Default browser for evolution under KDE - (drewk) - (15) - April 10, 2006, 10:40:13 AM EDT
         Working as designed? Don't use Evolution? :-( - (Another Scott) - (1) - April 10, 2006, 10:50:40 AM EDT
             We're working on the workaround - (drewk) - April 10, 2006, 11:07:53 AM EDT
         Okay, I have since chatting on jabber... - (folkert) - (12) - April 10, 2006, 03:31:57 PM EDT
             Tedious but straightforward - (drewk) - (11) - April 10, 2006, 04:01:14 PM EDT
                 Debian has made the alternatives available. (plus KDE upd) - (folkert) - (10) - April 10, 2006, 04:38:36 PM EDT
                     Problem is, Evolution isn't in the KDE configs - (drewk) - (9) - April 10, 2006, 08:34:53 PM EDT
                         So, which browser *IS* coming up? - (folkert) - (8) - April 11, 2006, 10:42:15 AM EDT
                             Quanta, which is an editor not a browser - (drewk) - (7) - April 11, 2006, 12:47:22 PM EDT
                                 apt-get remove --purge quanta ? -NT - (Yendor) - (6) - April 11, 2006, 01:33:10 PM EDT
                                     Actually I should do that anyway - (drewk) - (5) - April 11, 2006, 02:12:54 PM EDT
                                         So much for $EDITOR being useful... -NT - (Yendor) - April 11, 2006, 02:31:00 PM EDT
                                         I'd purge that puppy. - (folkert) - (1) - April 11, 2006, 02:38:49 PM EDT
                                             Gonezers - (drewk) - April 11, 2006, 03:29:56 PM EDT
                                         Shades of IE, eh what? -NT - (a6l6e6x) - (1) - April 12, 2006, 04:17:22 PM EDT
                                             No, not at all. - (folkert) - April 12, 2006, 06:59:27 PM EDT

     Not sure if I should worry about some cron.daily output - (drewk) - (2) - April 7, 2006, 10:58:54 AM EDT
         apt-get install cruft - (pwhysall) - (1) - April 7, 2006, 08:05:09 PM EDT
             That's the problem ... there's *already* too much cruft -NT - (drewk) - April 7, 2006, 08:18:30 PM EDT

     Debian dependancy question - (drewk) - (4) - April 6, 2006, 12:01:04 PM EDT
         Are you mixing stable/testing/unstable? - (scoenye) - April 6, 2006, 02:25:00 PM EDT
         Since usually this is caused by... - (folkert) - (2) - April 6, 2006, 03:35:47 PM EDT
             That dependance was hanging an upgrade - (drewk) - (1) - April 6, 2006, 06:41:25 PM EDT
                 LIB UR RIT! -NT - (folkert) - April 7, 2006, 07:22:52 AM EDT

     Guide to Troubleshooting Linux Problems - (drewk) - (8) - March 30, 2006, 09:30:05 PM EST
         Nice resource - (tjsinclair) - (7) - March 30, 2006, 10:05:47 PM EST
             strace: I would - (broomberg) - (6) - March 30, 2006, 11:21:45 PM EST
                 I'm glad to say that I don't have that problem - (ben_tilly) - (5) - March 31, 2006, 01:33:12 AM EST
                     Wouldn't it be nice... - (folkert) - (1) - March 31, 2006, 10:48:15 AM EST
                         They don't have to - (drewk) - March 31, 2006, 10:53:22 AM EST
                     This typically occurs with commercial apps. -NT - (broomberg) - March 31, 2006, 08:32:43 PM EST
                     Speaking of which - (broomberg) - (1) - March 31, 2006, 08:58:12 PM EST
                         Make him read the following - (ben_tilly) - April 8, 2006, 05:40:51 PM EDT

     What to do with motd? - (drewk) - (5) - March 27, 2006, 02:30:04 PM EST
         Just make it an empty file. -NT - (pwhysall) - March 27, 2006, 02:37:26 PM EST
         "> /etc/motd && > /etc/motd.static" - (folkert) - (3) - March 27, 2006, 03:05:14 PM EST
             Was going to do something similar - (drewk) - (2) - March 27, 2006, 03:55:18 PM EST
                 Better to put something in there. - (admin) - (1) - March 27, 2006, 04:49:26 PM EST
                     Good tip, done -NT - (drewk) - March 27, 2006, 10:59:22 PM EST