
- (
nking)
- (1)
- Jan. 26, 2002, 02:44:02 PM EST
It's all javascript, I've come to find out
-NT
- (
admin)
- Jan. 26, 2002, 04:18:18 PM EST
I'd agree with your solution
- (
tonytib)
- (2)
- Jan. 26, 2002, 02:59:14 PM EST
MS oriented IT people
- (
nking)
- Jan. 26, 2002, 03:11:26 PM EST
I was wrong about the vbscript
- (
admin)
- Jan. 26, 2002, 04:20:26 PM EST
Flat out refusal to answer...
- (
folkert)
- (1)
- Jan. 27, 2002, 04:57:19 PM EST
Refresh my memory?
-NT
- (
admin)
- Jan. 30, 2002, 09:54:15 AM EST
lets look at the ongoing maintenance costs
- (
boxley)
- (10)
- Jan. 28, 2002, 01:28:03 PM EST
You are correct
- (
nking)
- (9)
- Jan. 29, 2002, 03:22:37 PM EST
Cynical view
- (
wharris2)
- (8)
- Jan. 30, 2002, 09:26:55 AM EST
If you want to keep that view...
- (
ben_tilly)
- (4)
- Jan. 30, 2002, 09:54:15 AM EST
yes, well I'll charge him even more
- (
cforde)
- (3)
- Jan. 30, 2002, 12:16:12 PM EST
At this rate...
- (
ben_tilly)
- Jan. 30, 2002, 02:20:49 PM EST
Good for him I'll charge less
- (
drewk)
- (1)
- Jan. 30, 2002, 02:42:10 PM EST
Too bad for you...
- (
ben_tilly)
- Jan. 30, 2002, 09:11:45 PM EST
That is why Open Source doesn't catch on with the suits
- (
nking)
- (2)
- Jan. 30, 2002, 04:22:03 PM EST
Heh
- (
n3jja)
- (1)
- Jan. 30, 2002, 08:39:10 PM EST
Problem solving
- (
nking)
- Jan. 31, 2002, 06:34:19 PM EST
Getting Apache to drop its drawers
- (
tablizer)
- (4)
- Jan. 24, 2002, 01:41:50 PM EST
Web Listener == mod_plsql, probably
- (
admin)
- (2)
- Jan. 24, 2002, 01:52:27 PM EST
IOW, I am hosed
- (
tablizer)
- (1)
- Jan. 24, 2002, 02:26:43 PM EST
Re: IOW, I am hosed
- (
a6l6e6x)
- Jan. 25, 2002, 10:25:00 PM EST
Nope.....
- (
folkert)
- Jan. 27, 2002, 05:03:26 PM EST
There are perhaps no more tragic creatures than middle-aged, middle-class tourists, unused to traveling in unfamiliar places, on a lifetime dream vacation.
1,242 ms